Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Too much support and guidance for his gait, causing inner-heel discomfort, and the lack of forefoot cushioning hurt his feet on a 40 km long run. The thin tongue causes lace bite and the collar lets in debris. Positives: a wide, planted base, a spacious forefoot and outstanding traction and durability.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
His favourite stability shoe recently: a secure fit, comfortable guidance from sidewalls and a dual-density midsole, a good heel transition and a cushioned, bouncy ride for consistent efforts, fine on 14-milers. Excellent durability, with little wear at 75 miles. Mild lace bite, and heavier than v1.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon · 2 days ago
Overlooked but solid and dependable for tough daily miles: a firm, bouncy, comfortable trainer that looks great and has the best outsole rubber on the market, doing what runners want from most Brooks trainers better. Not as fun as the Evo SL or Vomero, and lacing was tricky for ~50 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Still a stable, comfortable shoe best for slower runs and walking, but more fun to run in than before: a smooth roll and lighter weight encourage you along, on a wide, plush base with a comfortable, secure fit and a more accommodating toe box. Outsole durability is only moderate, and the price is high.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
A comfortable max-cushion stability cruiser with a generous upper and an effective H-Frame that suits many walkers and runners. It lacks versatility, the heel could be more secure, and some may want more stability. He grew to enjoy it in winter when the midsole firmed, but it's pricey; buy on a deal.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon, Aldren & Mercer Alden · 2 days ago
One tester liked it a humungous amount: in the top half of stability shoes, with a light, smooth ride and a stable H-Frame, though he'd pick the higher-drop Kayano. Another tester finds it still clunky and boat-like, but a fan of this much less boxy update.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Brooks has come full circle back to plush, which she thinks is good: very stable with a secure, comfortable upper hold, good grip and durability, the outsole almost untouched after 60 miles. Brooks' stability lineup is now clearer, with this model for plush comfort. The downsides are weight and a blocky ride.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A rare high-stability premium trainer with a strong medial post, now his go-to daily shoe while rehabbing an irritated posterior tibialis. Responsive DNA Tuned offsets the weight; durability is great at 50 miles. The toe box and heel took 15–20 miles to break in, and it's for easy and long runs only.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Paul Freary · 2 days ago
The first few miles are enough to know you're in the most stable shoe on the market: assuredly stable with no hint of roll. The DNA Loft v3 is softer than before, and it's comfortable for running and long days on your feet, with durable construction and width options for heavier, broader-footed runners. Some will find it a little too much shoe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
One of his favourite stability trainers this year, a surprise after struggling with the series: a fluid ride, well-rounded, less intrusive stability from GuideRails and a medial post, huge durability and width options. It's weighty and a bit snug, the heel needs a cleaner fit and bevel, and it's firm.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Versatile in fit and function: cloud-pod cushioning and a responsive Speedboard make a good one-shoe choice, with a smooth transition through foot plant and moderate stability. But the heel is too loose for some (welcome room for others), the high collar threatens ankle irritation, and it's pricey.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
It won't stay in his running rotation: an extremely firm, rockered ride heavy and firm for its stack. But its comfortable plush upper, mild stability from a wider platform and firmer medial pods, and rocker earn it a spot for walking and long days standing. Great sockless, but the heel slips with socks.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
The best to date in the line in fit and function: she thoroughly enjoys its smooth, supported ride, secure fit and joyful toe-off, and is passing it to her 16-year-old for 800–3000 m track training. Highly recommended for medium to long runs and longer intervals. The outsole's grip and durability are weak points.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Bach · 2 days ago
Drastically changed into a guidance-based mild-stability shoe with a soft ride and a snug, very comfortable upper, great for narrow feet. One tester enjoyed it as a daily road runner, but its EVA film pushes you laterally and feels odd. It's not as stable as it could be and felt less stable than some neutral trainers.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Kieran Alger · 2 days ago
A total transformation from v7 and a winner for him: not bouncy or packed with cutting-edge foam, just an excellent, reliable workhorse with mild stability and a light, comfortable ride that never feels unnatural or overbuilt. He tested it on easy runs, progression runs, uneven river paths and 40+ miles of a 100-mile ultra.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
The H-Frame works: it feels planted and stable and controls forefoot motion. It runs narrow with a tapered, rubbing toe box and cramped midfoot. The EVA midsole feels outdated and gives mediocre protection, and it slipped on cold, wet pavement at speed. Fine for snug-fit lovers; most runners have better stability options.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A mild-to-moderate stability shoe best for walking, standing and easy running. It's light for a stability shoe with a wide platform and a softer ride than before, but the medial heel bevel is clunky, medial stability is less pronounced, it's slower, outsole durability is poor and the slipping tongue irritated his foot.
