Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Great value: a lightweight, versatile trainer that's responsive yet training-friendly and fun across efforts, a solid do-it-all shoe for the price. Traction and the H-Plate add some stability to a neutral, narrow platform. But the lateral-heel H-Plate wedge bothers him, and the fit is snug.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester: a lot to love. It doesn't look or feel like a Skechers: a lighter, lower-stack, bouncy daily trainer with enough cushion for easy miles that can pick up the pace. It beat expectations without blowing him away. His favourite Skechers yet and good value at $130, behind the Rebel v5 and Evo SL.
Blog · iRunFar – Craig Randall · 2 days ago
Extremely happy with the fit, comfort and looks: a roomy, cushy forefoot suited his wide, bunion-prone feet and eased his metatarsalgia, and it's a blast at normal paces on smooth trails. But the wavy, sparsely lugged outsole gets clumsy at speed on steep technical terrain. Very pricey.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Taylor Bodin · 2 days ago
No plate, no problem: one of the smoothest shoes he's ever run in, with gobs of soft cushion and a true bounce when pushing. He felt himself gliding over the trail, and his feet felt fantastic after long runs. Priced as a racer, it could equally be a superbly made daily shoe for comfort-first runners.
Blog · Switchback Travel – Maggie Slepian · 2 days ago
The shoe that made running fun this season: the most stable, locked-in feel she's tested, well-spaced lugs that grip on steep terrain, and rebound second to none. The upper, outsole and lugs still look new, unlike shoes she's worn smooth in under 200 miles. Sizing ran nearly a full size off.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Alyssa Leib · 2 days ago
83%: grip this good, light, bouncy cushioning and a snug, secure fit let a Golden, Colorado trail runner pick up the pace on technical trails. But it's very narrow with no wide option, it only comes in unisex sizing and one bright colourway, and the lacing can't be adjusted, so it's not a go-to for everyone.
Blog · Run Oregon – Matt Rasmussen · 2 days ago
A lightweight, high-performance trail racer that thrives on short, fast, technical efforts: smooth over rolling hills and short, steep climbs, with energy return that stays controlled on descents. All Terrain Contagrip bites well on dry rocky singletrack. Not for muddy slogs or 50-mile days.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Taylor Bodin · 2 days ago
Still an exciting, versatile racer, now centred on technical terrain: extra protective foam and a bit more stability give it reach for efforts up to 4–6 hours, though it's less suited to smooth trails. But a pinch in the throat cost forefoot mobility, and chunks of foam were missing after his first 2-hour run.
Blog · WeeViews – Hollie S · 2 days ago
Proof Salomon can make a legit road racer: responsive, bouncy foam, an efficient plate, a smooth ride, a light, breathable upper, and traction she'd trust in the wet. Minimal wear at 50 miles, and she expects ~200. One of her favourite carbon shoes this year. Not for short intervals.
Blog · Runpanel – Or Dalah · 2 days ago
A rare combination of softness, bounce and stability: soft landings, very high responsiveness, and heel and upper stabilisers that, unlike other soft shoes, didn't irritate his ankle tendons. No visible outsole wear after ~200 km, and Contagrip improves grip on asphalt. The extra ankle support takes getting used to.
Blog · RunMag – David · 2 days ago
9/10. A very pleasant fit that adapts even to wide feet, with slipper-like comfort and lightness. Soft Energy Foam+ and a carbon plate combine for dynamic, efficient fast running, and the grip bites on the forefoot. He wouldn't use it for easy endurance runs. Ideal for prepared racers, 5K to marathon.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
A winner: a true race-day fit and a bouncy-yet-stable Pebax midsole, though a touch firmer than rivals. Salomon has arrived on the marathon scene, with forefoot stability that keeps runners comfortable late on, but he wouldn't spend Alphafly money on a first-generation racer.
