Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
Compared from 93 real runner reviews
On Cloudeclipse vs adidas Ultraboost Light vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13
Side by side from 93 real reviews. Every count is the same as on each shoe’s page.
How the signal works
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
74 signal
19 reviews62 signal
14 reviews87 signal
60 reviewsIn short
Comfortable, stable and long-lasting, though squeaking is the most repeated complaint.
Runners mostly see the adidas Ultraboost Light as a stable casual, walking and travel shoe rather than a running shoe.
Very plush for recovery and slow long runs, but some find it mushy at faster paces.
Liked mostreviews mentioning it
Watch forreviews mentioning it
Specs
- Weight
- 275 g (9.7 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 37 mm heel / 31 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Weight
- 299 g (10.5 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 30 mm heel / 20 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 10 mm
- Weight
- 261 g (9.2 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 37 mm heel / 31 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
More comparisons
- On Cloudeclipse vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13
- On Cloudeclipse vs On Cloudsurfer 7
- adidas Ultraboost Light vs adidas Supernova Prima
- adidas Ultraboost Light vs adidas Supernova Rise 3
- New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13 vs On Cloudsurfer 7
- New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X More v4
Shares count reviews with a clear verdict from the recent window, like each shoe’s page. Tags are counted over the same reviews. All shoes