Blog · Runner's World – Cat Bowen · 2 days ago
Plush enough for long mileage yet responsive enough that it never feels like pillows or sand. It reins in her gait when tired without the harsh, pushy feel of earlier versions or a lateral bite, cushioned without being sluggish, with a breathable upper. Brooks kept what works and modernised the rest. It's not a speedwork shoe.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Matthew Richardson · 2 days ago
If you need proven stability, yes: GuideRails work, the build is solid, and it comes in more widths than almost anything they test. The cushioning works at easy paces and walking. Pushed, it felt heavy and stiff, the midfoot support makes the ride a bit choppy, and it's not for hot weather or fans of soft modern foam.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A classic moderate-stability daily trainer with a secure fit, plush heel and fantastic post-like medial support at the heel and midfoot. Its heel transition is the best of any in the line the line he's tried. It isn't responsive, the forefoot firms up over longer miles, and durability is average.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro · 2 days ago
A staple rotation shoe for runners who need more stability, good for any run except speed. Grippy AsicsGrip rubber handles slick roads and off-road. Nitpicks: the knit pull tab and padding irritated her ankles in no-show socks, the upper favours comfort over breathability, and PureGEL makes the heel heavier.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
Subtle tweaks add up to a significant change: the first in the line with an 8 mm drop has a smoother heel transition, a secure upper and adaptive stability, a premium choice for standing, walking and running. The ride is firmer than expected, and it's still on the heavy side.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
One of the best stability shoes, slightly more comfortable than its predecessor with more foam, no extra weight and a more breathable upper. Newer runners can use it for everything, while others should pair it with a speedier shoe. Since it performs much like v31, he'd seek a deal on the older model first.
Blog · Kumazou's Running Bar – Kumazou · 2 days ago
Stability is as solid as ever with the 4D Guidance System, cushioning is slightly up, and the thinner tongue fits superbly for long runs. It's sluggish for tempo or intervals, and fit is slightly snug. At 800+ km the rubber still remains, the upper has no tears, and the midsole hasn't broken down. Still his jogging shoe.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
Credit to adidas for moving the daily line from Boost to DreamStrike+: a grounded, reliable feel that will suit fans of old-school trainers like the Brooks Launch. But the heel strike is loud and the updates modest, so v2 doesn't outshine v1, which is a smarter buy at around £70.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – TJ Jones · 2 days ago
A strong contender in the crowded stability market at $140, holding its own against the Arahi, Adrenaline and GT-2000 for performance and value, with comfortable DreamStrike+ cushioning, a smooth ride and a sleek design. The lacing system is finicky, and it may be too plush for some runners.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A lighter mild-stability training/performance shoe with a PEBA-based DreamStrike+ midsole, a surprisingly smooth ride, a comfortable upper and good durability, a solid option for road runners wanting mild support. The stability is very mild, the ungusseted tongue is thicker than needed, and it's not for dirt or mud.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Lindsay Agro · 2 days ago
Absolutely a top-tier shoe, not just 'good for a stability shoe': Saucony is staking a claim for brand of the year. It gained stack (41/35 mm) yet dropped weight to 9.2 oz, with a breathable mesh upper and a 6 mm drop.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Gillian Myers · 2 days ago
One of the most comfortable stability shoes yet: gentle stability, soft responsive cushioning, a stretchy, roomy toe box and excellent XT-900 traction. It's loud (she sounds like a fat-tire bike) and squeaky, the thick upper still gets warm, the laces are short, and it's a LOT of shoe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A really fun, very different stability shoe: max-stack superfoam with a responsive IncrediLux layer and very good, well-integrated stability that balances an unusually soft ride. It's one of the lightest stability shoes and durable. The toe guard tapers the toe box slightly, making it a touch short.