Blog · FueledByLOLZ – Hollie · 2 days ago
A long-time fan of the line: Salomon kept the ride that worked and improved the fit, so it feels more secure and easier to trust on long days. Protective without feeling heavy, with good Contagrip traction even on wet light trails; still fine after ~100 miles. An easy-day and long-run workhorse.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Lightweight for its max cushioning, with good foam, decent transitions and good versatility. But the midfoot feels undercut with a lateral squeeze, and lateral sole flaring pushes him medially, which limits long-run use and makes it less fun for him. Good value if the geometry and fit work for you.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Comfortable and buoyant: a cushioned, responsive midsole that feels soft at first but firmer when running, a secure midfoot, a protective gusseted tongue and a grippy, durable outsole. A great all-rounder for neutral runners, though something firmer suits fast intervals. Heel support isn't great.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A light, plush, high-drop max-cushion trainer with surprising responsiveness and little rocker, versatile from easy and long miles to uptempo. It does its job very well. But it's as neutral as it gets, too unstable for another tester beyond shorter runs, and the exposed outsole was wearing and tearing by 30 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Too much support and guidance for his gait, causing inner-heel discomfort, and the lack of forefoot cushioning hurt his feet on a 40 km long run. The thin tongue causes lace bite and the collar lets in debris. Positives: a wide, planted base, a spacious forefoot and outstanding traction and durability.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
His favourite stability shoe recently: a secure fit, comfortable guidance from sidewalls and a dual-density midsole, a good heel transition and a cushioned, bouncy ride for consistent efforts, fine on 14-milers. Excellent durability, with little wear at 75 miles. Mild lace bite, and heavier than v1.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon · 2 days ago
Overlooked but solid and dependable for tough daily miles: a firm, bouncy, comfortable trainer that looks great and has the best outsole rubber on the market, doing what runners want from most Brooks trainers better. Not as fun as the Evo SL or Vomero, and lacing was tricky for ~50 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A lightweight, well-made, great-looking entry-level road-to-trail shoe for gravel paths, dirt roads and mild trails, with little outsole wear after 50+ miles. It was firm and constrictive, needing many runs to break in, felt too high for her weak ankles on rocks, and the upper held water.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A solid, lighter rockered trail shoe with good ground feel and some road-to-trail ability, best for moderate miles on mild to moderately technical trails; little outsole wear at 40 miles. A go-to for horse and bluff trails, if a tad flexible up front on climbs. Another tester wants more forefoot room.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester sees it as a sign On is turning a corner: Helion foam and CloudTec pods work surprisingly well from sidewalks to gravel rail-trails. But it's narrow with a shallow toe box that left his big toe aching; size up half. Another tester: light and versatile, but too rigid for 10–15+ miles or technical terrain.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Constance Mahoney · 2 days ago
A significant update (93%): plenty of stable, slightly springy cushion that kept her legs fresh on long runs, downhill impact absorption so good she forgot her shoes, and chevron lugs that bite better into loose dirt and rock. Good for hot trail runs. The midfoot is snug, and there's no high-energy pop.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 2 days ago
One tester (8.85/10): a comfortable, protective ride with excellent lockdown over varied terrain and a very durable build, though not the lightest; she rolled an ankle in a race, so heel stability needs work. Another tester: not light at 316 g but never sluggish, balanced and controlled, with enough cushion for ultras.
Blog · CleverHiker – Nathan Allen · 2 days ago
One of the more comfortable trail shoes they tested: solid for everyday training, with good traction, excellent on mixed pavement, dirt and gravel, breathable and stable, with no durability issues near 100 miles. The midfoot runs narrow; not ideal for technical, steep or slick trails or racing. 4.1/5.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
Both were On sceptics; past road models left rocks wedged in the outsole. Fans of On's signature ride will find it a great fit: lightweight, responsive and firm, with a connected-to-the-ground feel plus the durability and traction trails need. On won him over on pavement and now on the trails too.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
After 250+ miles, including several half marathons, she calls it a great daily trainer and a great upgrade: breathable, comfortable all over, durable and well made, working exceptionally well for faster mid-distance runs and part of her rotation for every speed workout. It's a little pricey, and the upper shows dirt.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A balanced, lightweight trainer with decent responsiveness that does a bit of everything, cushioned enough for long runs, and good value. One tester would like livelier foam and more forefoot width. Another tester loved the firm, neutral ride (13.5 miles without issue), but the toe box hurt until ~15 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A very well-built daily trainer that will last you miles, with long-lasting comfort, a smooth ride, a stylish look and an upper that delivers on many levels. It can wear many hats but falls short when you want a PR. Despite the 'max' name it's firmer than expected and less soft than rivals.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Excellent cushioning for fans of firm rockers: great for easy rhythmic miles, stable for a neutral shoe thanks to good sidewalls, and a good walking and standing shoe. The foam lacks pop at speed, the laces bite through the tongue, and at $180 it lacks rivals' versatility. Too firm for some.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester sees it as an improvement on the Cloudeclipse and a redemption after v2 flop: a nicer, more dialed-in upper, no loud speedboard, a smooth ride, the same $180. Another tester, on his first On, was impressed: good-looking, a pleasant ride, and minimal wear after 50+ miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A good daily trainer for up to 5 miles: lightweight, breathable and durable, with little to no wear after well over 100 miles. The midsole falls short on longer runs, and it runs small. She loves it most for all-day wear and walking, and recommends it for people who stand all workday.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
One tester: a nice training shoe with good rhythm, a durable build, a steady forefoot rocker, mild-to-moderate responsiveness, good cushioning and lockdown; fair value at $160.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester: a utilitarian daily trainer at best, not the worst shoe you'll buy but not one you'll long to run in; On is treading water on innovation. An average addition that proves On's inconsistency. A third tester finds it fine but with nothing excellent: OK for 3–6 miles, then monotonous.
Blog · Startline wa doko desu ka? – Shibuken · 2 days ago
He switched into it at 15 km of a rainy overnight 100 km run and ran the last ~80 km in it. It stayed dry until ~60 km, then water seeped in at the ankle; it's not a rain boot. Amazingly, no blisters at all, even with soaked feet. Slippery on wet manholes. A buy for people who run or go out in the rain.
Blog · iRunFar – Natalie Chirgwin · 2 days ago
An excellent choice for mountain running, technical trails or simply going fast, with a lightweight, responsive ride and a breathable yet protective upper; smooth even on concrete. After 150 miles the upper shows minimal wear, though midsole longevity is unproven. The forefoot fits slightly tight.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
Great and comfortable but too close to the Pegasus Trail 5 for $10 more: a plush road-to-trail grinder. Another tester found it uber-comfortable but wobbly on technical descents, with forefoot slide and an unstable heel. A third tester found it narrow, a bit heavy and short on traction, but great on gravel.
