Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
Compared from 82 real runner reviews
On Cloudeclipse vs New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 vs On Cloudsurfer 7
Side by side from 82 real reviews. Every count is the same as on each shoe’s page.
How the signal works
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
74 signal
19 reviews71 signal
21 reviews82 signal
42 reviewsIn short
Comfortable, stable and long-lasting, though squeaking is the most repeated complaint.
Good-value daily trainer with some plate pop, though several had heel slip or dead foam.
Light, comfortable easy-run shoe with a wide toe box; squeaking is the most repeated complaint.
Liked mostreviews mentioning it
Watch forreviews mentioning it
Specs
- Weight
- 275 g (9.7 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 37 mm heel / 31 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Weight
- 302 g (10.7 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 33.5 mm heel / 27.5 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Weight
- 245 g (8.6 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 32 mm heel / 22 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 10 mm
More comparisons
- On Cloudeclipse vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13
- On Cloudeclipse vs On Cloudsurfer 7
- New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 vs adidas Supernova+
- New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 vs New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4
- New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 vs Nike Pegasus 41
- On Cloudsurfer 7 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13
Shares count reviews with a clear verdict from the recent window, like each shoe’s page. Tags are counted over the same reviews. All shoes