Blog · The Running Club – Filippo Zavattari · 2 days ago
Stability without invasive rigid posts: raised sidewalls cradle the foot for a natural transition, ideal for moderate overpronators and neutral runners wanting a bit more support. Grip was excellent on asphalt, gravel, porphyry and wet ground, wear after 150 km is average, and the fit is just right.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Jeremy Yoder · 2 days ago
Not one of his favourites: as someone who doesn't need stability it felt restrictive, rigid and one-dimensional, with a firm midsole and sluggish ride. It does shine at arch and heel support, guiding every step to be just like the last, and the upper is comfortable.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A moderate-stability daily trainer with good medial heel and midfoot support, a secure fit and durable thick heel rubber (no dents after 30 mi). The small heel bevel and posterior flare make the rearfoot clunky, it's heavy, and the heel collar is overly padded.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
A remarkable, fun shoe and the best in cushion, stability and upper support, with smooth transitions and a quality heel counter. The sock liner is mediocre and broke down by ~40 mi. The new flex groove exposes midsole under the big toe, which was already wearing at 70 mi, and it's pricey.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon & Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
A real go-to: reliable, comfortable and stable, the kind of shoe that will feel the same at 300 miles as at three. It's not exciting, and you'll never be surprised by your pace. One tester would like Brooks to shed about an ounce and a couple of millimetres of drop.
Blog · Webroccoli – ANaSa · 2 days ago
Lighter and softer than the GT-2000 14, with stable, careful footing and modest rebound that suits daily running, at great value. Still firm compared with rivals. The heel counter is low and the hold feels flimsy, and it's an earnest training shoe without much cushioning fun.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Stability plus bounce: more trampoline-like than expected, and at around 4:00/km he forgot it was a support shoe. Stable via a wide base and heel hold, without correcting your stride. It stands out from rivals at its unchanged ¥16,500 price. The firm, locked-in feel has faded, for better or worse.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Paul Freary · 2 days ago
A nice update: less weight and more cushioning make it a better shoe all round. The control is subtle yet effective, and he found it great for daily miles and even the occasional tempo. Now competitively priced, a good choice for many runners.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Eva Wiehe · 2 days ago
Excellent, unobtrusive stability that doesn't feel like a traditional stability shoe, with modern FF Blast Max comfort and a wide, secure platform. Surprisingly versatile and not stiff. It lacks propulsion and bounce for fast runs, runs a bit small, and the low forefoot may feel tight for wide feet.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Bach Pham · 2 days ago
A lighter moderate-stability trainer with great, full-length centred medial stability. It handled threshold work better than expected, so stability-needing runners might even race a marathon in it. The fit is overly snug and low volume, the heel counter is stiff and the heel still a bit clunky.
Blog · Runaddicts – Paweł Florek · 2 days ago
Above-average stability, excellent build quality and looks, and good ventilation. Comfort is only average when running fast, the tongue is thick and poorly ventilated, and there's fairly little toe room. Rated 4/5 overall.
Blog · Run With Bala – Balaji Manoharan · 2 days ago
The most energetic foam among his support shoes, with max cushion and a modern support system that helps the ankle without stressing the foot. An excellent shoe for easy runs and all-day wear. It doesn't feel like a proper long-run shoe, more a walking and all-day shoe, so wait for a sale.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A very good, comfortable, stable shoe with a bit of bounce, which stability runners long missed out on. He liked it more than the Kayano 32 and Hurricane 25, which are less lively. Too heavy for faster running. Those wanting lighter and more versatile should look at the Arahi 8.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
Soft and stable, but for one tester it gets blocky and burdensome after 5 miles. It's a lot of shoe, he isn't sure it's necessary, and he prefers the Structure 26, which has more toe-off bite and costs $25 less.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
A step up in plushness from the Structure 26, with great rearfoot and midfoot stability and excellent durability and wet/dry traction. It's an excellent walking shoe. The heel is clunky from a sharp bevel, it's firmer than expected and heavier than the 26.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A disappointment next to the Vomero Plus: the thick ReactX frame makes the ride flat and old-school, and it isn't fun. Lockdown is excellent, the step-in feel plush and the outsole durable. It's less stable than other stability trainers, heavy for a daily shoe and narrow in the midfoot.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger & Allison Valliere · 2 days ago
Great cushioning and overall comfort, a gentle forefoot rocker one tester enjoyed, and durability that promises a long life. It's not hyper-modern: the Midfoot Support System is noticeable, it's no secret workout shoe, and another tester finds the styling generic.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
A welcome return to real stability, with a heel clip, a big midfoot sidewall and a firmer, guided ride. For one tester it's a great 8–10 mile shoe with no outsole wear at 50 mi. The firm forefoot feels a bit thin and the heel is stiff, and another tester felt it was only slightly more stable than a neutral shoe.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