Blog · Running Lab – Julien Guyod · 2 days ago
A 2:38 marathoner calls it a formidable weapon from 5K to the marathon: excellent shock absorption at any distance, best when you accelerate, and a tough Atomknit upper. Less explosive for sharp track work. The foam shows visible wear fast and an Air unit burst on his v3, so save it for race day.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown · 2 days ago
His current racing shoe of choice from 5 miles to the marathon: bouncy, fun and versatile, with a secure, roomy-for-a-racer fit, and comparatively stable, so it works at 5:30/mile or 9+ min/mile. It's comparatively heavy (still light) and squeaky; 5K specialists have lighter, more aggressive options.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
It remains one of the best race-day shoes, especially for the marathon: a comfortable, accommodating upper, light, bouncy foam and Air pods that carry tired legs late on, now cheaper. Lighter, faster options exist, and it squeaked for the first 5–6 miles. Another tester: 'you can buy confidence.'
Blog · Gearist – Brandon Wood · 2 days ago
A switchblade of a shoe: it cruises easy miles or goes whip-fast without fuss, with an upper that holds the foot on any terrain and no break-in. After 60 miles, much of it on abrasive rock, there's very little wear. It may feel stiff for cushion lovers, it's narrow-ish in the midfoot, and $260 prices many out.
Blog · iRunFar – Alli Miles · 2 days ago
After 250+ miles she trusts it opening up on steep descents, hopping boulders and scrambling peaks: a high-performance trail trainer and racer whose durable build handles sky races to cruisy ultras. Fun for daily runs, but the price reflects super-shoe tech; runners without big goals don't need it.
Blog · iRunFar – Kristin Zosel · 2 days ago
Her favourite shoe in the line and one of her all-time favourite lightweight daily trail shoes: a smooth heel-to-toe roll with firm, efficient energy return that invites pushing the pace. At ~150 miles the upper hasn't stretched and the outsole looks new. It's not burly enough to be an all-mountain shoe for her.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
Possibly one of the best walking shoes money can buy and a solid all-rounder from roads to trails; fans of the last version will love it as much or more. Another tester recommends it for gravel and dry, groomed trails and for anyone wanting higher drop. A third tester: one of Nike's best 'everything' shoes.
Blog · Run & Smile – Roman Brcar · 2 days ago
Not a do-it-all shoe. Bought with his own money, reviewed in agreement with NB. Over 120 km it felt light, snappy and propulsive; it kept him in control through a half marathon and showed no outsole wear. Comfortable with no blisters, sticky on wet roads and stable in corners. Best for 5K to half and workouts, not easy runs. Size up half.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 2 days ago
One tester (8.9/10): delightfully fast turnover, a plate at a sweet spot of stiffness, and a fine choice from 5K to half, though the heel design is problematic. An ideal racer up to the half and an all-round trainer, smooth even at 10:30/mile thanks to a snappy flex, and the outsole looks great after 50 miles.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A firmer, lower-stack super shoe true to its 5K–10K purpose (one tester says up to a half), and good value at $200. But one tester found it a bit soft for fast efforts, with a short fit, heel rubbing and early outsole tearing. Another tester gave the fit an F: heel blisters and bleeding kept it out of her 7-mile race.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One of her favourite updates, a more traditional race-day feel for distance runners, kept in her rotation through summer speed work. Probably the most fun shoe he's run in: not the softest, bounciest or most propulsive, but it blends all three into a fantastic racer across paces from tempo to top speed.
Blog · Rundefeated – Rizqa Lahuddin · 2 days ago
A reliable, comfortable cushioned daily trainer: Fresh Foam X that's soft without being mushy, and monsoon-proof grip on wet asphalt, tiles and painted road lines. Understated looks work for the office, and it gives ~90% of the 1080/More experience for less. Great for long runs, not for speed sessions.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Jessica O'Donnell · 2 days ago
A great high-cushion daily trainer for easy miles: soft and forgiving without being squishy, with a smooth rocker that rolls you forward, a true-to-size accommodating fit, a breathable upper and secure stretch laces. When she picked up the pace it felt too soft to respond; not for intervals or races.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A simple, soft shoe for easy running and walking: soft cushioning, a mildly flexible rocker, a wider fit, decent durability at 30 miles and solid value at $145. But the midsole bottoms out and isn't responsive, it's mostly unstable, and the heel padding irritates. Fine for walking, not for his running needs.
