Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
After 250+ miles, including several half marathons, she calls it a great daily trainer and a great upgrade: breathable, comfortable all over, durable and well made, working exceptionally well for faster mid-distance runs and part of her rotation for every speed workout. It's a little pricey, and the upper shows dirt.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A balanced, lightweight trainer with decent responsiveness that does a bit of everything, cushioned enough for long runs, and good value. One tester would like livelier foam and more forefoot width. Another tester loved the firm, neutral ride (13.5 miles without issue), but the toe box hurt until ~15 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A very well-built daily trainer that will last you miles, with long-lasting comfort, a smooth ride, a stylish look and an upper that delivers on many levels. It can wear many hats but falls short when you want a PR. Despite the 'max' name it's firmer than expected and less soft than rivals.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Excellent cushioning for fans of firm rockers: great for easy rhythmic miles, stable for a neutral shoe thanks to good sidewalls, and a good walking and standing shoe. The foam lacks pop at speed, the laces bite through the tongue, and at $180 it lacks rivals' versatility. Too firm for some.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester sees it as an improvement on the Cloudeclipse and a redemption after v2 flop: a nicer, more dialed-in upper, no loud speedboard, a smooth ride, the same $180. Another tester, on his first On, was impressed: good-looking, a pleasant ride, and minimal wear after 50+ miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A good daily trainer for up to 5 miles: lightweight, breathable and durable, with little to no wear after well over 100 miles. The midsole falls short on longer runs, and it runs small. She loves it most for all-day wear and walking, and recommends it for people who stand all workday.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
One tester: a nice training shoe with good rhythm, a durable build, a steady forefoot rocker, mild-to-moderate responsiveness, good cushioning and lockdown; fair value at $160.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester: a utilitarian daily trainer at best, not the worst shoe you'll buy but not one you'll long to run in; On is treading water on innovation. An average addition that proves On's inconsistency. A third tester finds it fine but with nothing excellent: OK for 3–6 miles, then monotonous.
Blog · Startline wa doko desu ka? – Shibuken · 2 days ago
He switched into it at 15 km of a rainy overnight 100 km run and ran the last ~80 km in it. It stayed dry until ~60 km, then water seeped in at the ankle; it's not a rain boot. Amazingly, no blisters at all, even with soaked feet. Slippery on wet manholes. A buy for people who run or go out in the rain.
Blog · Rundefeated – Rizqa Lahuddin · 2 days ago
A reliable, comfortable cushioned daily trainer: Fresh Foam X that's soft without being mushy, and monsoon-proof grip on wet asphalt, tiles and painted road lines. Understated looks work for the office, and it gives ~90% of the 1080/More experience for less. Great for long runs, not for speed sessions.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Jessica O'Donnell · 2 days ago
A great high-cushion daily trainer for easy miles: soft and forgiving without being squishy, with a smooth rocker that rolls you forward, a true-to-size accommodating fit, a breathable upper and secure stretch laces. When she picked up the pace it felt too soft to respond; not for intervals or races.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A simple, soft shoe for easy running and walking: soft cushioning, a mildly flexible rocker, a wider fit, decent durability at 30 miles and solid value at $145. But the midsole bottoms out and isn't responsive, it's mostly unstable, and the heel padding irritates. Fine for walking, not for his running needs.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Ally Arcuri · 2 days ago
Simple, affordable and light at 7.2 oz: the soft DNA Loft heel absorbs landings, good for casual runs, recovery days, heel strikers and everyday wear. The thin 22 mm forefoot feels flat on uptempo moments with minimal energy return, and the high heel slightly undermines stability in sharp turns.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A classic high-drop neutral trainer with a moderate stack and flexible forefoot: a great starter shoe that won't break the bank, with a durable, reliable, very stable ride. The fit is snug and low-volume, bounce and responsiveness are unexciting, and he hoped for more; it lacks pace versatility.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Lindsay Agro · 2 days ago
One tester disliked fit and heat. Brooks hasn't messed up the gravy train: if you loved v17 and earlier, this will do the trick again, though he prefers the lower-drop Ghost Max. One tester really wanted to like it but fought it: it suits only tiny toes and little need for airflow, so it's a walking shoe for her.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 2 days ago
He really enjoyed it. He set out to test outsole durability after wearing through v7s in 190 miles, and was surprised by the much more dynamic foam. He'd like a more breathable upper that wicks rather than absorbs. A strong zero-drop daily trainer. Incentivized review.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