More of a true stability trainer than the last two Structures, with a heel clip, more arch support and a firmer ride. Durable, with great traction, but the arch pokes flat feet, the Air unit makes the forefoot lumpy and the upper runs warm. He prefers the 24, and it won't stay in his rotation.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A stable, cushioned daily stability trainer with a durable outsole at reasonable value: reliable for easy runs. It isn't exciting, though. It's too heavy and lacks the bounce for fast running, and the firm midsole made him want something softer beyond 15 miles. He prefers the Kayano 30, Tempus or ForeverRun.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Sam Sheldon · 2 days ago
A bit bulkier but still an old-school trainer, fast enough for speed work and cushioned enough for daily miles: an amazing shoe. He finds the regular v2 naturally stable already and thinks the GuideRails detract, so most people should skip this shoe version.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Built for sustained speed over long intervals and 5K/10K training, and it delivers. Responsive with just enough comfort, plus a smooth transition, light weight and breathability. Her middle- and high-school kids loved it for cross country. The heel counter is small.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A light, nimble ride with decent responsiveness that stays stable thanks to GuideRails, strong lockdown and extra forefoot traction. Performance graded A. It feels durable throughout. The volume is snug for some, and the wide tongue creases on the lateral side.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Allison Valliere · 2 days ago
Completely overhauled and improved: smooth, supportive, comfortable and durable. It now relieves her plantar fasciitis as well as or better than before, and it's great for long days on her feet as a nurse. She lists no cons.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A big improvement: a smoother heel transition despite the 12 mm drop, a more accommodating toe box and moderate-to-high stability from the medial post. The midsole absorbs shock more than it responds, and it's heavier than needed. The low-volume upper is hard to lock down.
Blog · The Running Club – Dario Marchini · 2 days ago
The typical stable daily trainer, improved by nitro-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning and supportive GuideRails for overpronators. After 150 km there was no visible wear even in high-contact zones, which promises a long life for heavier runners too. Grip is average, perhaps not great in the wet.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer (wear-tester Kristin Shiner) · 2 days ago
A wear-tester, a heel striker, found the fit great with no break-in, no blisters and no sliding. The cushioning helped on longer runs without the heel or forefoot soreness she sometimes gets. It's just plain comfortable.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
Durable, with little to no wear after 50+ mi, and its stable, supportive structure makes it her go-to for all-day walks and errands. As a daily running shoe it's firmer than expected (it breaks in after 20–30 mi) and bulky. Size up half a size.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Jen · 2 days ago
A more cushioned, more stable take on the Endorphin line, with mild support as the foot rolls forward. It took a few runs to settle into the fit, especially at the toe, and it isn't cheap for a daily trainer.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) + co-tester · 2 days ago
Rated B+/A-. A light, stable uptempo trainer with a smooth ride. The forefoot is snug, and wet traction is poor.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Luke Chamberlain · 2 days ago
Surprisingly lively for a stability shoe, with smooth support. At 315 g it runs warm, and the forefoot is narrower.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Jeff Ruane · 2 days ago
A stability shoe that can go fast. It handled track, treadmill and 10–12-mile long runs, and they compare it with race-day options like the Hyperion 2 GTS and Kayano.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Score 7.3. Not built for speed: a shoe for high mileage, offering comfort, stability and protection to overpronators and neutral runners alike. Stability comes from balanced foams, not an invasive post. Big, but lighter than before so not cumbersome. Minimal wear at 150 km.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Bach Pham · 2 days ago
B+/B. One tester: better than the last version but a bit too soft for him unless running faster. Another tester: not a bad shoe, just not a standout in an increasingly similar market. Durability about average, with early heel wear.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
One of the best stability trainers he's tested: it doesn't feel stiff or blocky, has no poking arch, and a thick PEBA layer makes it lively. It suits neutral runners too. Still too heavy for uptempo runs, and the normal width is extremely narrow.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas, Bach (DPTs) · 3 days ago
One tester loved it. One tester (C) won't keep running in it: the fit, ride and stability don't work for him. Another tester (C+): slappy transitions and a low-volume midfoot make it a no-go. A third tester (A-) enjoyed it and keeps it for everyday training.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Jeff Beck, Sam Winebaum · 3 days ago
Scores 9.46 (one tester) and 9.75 (another tester): an upper beyond reproach for comfort and hold, and fantastic durability that makes the $150 'feel like a steal'.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray · 3 days ago
'Puma did it!' A legit light stability/guidance trainer on par with the Tempus, Kayano and Arahi. Even neutral one tester enjoyed his miles; pronators have a new option.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 3 days ago
One of her favorite daily trainers: efficient yet comfortable, with a gusseted tongue, a guidance system molded around the heel, dual-density Nitro foam and grippy protective rubber.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 41 days ago