Blog · Runnea UK – Imanol Urrestizala · 2 days ago
An ultra trail runner found it perfect up to 10–12 km, secure and responsive, and fine on road-to-trail mixes, but a ~20 km mountain route left his feet tired. A versatile, comfortable, affordable gateway trail shoe, soft yet stable; traction and durability could improve, and it's not for technical terrain.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A solid max-cushion trainer with no real weaknesses: a really durable outsole, good stability, deep cushioning, a comfortable locked-down upper and outstanding reflectivity, premium and well built. But it lacks excitement and energy return, and it's pricier than rivals. Less fun than the Neo Vista 2.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
A tank-like build with a comfortable fit and huge expected durability, but very stiff and firm. The two foams didn't mesh at first; after 20 miles it runs middle of the road, moderately cushioned and leaning firm. The heel doesn't clear cleanly, the fit is slightly loose, and in a crowded category he can't rank it high.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
The softest, bounciest Mizuno midsole she's tried and her current favourite, able to pick up the pace. Another tester finds the underfoot feel amazing but the upper so narrow and low-volume that at $180 he'd look elsewhere unless you have a narrow foot. A third tester sees lots of potential in the foams.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Henry Howard · 2 days ago
Wise improvements over the debut model: even lighter and built for speed, a reputable option for shorter trail days on flat, fast surfaces, and it held up reasonably well after 50 miles. It's niche, not for muddy, snowy or technical terrain or distances over a half marathon, and the narrow forefoot won't suit everyone.
Blog · iRunFar – Alli Miles · 2 days ago
After 100+ miles it still has a place for a specific runner: light, fast and fun, and a cheaper unplated alternative to $250 racers. The glove-like fit suits long, standard-width feet with a narrow heel and may be too snug for wide feet. Not an ideal daily trainer; plated shoes do better at 50K+.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A traditional racing flat for the trails: fun, fast, nimble and aggressive, with good forefoot and midfoot lockdown, good traction and a grounded base. A very good option for sub-ultra trail racing. The heel isn't secure enough on sharp turns and switchbacks, and it struggles in mulchy or soft mud.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester enjoyed it as a rotation shoe for short, speedy trail runs, almost the anti-HOKA: light, interesting and fun on non-technical trails. But $160 is a bit much for such a specific shoe, and the foot shape may exclude many runners. He suggests the cheaper Altra Superior or Nike Terra Kiger.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Still a stable, comfortable shoe best for slower runs and walking, but more fun to run in than before: a smooth roll and lighter weight encourage you along, on a wide, plush base with a comfortable, secure fit and a more accommodating toe box. Outsole durability is only moderate, and the price is high.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
A comfortable max-cushion stability cruiser with a generous upper and an effective H-Frame that suits many walkers and runners. It lacks versatility, the heel could be more secure, and some may want more stability. He grew to enjoy it in winter when the midsole firmed, but it's pricey; buy on a deal.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon, Aldren & Mercer Alden · 2 days ago
One tester liked it a humungous amount: in the top half of stability shoes, with a light, smooth ride and a stable H-Frame, though he'd pick the higher-drop Kayano. Another tester finds it still clunky and boat-like, but a fan of this much less boxy update.
Blog · Negibozu's Running Diary – Negibozu · 2 days ago
A sub-3 ultra runner and fan of the line: a ~21 km half marathon confirmed it as a highly polished jog shoe, comfortable on recovery jogs and long runs with high cushioning and a rocker, with little change from the excellent v10. Concerns: outsole durability, slippery wet grip, and a rocker not for everyone.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A really comfortable flagship daily trainer: a softer, lighter upper, a smooth, easy-rolling transition and plenty of cushioning, stable for a neutral shoe, best for easy and long runs or walks. But by 80 miles he'd chewed through the exposed outsole, and the midsole flattens early for heavy runners.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
Judged in a vacuum it would get pretty decent grades for value and performance (not looks). But with so many solid $140–170 shoes, including HOKA's own Clifton Pro, it's hard to give it the respect its consistent quality deserves. His verdict: just a good shoe, not bad but not great.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Ally Arcuri · 2 days ago
Simple, affordable and light at 7.2 oz: the soft DNA Loft heel absorbs landings, good for casual runs, recovery days, heel strikers and everyday wear. The thin 22 mm forefoot feels flat on uptempo moments with minimal energy return, and the high heel slightly undermines stability in sharp turns.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A decent racer, but he hoped to improve on the Elite 4 PB, which feels faster to him. It's too firm and lacks bounce, so he wouldn't race a marathon in it. Positives: a stiff, snappy plate, outstanding outsole durability, more stability than most racers. The heel counter is loose, and it's not worth $275.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
Brooks finally has a legit super racer: bouncy foam, a responsive heel and good durability after 30 hard miles, best for longer efforts. But heel slippage, excessive toe spring and poor midfoot stability limit him to moderate distances. It lacks speed versatility, the upper needs work, and it's not a $275 shoe.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
Graded D for value at $275. One tester found it efficient (splits faster than it felt) but too squishy, with a loose heel on corners. It rides like an old racing flat without super-shoe spark. A third tester was surprised: light, fast and durable with excellent grip; he'd use it up to a half, not a marathon.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
