Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
Compared from 65 real runner reviews
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer v3 vs Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
Side by side from 65 real reviews. Every count is the same as on each shoe’s page.
How the signal works
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
Add a third shoe
71 signal
23 reviews75 signal
42 reviewsIn short
Responsive, stable and protective; scattered complaints include foam going dead at high mileage.
Firm, stable and light for speed sessions; reviews are lukewarm, with several calling it flat or dull.
Liked mostreviews mentioning it
Watch forreviews mentioning it
Specs
- Weight
- 278 g (9.8 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 41 mm heel / 35 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Weight
- 238 g (8.4 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 36 mm heel / 28 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 8 mm
Add a third shoe
More comparisons
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer v3 vs PUMA Deviate Nitro 2
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer v3 vs adidas Adizero Boston 13
- New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer v3 vs Nike Zoom Fly 6
- Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 vs adidas Adizero Boston 12
- Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 vs adidas Adizero Adios 8
- Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 vs adidas Adizero Boston 13
Shares count reviews with a clear verdict from the recent window, like each shoe’s page. Tags are counted over the same reviews. All shoes