She liked the P35x midsole, the best foam yet, plus the lower stack and lighter weight. But Altra failed at its signature feature: the low-volume toe box with a lateral sidewall caused severe 5th MTP pain and limited her runs. A nice neutral zero-drop trainer only for narrower forefeet. $160 is a bit overpriced.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
A cushioned 4 mm-drop daily trainer with a good rhythmic rocker and firmer cushioning one tester likes, but he chewed through much of the outsole in 27 miles and the fit is slightly long. Another tester found it snug for an Altra yet stable. At $160 versatility is limited, and the forefoot lacks classic Altra width.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
Altra calls it max cushion, but to him it's a firm shoe with maximum cushioning, far less soft than the Glycerin Max or MagMax Nitro. As with the original Via Olympus there's a disconnect: a comfortable upper and impressive stack, but the EGO FLO ride undercuts it. This time he's not going with the FLO.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Markus Zinkl · 2 days ago
A genuinely good daily trainer at a really attractive price, with build quality equal to models costing €30–40 more. The upper should fit a wide range of foot shapes, and the Boost and Bounce combination surprised him. The only compromise as an all-rounder is at higher paces. Score 8.83/10.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
Adidas finally delivers a practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor heavy. The upper rivals pricier shoes: comfortable, true to size, roomy with no pressure points and an excellent heel hold. At $100 it's an incredible value under 10 oz, though he wishes the forefoot were a bit less soft and mellow.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Jim Coulson · 2 days ago
A practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor clunky, and one of the better $100 shoes he's run in a while: light, with a breathable upper, excellent rear hold and traction. Energy return is low to moderate, and he'd like a livelier forefoot. It runs half a size small. Ideal for logging long easy miles.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
Rated 95%, one of their top scores of the year: a lightweight, nicely cushioned shoe that suits many runners and lets you run without thinking about your shoe. The tweaked PWRRUN adds energy return, and the upper is super breathable. Its main drawback is a narrow midfoot fit, and the lace loops raise durability worries.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
The ground feel was strange after high-stack trainers, but he enjoyed it more with every run. A 14-miler with 4:00/km segments sold him: responsive with enough protection. It's light, with a very comfortable upper. Minor lateral outsole wear showed by 50 miles, though he still expects 300+ miles away from abrasive surfaces.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Justin Alpaugh · 2 days ago
A lightweight trainer meant for speed and short easy miles, with an affordable price and a nice upper, but it still lacks cushioning for longer days and the outsole is a weak point. He likes its simple design but says it just doesn't have a home in his rotation: even for an easy 4-miler he has more fun options.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
An extremely light plateless trainer and workout or racing shoe, with smooth, natural transitions for speedwork and a permanent spot in one tester's rotation. Midsole sidewalls add surprising guidance. The midfoot is slightly baggy, the forefoot needs breaking in, and it's too minimal beyond ~10 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Kaleb Kabakjian & Ruby Wyles · 2 days ago
One tester sees Saucony starting to make a classic of the line for the modern age: lower stack and a simpler upper, moving the right way for original fans while still suiting everyday runners. The firm-at-first foam softens after a few miles. Another tester was won over by its inherent stability and ground connection, which make her feel nimble.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Michael Mason-D'Croz · 2 days ago
No frills, just a quality shoe that gets the job done for a great price. It performed incredibly well on short quick runs, long runs and tempos, with grip that feels secure. Saucony didn't mess with a good thing, and putting it on felt like a reunion. The upper gets hot on hot runs.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
That rare bargain shoe that rides like pricier rivals: a rocker propels you forward, and one tester felt no forefoot or heel restrictions while upping tempo and enduring hard pavement with no discomfort days later. Some testers wanted more support.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
Mild tweaks rather than a reinvention: a resculpted midsole, new mesh and extra tongue and heel padding. The ride and midsole feel so similar to v4, which can be had for as little as £65, that it makes more financial sense to buy v4 now and pick up v5 once it's discounted.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A lightweight daily trainer for logging the majority of your miles, with great cushioning for its stack. The fit may be a touch narrow for some, and the flexible forefoot won't work for everyone.