One of his favourite daily trainers to start the year: a highly cushioned, firm but protective rocker with a snappy forefoot, a comfortable, secure upper and very stable geometry. No outsole wear at 50 miles, so durability justifies the price. Some will find it too firm, and the upper may run warm.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester loved the original, but Brooks stripped away the magic and fun: still a solid max-cushion option for fans of a firmer ride and aggressive rocker, yet a step in the wrong direction. Another tester agrees it's a sophomore slump, heavier and firmer than expected. A perfectly fine shoe, but well short of v1.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Brooks has come full circle back to plush, which she thinks is good: very stable with a secure, comfortable upper hold, good grip and durability, the outsole almost untouched after 60 miles. Brooks' stability lineup is now clearer, with this model for plush comfort. The downsides are weight and a blocky ride.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A rare high-stability premium trainer with a strong medial post, now his go-to daily shoe while rehabbing an irritated posterior tibialis. Responsive DNA Tuned offsets the weight; durability is great at 50 miles. The toe box and heel took 15–20 miles to break in, and it's for easy and long runs only.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Made for loyal buyers of the line and anyone wanting an uncomplicated, comfortable daily driver: soft premium upper, durable outsole and a very stable ride. He enjoys it, but next to modern trainers the DNA Tuned ride is plain vanilla and not springy.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
One of his favourite daily trainers so far this year: a smooth, consistent, rhythmic ride at easy paces without a big rocker, balanced cushioning, and a much more accommodating upper that's plush but breathable. It's not the most versatile, and at $175 he'd like more range, but it could be worth it for easy days only.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Karl Fernandez & Caryn Just · 2 days ago
A reliable daily trainer in a sea of reliable daily trainers: not versatile, and undercut by the lighter, cheaper Glycerin Flex. The midsole mostly absolves a hot upper, but $175 is a lot for a one-trick workhorse; one tester suggests last year's on sale. Another tester: a heavy shoe with a rather standard ride.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A stable neutral run/walk shoe with a smooth rocker that takes orthotics, is highly durable and is far more runnable than before. The tapered toe box makes it run half a size short. The midsole is firmer and less responsive than he'd like, and the lateral heel wall took 15–20 miles to break in.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
Not the most exciting shoe to review, but one tester has never had a bad run in any of the four versions: a great easy-mile cruiser with a firmer feel, a great rocker and noticeable improvements, graded A. Another tester finds it the best Ghost and more fun than v18, but since nothing revolutionary changed, he'd hunt for a discounted v3.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A classic high-drop neutral trainer with a moderate stack and flexible forefoot: a great starter shoe that won't break the bank, with a durable, reliable, very stable ride. The fit is snug and low-volume, bounce and responsiveness are unexciting, and he hoped for more; it lacks pace versatility.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Lindsay Agro · 2 days ago
One tester disliked fit and heat. Brooks hasn't messed up the gravy train: if you loved v17 and earlier, this will do the trick again, though he prefers the lower-drop Ghost Max. One tester really wanted to like it but fought it: it suits only tiny toes and little need for airflow, so it's a walking shoe for her.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Paul Freary · 2 days ago
The first few miles are enough to know you're in the most stable shoe on the market: assuredly stable with no hint of roll. The DNA Loft v3 is softer than before, and it's comfortable for running and long days on your feet, with durable construction and width options for heavier, broader-footed runners. Some will find it a little too much shoe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
One of his favourite stability trainers this year, a surprise after struggling with the series: a fluid ride, well-rounded, less intrusive stability from GuideRails and a medial post, huge durability and width options. It's weighty and a bit snug, the heel needs a cleaner fit and bevel, and it's firm.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas & Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
A springy super trainer, very stable for its 46 mm stack, with a momentous ride when you engage the rocker. One tester loves it for uptempo long runs but finds the stiff midfoot bumpy at easy paces. Another tester: a protective, responsive tempo or long-run shoe, even a marathon racer if super shoes feel unstable.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann, Meaghan Murray & Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
ASICS defied the odds by improving both fit/comfort and the ride, and it was a blast to run in, though $190 makes value questionable. Still a great shoe and a clean, confident upgrade, but super trainer of the year is a tougher case in a stacked market with strong cheaper rivals. A third tester agrees.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
One of the most comfortable shoes he's tested this year, with a super smooth ride, padded landings, a luxurious upper and good stability. But it's heavy by today's standards and feels cumbersome, the outsole wears down fast, and at $180 it's way overpriced. He'd rather wear it to the gym or casually than run in it.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 2 days ago
He really enjoyed it. He set out to test outsole durability after wearing through v7s in 190 miles, and was surprised by the much more dynamic foam. He'd like a more breathable upper that wicks rather than absorbs. A strong zero-drop daily trainer. Incentivized review.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
She liked the P35x midsole, the best foam yet, plus the lower stack and lighter weight. But Altra failed at its signature feature: the low-volume toe box with a lateral sidewall caused severe 5th MTP pain and limited her runs. A nice neutral zero-drop trainer only for narrower forefeet. $160 is a bit overpriced.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
A cushioned 4 mm-drop daily trainer with a good rhythmic rocker and firmer cushioning one tester likes, but he chewed through much of the outsole in 27 miles and the fit is slightly long. Another tester found it snug for an Altra yet stable. At $160 versatility is limited, and the forefoot lacks classic Altra width.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
Altra calls it max cushion, but to him it's a firm shoe with maximum cushioning, far less soft than the Glycerin Max or MagMax Nitro. As with the original Via Olympus there's a disconnect: a comfortable upper and impressive stack, but the EGO FLO ride undercuts it. This time he's not going with the FLO.