Loving it, even more than their Ghost Max 4.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 45 days ago
Much more fun and protective than their worn GT-2000 12.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 46 days ago
Returned it because the upper pressed on their big toe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
More joyful than the Evo SL, Superblast and Novablast for them, with an old-school feel.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 61 days ago
They used the Structure 26 on trails over the summer and found it very comfy and a shoe that handled lots of miles. They were then looking for a fall replacement.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 62 days ago
Light and bouncy on a 9 km first run; didn't feel restrictive for mild overpronation, though sizing runs small.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 63 days ago
50 km review from a large runner with unstable ankles coming from stable neutrals.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 85 days ago
They say wearing these shoes gave them patella tendon problems.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 91 days ago
The Hurricane 26 destroyed their feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 95 days ago
Their absolute favourite running shoe; owned two pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 102 days ago
Chunky and rather short; returning them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 104 days ago
A 66-year-old's latest favourite max-cushion shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 104 days ago
Fits better than the Hurricane 26: less heel slip, more toe room, simpler lacing.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 110 days ago
They call it a great stability shoe that keeps them slow and helped with their knee pain, though they would not recommend it to anyone wanting a soft cushioned ride.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
One run in: noticeably lighter than the Hurricane 25 for its cushion and stability.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 144 days ago
Loved them, but the toe box was too narrow for their foot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 148 days ago
Loved them over 450 miles including a marathon and a half.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 161 days ago
So far so good as an easy and recovery shoe with mild stability.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 181 days ago
An amazing stability trainer that helped them recover from an IT band injury over 108 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 190 days ago
Gave them awful blisters on both arches.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 198 days ago
They tried the Arahi 8 and it blistered their feet in places they never expected, which has made them wary of Hoka.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 201 days ago
Greatly disappointed: horrible blisters on the sides of their feet after 30–50 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 202 days ago
Likes them but struggles with shin splints when building mileage.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 208 days ago
Has come to hate them after 250+ miles of running.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 232 days ago
A 54-year-old pronator after 3-4 runs of 3-6 miles finds the Structure Plus more comfortable and cushioned than the Structure 25 with real stability and assured cornering, but with notably less bounce and energy return than the Vomero Plus.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 244 days ago
This runner loves the Structure Plus for long, slow runs; it helps their hammer toe and speeds recovery.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 293 days ago
Bought in 4E despite disliking the look, they love its stability compared with other shoes that felt jittery.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 307 days ago
Their 860 v14 turned hard and uncomfortable after about 350 km and left them with hip pain, whereas an older v12 lasted 950 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 308 days ago
They love it: it revived their ability to run daily miles despite nagging injuries.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 313 days ago
6–10 mile easy runs: it kept their foot stable and them pain-free even on bad roads, but they can only recommend it for pain or pronation issues at the price.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 363 days ago
Uses the Kayano 32 for the guidance they need; it's their long and recovery tank.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 365 days ago
An overpronator who currently runs in them and finds them great for their wide, stable base.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 367 days ago
Has really been liking the Supernova Solution 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 370 days ago
They really like the Structure 26 but feel the heel is slightly too firm.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 377 days ago
Since upgrading from the Hurricane 24 to the 25 they get arch and posterior tibialis pain, which eases when they switch back.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 383 days ago
They used this road shoe for lots of trail running over the year, mostly on dry mild trails, and found it great.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 383 days ago
They run roads in the Guide 18 alongside a Kayano and say the shin splints they suffered badly with in the Hoka Arahi cleared up after switching to these stability shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 405 days ago
A beginner overpronator found the Hurricane 25 perfect for stability and comfort after the Ghost Max and Adrenaline GTS 24 fell short.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 405 days ago
For a beginner overpronator the Adrenaline GTS 24 was much more stable than the Ghost Max, but lacked forefoot cushion and their feet hurt after a couple of miles.