Blog · iRunFar – Nick DiMarco · 2 days ago
After about 180 miles of mud, wet rock, roots, snow and road it gets about 90% of the job done everywhere. It's fast, durable and confidence-inspiring, with a controlled, reliable ride despite its aggressive look. At 304 g it only felt heavy next to lighter race shoes. Good long-term value for training and racing.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Edgin & Taylor Bodin · 2 days ago
One tester expected a quick, aggressive rattlesnake, but once he dropped that idea he grew really fond of it: capable, protective and stable, with lots of life underfoot and a premium fit. More yak than mountain goat, a solid high-performance max-stack option. A bit bottom-heavy, and $185.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Markus Zinkl · 2 days ago
A genuinely good daily trainer at a really attractive price, with build quality equal to models costing €30–40 more. The upper should fit a wide range of foot shapes, and the Boost and Bounce combination surprised him. The only compromise as an all-rounder is at higher paces. Score 8.83/10.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
Adidas finally delivers a practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor heavy. The upper rivals pricier shoes: comfortable, true to size, roomy with no pressure points and an excellent heel hold. At $100 it's an incredible value under 10 oz, though he wishes the forefoot were a bit less soft and mellow.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Jim Coulson · 2 days ago
A practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor clunky, and one of the better $100 shoes he's run in a while: light, with a breathable upper, excellent rear hold and traction. Energy return is low to moderate, and he'd like a livelier forefoot. It runs half a size small. Ideal for logging long easy miles.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The fastest, lightest, most exciting racer on the market: his heart rate ran lower at speed and he recovered faster between reps. But it's wobbly and soft, may lack support late in a marathon, and might only be at its best for about 100 miles. At $500 he says most people who'd have to buy it probably shouldn't.
Blog · The Running Channel – Aubrey (via Mark Dredge) · 2 days ago
One tester, a sub-4 marathoner who bought his own pair, ran a two-minute half PB in it: serious pop, best-in-class foam and surprising comfort. Downsides: £450/$500, built for one marathon plus some training, a barely-there upper that needs careful lacing, short laces, and a squishy ride for strong runners only.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
A daily trainer that positively surprised him after 150 km: comfortable on easy, recovery and longer runs, and a reliable, affordable option at €140 for many runners. The foam's responsiveness is moderate, and picking up the pace is limited more by weight and bulk than by the midsole. Final score 7.1.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
The best mid-range daily trainer he's tested all year and a treat to run in, a big surprise after the bland first version. It has a balanced, energetic ride for a wide range of paces, deep cushioning and a forefoot rocker for long runs, plus a durable outsole. The upper is a bit too built up, and heavy overpronators may find it unstable.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
Rated 95%, one of their top scores of the year: a lightweight, nicely cushioned shoe that suits many runners and lets you run without thinking about your shoe. The tweaked PWRRUN adds energy return, and the upper is super breathable. Its main drawback is a narrow midfoot fit, and the lace loops raise durability worries.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
The ground feel was strange after high-stack trainers, but he enjoyed it more with every run. A 14-miler with 4:00/km segments sold him: responsive with enough protection. It's light, with a very comfortable upper. Minor lateral outsole wear showed by 50 miles, though he still expects 300+ miles away from abrasive surfaces.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Justin Alpaugh · 2 days ago
A lightweight trainer meant for speed and short easy miles, with an affordable price and a nice upper, but it still lacks cushioning for longer days and the outsole is a weak point. He likes its simple design but says it just doesn't have a home in his rotation: even for an easy 4-miler he has more fun options.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
An extremely light plateless trainer and workout or racing shoe, with smooth, natural transitions for speedwork and a permanent spot in one tester's rotation. Midsole sidewalls add surprising guidance. The midfoot is slightly baggy, the forefoot needs breaking in, and it's too minimal beyond ~10 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Kaleb Kabakjian & Ruby Wyles · 2 days ago
One tester sees Saucony starting to make a classic of the line for the modern age: lower stack and a simpler upper, moving the right way for original fans while still suiting everyday runners. The firm-at-first foam softens after a few miles. Another tester was won over by its inherent stability and ground connection, which make her feel nimble.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Marcel Krebs & Nils Scharff · 2 days ago
Saucony surprised everyone: a max-cushioned trail shoe with great energy return that many will love, and its outsole sheds mud very well. But it's heavy, and a slimmer upper and less massive outsole would turn a very good shoe into an even better one. They hope a lighter ride sibling follows.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
An extremely durable, tough trail run/hike shoe for long runs, challenging terrain and climbs, best for those who land farther forward because of the forefoot Speed Roll and little bevel. The upper is tough and secure. It fits short at first, and the major stiffness makes slow-speed transitions unstable.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Taylor Bodin, Alex & Kyle · 2 days ago
One tester finds it underwhelming for the Endorphin name, more Shift than Speed: blocky and heavy, with Speedroll fighting lateral moves (once nearly rolling an ankle) and a narrow-ish toe box. But PWRRUN PB is protective and bouncy, the upper locks in superbly, and traction surprised.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
For some runners the super-soft, springy ride will be irresistible: very fun and undoubtedly quick, matched only by the even less stable Metaspeed Ray. For him it's a little too soft, and heavier than rivals: the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo and Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 are a couple of ounces lighter and remain his picks.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers & Matt Klein · 2 days ago
Incredibly soft and responsive, with a secure, comfortable upper, a great wide squared-off toe box, and more stability and speed versatility than v2. It's soft and unstable when slow, and one tester preferred it at 5K–10K pace. It's heavy for a modern super racer and unstable cornering at speed.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
A solid update with extra foam adding welcome stability. It's light, comfortable and bouncy, and one tester will keep it for workouts and long runs, but it's a bit too squishy and lacks the aggressive snap she wants on the start line. One of the comfiest racers, not the lightest or fastest.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 2 days ago
One tester may have found her new race-day shoe: the incredibly bouncy, fun ride of the EE2 in a much better-fitting upper with a slotted carbon plate and tweaked geometry. Testers flag that it's heavy for a top super shoe and priced at the top end, and another tester feels the added drive costs some of the bouncy fun.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Michael Mason-D'Croz · 2 days ago
No frills, just a quality shoe that gets the job done for a great price. It performed incredibly well on short quick runs, long runs and tempos, with grip that feels secure. Saucony didn't mess with a good thing, and putting it on felt like a reunion. The upper gets hot on hot runs.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
That rare bargain shoe that rides like pricier rivals: a rocker propels you forward, and one tester felt no forefoot or heel restrictions while upping tempo and enduring hard pavement with no discomfort days later. Some testers wanted more support.
Blog · Alastair Running – Alastair Dixon · 2 days ago
A smart extension of the road v3: the same stable, predictable, grounded and protective ride, plus grip for gravel, light trails and wet roads. Best at steady paces, not energetic. It's ~12 g heavier and less breathable, so it traps heat in humid weather, and the sockliner allows some shifting underfoot.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Taylor Bodin, Renee Krusemark & Matt Kucharski · 2 days ago
One tester: a solid daily trainer that crosses to light trail and handles pace, and a shoulder-season workhorse in Gore-Tex. Another tester, on rural gravel, finds it light, affordable and fine for 20+ mi long runs to speedwork, but its outsole is barely beyond a road shoe's, so she'd want trail rubber for mud, snow and.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
Mild tweaks rather than a reinvention: a resculpted midsole, new mesh and extra tongue and heel padding. The ride and midsole feel so similar to v4, which can be had for as little as £65, that it makes more financial sense to buy v4 now and pick up v5 once it's discounted.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A lightweight daily trainer for logging the majority of your miles, with great cushioning for its stack. The fit may be a touch narrow for some, and the flexible forefoot won't work for everyone.
Blog · Jolie Foulée – Nicolas Brun · 2 days ago
'A hell of a shoe': more comfortable and less narrow than an Adios Pro 4, with immediate dynamism that lowered his heart rate at a given pace, and the LightSpray upper hadn't moved an inch after 100+ km. At 158 g it's built for marathons and long races on the road. Like most super shoes, it dislikes turns.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini & Roberto · 2 days ago
Very light (158–168 g) and comfortable once on, built for steady marathon pacing, not explosive pushes, with less reactivity than the first Strike or Echo 3. After testing, the right shoe showed partial sole separation and a midsole cut. At €310 it's hard to justify over the laced version.
Blog · Runner's World – Urs Weber · 2 days ago
A very good shoe that fixes every criticism from their v1 test: more toe room yet very good midfoot hold, a sock-like collar that keeps out stones and more cushion under the ball. A versatile road/trail hybrid with moderate cushioning and good wet grip. Testers advise socks with a cuff to avoid collar rub.
Blog · Trail & Kale – Alastair Dixon · 2 days ago
Hits it out of the park for long-distance trail runners: lighter, with a reshuffled MissionGrip that grips much better on steep downhills, a lower 6 mm drop, more flexibility, a comfier heel and ankle, a softer Helion midsole and better breathability. On calls it max cushion, but it's closer to medium.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Renee Krusemark & Jeff Valliere · 2 days ago
One tester enjoyed it: not hugely different from v1, but much more runnable with a softer midsole, and fun on shorter efforts despite its firmness, with an ounce shaved off.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Versatile in fit and function: cloud-pod cushioning and a responsive Speedboard make a good one-shoe choice, with a smooth transition through foot plant and moderate stability. But the heel is too loose for some (welcome room for others), the high collar threatens ankle irritation, and it's pricey.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
It won't stay in his running rotation: an extremely firm, rockered ride heavy and firm for its stack. But its comfortable plush upper, mild stability from a wider platform and firmer medial pods, and rocker earn it a spot for walking and long days standing. Great sockless, but the heel slips with socks.