YouTube · Doctors of Running · 407 days ago
About 100 miles, with some long runs, and the soft ride has stayed consistent: the foam has not firmed up, and the midsole, outsole and upper have all held up well. They find the stability mild to moderate, with a wish for more forefoot support, and say it is not snappy and does not pick up the pace well. The forefoot is wide but low in volume, the heel counter is stiff enough to irritate some, and very wide feet may want more room.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 424 days ago
First 10K in the Hurricane 25 at 5:30–6:00/km: true to size, well-supported midfoot and heel with toe room for narrow feet, very stable even on rooty trails, generous cushioning; the upper runs warm and soaks up rain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 424 days ago
After about 40 km the Hurricane 25 is a 10/10: buttery ride, just-right cushion, smooth transition and great stability, beating several other trainers they tried this year.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 424 days ago
The Hurricane 25 is their go-to for 15–20 km easy long runs in half-marathon training.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 441 days ago
Loved the original Tempus, but lost two toenails running a marathon in the Tempus 2, which was far too narrow for them even though they don't have wide feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 463 days ago
A 4E-width runner who needs high stability uses the Beast 24 in 4E as a weekly long-run trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 463 days ago
A 4E-width runner who needs high stability uses the Gaviota 5 in 4E as a weekly long-run trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 466 days ago
A runner loves the weight and feel of the Hyperion GTS 2 and can't find a comparable replacement.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 476 days ago
Three days in, this former Structure 25 user hates the Structure 26: heel padding pushes the foot forward, the collar squeezes, the foam has little response and grip is worse; they're returning it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 485 days ago
A Structure 26 owner finds the stability fantastic for walking and light jogging, but the outsole was shredded after about 90 miles.
YouTube · Yowana · 487 days ago
A 10-mile run at about a 7:36 pace plus a second recovery-pace run, at 155 lb. They found it firmer and less bouncy than hoped at an 8:00 pace, but the rocker and 6 mm drop kept it smooth and the bounce came through at 7:30 and quicker. The upper is secure and the toe box generous. They see it as a relaxed recovery or long-run shoe rather than a fast one, and suspect it suits heavier runners better.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 487 days ago
The Supernova Solution 2 was a great travel shoe for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 493 days ago
The Structure 25 gave this runner metatarsal pain, unlike most other shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 573 days ago
For this runner, the Structure 25 was one of the rare shoes that didn't work at all.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 575 days ago
After loving two pairs of the Rincon 3 they find the Rincon 4 much stiffer and not as nice.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 578 days ago
An overpronator with high arches who ran 900 km in the Tempus 1 says the Tempus 2, after a few runs, rides the same but is more comfortable thanks to extra padding in the heel, ankle and tongue. The midsole feels a little softer after going up a half size.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 620 days ago
On a third pair of the ForeverRun Nitro: loves it but the arch glue and toebox wear out fast.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
A runner with wide flat feet recovering from posterior tibial tendonitis found the Hyperion GTS 2 amazing for track intervals: good bounce, great stability that didn't aggravate their pain, and a perfect fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 645 days ago
Loved their original ForeverRun Nitro.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 648 days ago
A longtime Adrenaline runner who needs stability for longer runs found the Glycerin GTS 21 heavy compared with the neutral version; it improved after break-in but is not a favourite.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 651 days ago
A runner who had used the Adrenaline GTS for years says the Glycerin GTS 21 felt like bricks, and returned them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 652 days ago
After three months in them with flat, wide feet, they say it works like magic and running no longer hurts.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 655 days ago
A first-time stability shoe runner coming from the Hoka Bondi 8 says the Glycerin GTS 22 caused severe arch and lower back pain within two miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 714 days ago
After 200 miles: an underrated daily trainer with mild stability and great value.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 719 days ago
Bought four pairs of the ForeverRun Nitro; over 600km on two and still great.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 741 days ago
A flat-footed orthotics wearer recovering from ankle surgery tried on 25+ pairs and found nothing compares to the Adrenaline GTS 24, calling it a godsend.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 741 days ago
Fitted on a physical therapist's advice, they couldn't choose anything else after walking in the Adrenaline GTS 24.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 758 days ago
A runner who tested both Glycerin 21 versions on a treadmill found the GTS noticeably stiffer and a little deader, and kept only the neutral one.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 759 days ago
After 12 miles, a 190 lb runner found the Hyperion GTS 2 firm and smooth with a great upper and grip, thriving at faster paces but less good when slow, with foot fatigue after 6–8 miles.