Blog · Alastair Running – Alastair Dixon · 2 days ago
On's best shoe yet for everyday runners doing real marathon training, a plated super trainer 4:00–5:00 marathoners can race in. It's durable, stable and protective over big mileage, with energy that doesn't just absorb impact. The heel bevel and forefoot rocker roll tired legs along, which felt noticeably less beaten up after long runs.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
A max-but-not-over-max trainer done right: deep, reactive, friendly cushioning, a flexible propulsive plate, impeccable straight-tracking stability, and friendly at any pace with a smooth rocker off a broad, stable heel. Traction and expected durability are strong. It's heavy, by deliberate choice, and the upper could shed weight.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
One tester fits its 4–5 hour marathon target perfectly and had high hopes for Chicago, but after 20+ mi doubts he'll wear it again: not comfy enough for easy days, not snappy enough for tempo, too stiff and heavy for long runs. Another tester finds it overbuilt for racing, had a pinky-toe hot spot, and would buy the S/Lab Spectur.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
He likes a lot: resilient ZoomX, excellent lockdown and comfort, a good outsole and stability, doing everything he wants from a daily trainer, and it's the one to buy. But it's heavy, the tongue is annoying, and amid lighter, more fun competition there are better options for the money.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
He wanted more bang from the Air Zoom unit: for a 'tempo trainer' it leans hard into daily-trainer territory and feels a little overbuilt for its job. But at $165, while rivals creep past $200, the price alone bumps it back up to a solid A.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
ZoomX gives a soft heel landing, the roomier forefoot helps runners who've found Nikes too narrow, and the exposed Air unit makes toe-off snappy. It's a smidge heavy for a performance trainer, and some runners will want a softer forefoot.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
For big fans of the line it's the best version right now, worth the premium over v42, and a good cushioned 10 mm option that's more fun than rivals like the Ghost 18. If you shop around, though, better options exist, such as the Novablast 6, whether you want a speedy all-rounder or a cushioned daily trainer.
Blog · Marathons.com – Clément Laborieux · 2 days ago
Not disappointing only because he expected nothing special, sad for such a historic line. It has secure lockdown, excellent durability and reliable grip, but at 300 g it's one of the heaviest daily trainers, the foam lacks responsiveness, propulsion is minimal, and it's not versatile. Nike needs more meaningful updates.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
At first it fell flat: after bouncy rivals his midfoot strikes thunked down, like a Mazda 3 after a BMW. It grew on him as a sporty all-rounder. At $145 in an age of $200 trainers it's a solid bargain and one-shoe quiver for easy runs, long runs and tempos, especially for newer runners. It remains relatively firm.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Noteworthy updates make the ride smoother and a little more energetic than v41 while keeping the feel that made it popular. It's good value, durable and comfortable for easy daily training, but unlikely to win new fans: less cushioned than rivals, heavy for a lowish stack, and not great for faster runs.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The update doesn't improve the experience: heavy and sluggish even for easy runs, though it protects the legs well and looks good, maybe for the odd 5K or lifestyle wear. For a cushioned shoe for extensive use there are better options, and within Nike's range he much prefers the Vomero 17.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
More comfortable than v3, with a softer, stretchy Flyknit upper, good lockdown, better durability and stability. But it gained an ounce and feels heavy, and the ReactX lacks energy return. Average with no major flaws, at $160 he can't recommend it over rivals like the MaxRoad 6.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Alice Barraclough · 2 days ago
Comfy, cushioned and great-looking for cruising easy miles, and Infinity fans will appreciate the updates. But at £155, an everyday shoe that isn't lightweight or snappy is hard to justify, and they wouldn't reach for it as a plush trainer. It runs snug, so go half a size up.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers & Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A stable neutral daily trainer with a soft Flyknit upper and a firm, rockered ride that v3 fans will like. It gives little softness despite the high stack, and a heavy, high-drop plodder best for easy miles. Size down half, as the sock-like Flyknit holds poorly on turns and faster efforts.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
A joy to run in from the first run, and after 100+ mi the upper shows no wear or tearing, with a soft midsole, durable outsole and good traction. The TPU plate doesn't deliver the responsiveness it promises, and rocks get stuck in the canyon-like outsole grooves.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Decent and budget-friendly, with soft, slightly bouncy FuelCell, decent breathability and wet-pavement grip, and no issues in testing. Comfort is decent rather than exceptional, the midfoot cutout collects rocks on gravel and dirt, and many shoes that cost only a little more perform far better, so they'd look elsewhere.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
The best to date in the line in fit and function: she thoroughly enjoys its smooth, supported ride, secure fit and joyful toe-off, and is passing it to her 16-year-old for 800–3000 m track training. Highly recommended for medium to long runs and longer intervals. The outsole's grip and durability are weak points.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Bach · 2 days ago
Drastically changed into a guidance-based mild-stability shoe with a soft ride and a snug, very comfortable upper, great for narrow feet. One tester enjoyed it as a daily road runner, but its EVA film pushes you laterally and feels odd. It's not as stable as it could be and felt less stable than some neutral trainers.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
Extremely stable on a very wide base, with a very comfortable roomy upper, a huge toe box and durable rubber that should last hundreds of miles. But it's heavy and too one-dimensional for anything but easy days, paling next to NB's own 1080. Fine if you want a comfy, soft, stable and slow ride.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Andy · 2 days ago
A one-trick pony that does its trick very well: extremely comfortable and stable for recovery runs of any distance, very quiet with no slapping, and little wear beyond slight midsole creasing after ~70 km. The second tester found the toe box a bit low and the foam more rigid than v5's. Not a frugal buy.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger & Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
Exactly what one tester expected: a plush max-cushion ride tailor-made for recovery days, like a Bondi with a touch more squish. After a 15-miler left her with sore calves and aggravated feet, lacing up v6 made her feel like a new person: soft enough to cradle, with enough bounce not to feel mushy.