Reddit · r/running · 787 days ago
They bought the Glycerin GTS 21 after a gait assessment and used it for 20 weeks of training and their first marathon. They finished in 4:14 with no shoe complaints.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 797 days ago
A flat-footed 190 lb runner doing about 60 miles a month says the Tempus 2 feels the same as the original but fits more snugly. After a 10k and a few more runs, they find v1 more comfortable overall and wear the v2 less.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 799 days ago
A forefoot striker running about 35 miles a week, with 750+ miles on the Tempus 1, says the Tempus 2 fits like a glove after a 5-miler. The midsole feels the same but a bit firmer, and the padded upper feels slightly narrower with a roomy toe box. Still one of the best stability shoes, and their marathon workhorse.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 808 days ago
An overpronator with knee and ankle pain who could only run in the Brooks Glycerin GTS finds the Tempus 2 better: lighter, more responsive, with a better rocker and a slightly wider toe box. It's a support shoe that feels fast.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 815 days ago
A runner who had the first version has raved about the Hyperion GTS 2, saying the extra stack and new foam make it their first choice for most training runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 830 days ago
A runner moving from traditional stability shoes loves the Vongo v6 (wide) as a daily, with unobtrusive stability.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 831 days ago
Likes the ForeverRun Nitro for easy and recovery runs on tired legs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 832 days ago
500km+ review: the ForeverRun Nitro felt amazing and versatile until 300-400km, then the foam died; retired at 900km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 845 days ago
They find the Rincon 4 very stable with Mach 6-like cushion, snug fit and responsive running dynamics, and it was faster than the Mach 6 in intervals.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 929 days ago
They run on the road in the Structure 25 and say it gives their feet the right amount of support.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 935 days ago
Has high arches and says the Gaviota 5 works great for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 935 days ago
With very flat feet and a wide midfoot, the medial post dug into their arches and caused pain within minutes of leaving the store.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 937 days ago
Under 20 miles in, the soles were already breaking apart, which they found shocking for the most expensive running shoes they have bought.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 938 days ago
Has no foot problems in the Gaviota 5 and ranks it among their favorites, just behind the Kawana.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 943 days ago
With flat feet they dislike the shoe for walking but love it for running.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 947 days ago
Was fitted at a running store for very high arches and says the Gaviota 5 relieved a years-long foot pain; plans to buy another pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 954 days ago
Training for an ultra with mild bunions and wide feet, a runner did 7.5 miles in the Vongo v6 pain-free and was extremely impressed by the roomy toe box and soft ride.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 961 days ago
Agrees with the complaints and says the soles are really hard.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 967 days ago
Ran their first 50k in the Gaviota 5 and found them perfect with no blisters; fitness was the only limit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1004 days ago
After 600 miles each, the SolarBoost 5's midsole has held up better than the Pegasus 40's, and its great outsole makes it their pick for slippery, snowy days.
YouTube · kofuzi · 1017 days ago
About 100 miles, used mostly as a recovery and max-cushion shoe. It felt clunky at the heel and the upper a bit baggy at first, but the foam settled in and the ride became smooth and comfortable, so they reached for it more as the miles went on. The upper and outsole show very little wear and the grip is great. They wonder how the foam will change over the next few hundred miles, but expect it to stay steady.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1031 days ago
After about 450 miles, this runner finds the Structure 25 a solid, no-frills daily trainer, fine at tempo pace though a bit heavy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1031 days ago
An overpronator found the Structure 25's midsole correction dug painfully into their arches and switched to the Vomero 17.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1039 days ago
The Solarboost 5, bought for about $60, is nice: next to it their Pegasus 40 feels firmer, and they're enjoying running in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1040 days ago
A 1:30 half marathoner looking for a stability tempo shoe loves the Hyperion GTS concept: light and relatively stable, though they could feel the guide rails under their overpronating foot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1061 days ago
About 200 miles in the Solarboost 5: not a favourite but it improves with time, feels clunky until 2–3 miles in, and needs a runner's loop.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1091 days ago
Bought them for flat feet but they hurt a lot when walking hills and around the city, especially mid-foot and heels, so they planned to return them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1091 days ago
Wore a new pair for an 8-hour day on their feet and their feet ached badly for hours afterward.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1091 days ago
Their Gaviotas served them well through winter, though they find the Arahi a lot more comfortable and versatile.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1091 days ago
With flat feet they found the Gaviota one of the most comfortable shoes for long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 1091 days ago
They love the Paradigm 7 and use it for most of their runs. It gently guides posture when they get sloppy without feeling like an obvious stability shoe.