Blog · Marathons.com – Clément Laborieux · 2 days ago
Not disappointing only because he expected nothing special, sad for such a historic line. It has secure lockdown, excellent durability and reliable grip, but at 300 g it's one of the heaviest daily trainers, the foam lacks responsiveness, propulsion is minimal, and it's not versatile. Nike needs more meaningful updates.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
At first it fell flat: after bouncy rivals his midfoot strikes thunked down, like a Mazda 3 after a BMW. It grew on him as a sporty all-rounder. At $145 in an age of $200 trainers it's a solid bargain and one-shoe quiver for easy runs, long runs and tempos, especially for newer runners. It remains relatively firm.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Noteworthy updates make the ride smoother and a little more energetic than v41 while keeping the feel that made it popular. It's good value, durable and comfortable for easy daily training, but unlikely to win new fans: less cushioned than rivals, heavy for a lowish stack, and not great for faster runs.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
A joy to run in from the first run, and after 100+ mi the upper shows no wear or tearing, with a soft midsole, durable outsole and good traction. The TPU plate doesn't deliver the responsiveness it promises, and rocks get stuck in the canyon-like outsole grooves.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Decent and budget-friendly, with soft, slightly bouncy FuelCell, decent breathability and wet-pavement grip, and no issues in testing. Comfort is decent rather than exceptional, the midfoot cutout collects rocks on gravel and dirt, and many shoes that cost only a little more perform far better, so they'd look elsewhere.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great shoe and still one of the best, either as an all-rounder for all your running or a speedy rotation shoe, especially for those who don't love max cushion. The upper is tweaked and the outsole improved, but the ride is much the same, so while v6 is on sale it's the better value.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
A lot like v6, in the best way: just a little cosmetic sprucing and another year of fun running in the line. The line is aging like fine wine, and one tester thinks the real deal-breaker will just be aesthetics.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger, Peter Stuart & Maya Kahana · 2 days ago
A no-nonsense, jack-of-all-trades tempo daily trainer: springy, fast and fun as the line should be, with no more durability concerns and great tongue and upper construction.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Dominique Winebaum & Michael Ellenberger · 2 days ago
One tester enjoys it more than the Ghost 15: DNA Loft v3 is softer and lighter without being mushy, the extra 3 mm of forefoot foam is more pleasant, and the geometry gives a stable, energetic ride. It's still a high-drop shoe (she'd prefer ~5 mm) and slightly heavier than its predecessor.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Chad Zimmermann & Renaldo Robinson · 2 days ago
As reliable daily trainers go, you can't do much better at $150, and it continues Brooks' long line of durability, with 36 mm stack closing the gap to the Ghost Max. But it's so close to the Ghost 16, which is 'boring' in a reliable way, that buying the 16 on sale may make more sense.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Bach · 2 days ago
One of the best Ghost midsoles yet: more versatile, so you can cruise or push the pace fairly well, a jack of all trades. It has a mildly stable platform and excellent lockdown that's slightly snug, with wide options. It's at the top end of daily-trainer pricing.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
His first Ghost in over a decade, and the 'friendliest' yet: more DNA Loft v3 foam and a lower drop make for a surprisingly efficient, enjoyable ride at a good price. If you haven't tried the Ghost in a while, there's never been a better time. The upper fits tight.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
Testers loved the balanced, supportive cushioning and smooth landing-to-push-off transition, and one said she 'loved the shoes like no other.' The soft upper is breathable, never too hot, and there are four widths. The midsole is firmer than some wanted, and some testers found the toe box slightly narrow.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Ali Ball · 2 days ago
Stylish, comfortable and versatile, possibly one of the best shoes of the year: gentle on tired legs yet responsive when the pace rises. The Speedboard rolls you forward on soft double CloudTec landings, and it shines on long steady runs. Stones no longer get stuck in the Clouds, and it's cemented a place in their rotation.
Blog · Treeline Review – Becca Downs · 2 days ago
A people-pleasing, do-it-all trainer and the most versatile On she's tested: plush, forward-rolling cushioning, breathable mesh and no durability issues after 30+ hours. It doesn't excel at anything specific and has less propulsion than the Cloudmonster, which is hard to justify at $180.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Jane McGuire · 2 days ago
A plush, stable cushioned cruiser that keeps tired legs fresh. Unlike On shoes she's found too firm for her stompy stride, she loved it for easy miles, long runs in a marathon block and everyday wear, with toe-box room in her normal size. Lockdown took tweaking, faster sessions felt like hard work, and it's pricey.
Blog · Kobasuke no Nikki – Kobasuke · 2 days ago
Brooks' superb fit, a shoe that goes slow or fast as you choose, decent ground feel and no carbon plate. Speed came easily in races and fartleks. It's more cushioned than his old Hyperion Tempo, so his soles suffered less late in a marathon. He ran a 100 km ultra in 10:49 (a PB by over an hour) without instability or blisters.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
He expected little given the big weight gain, but it's faster: top-level speed among non-plated shoes, with quick response, much more rebound and a 37 mm rocker that pushes you forward. It can hit 60 s/400 m pace yet works as a daily trainer. The heel hold is firm, so consider half a size up for daily use.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
A more democratic ride that should compete fiercely with versatile daily trainers: more cushioning underfoot and an extremely comfortable upper with a divine tongue and collar. He'd take it on medium-long runs without thinking. The layered upper runs warm and the toe box is narrow.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
The changes fundamentally shift its use: less fast than before but more comfortable underfoot. Light, versatile and breathable, soft at slow paces and responsive when going faster, it handles long runs up to ~15 miles. Speedwork ability is limited, the fit slightly snug, and it's a bit wobbly in turns.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A well-made, lightweight shoe ideal for smooth running that doesn't cost you speed, whether training or racing a triathlon. Breathable, easy on and off, with unique colours, and she loved it. The outsole is slippery on wet surfaces and the tongue rides up a little.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Alexander Walker · 2 days ago
Another tester grew to love the bold Van Gogh-style design, the contouring minimalist tongue and the subtly stabilising heel counter. One tester found it sluggish and stopped having fun, so he sees it better for light 2–6 mile easy days.
Blog · Runner's World · 2 days ago
A mile eater for easy days and weekly mileage, with a spacious toe box that wide-footed runners revel in on long, swollen-foot days and a soft, padded upper. An ideal introduction to zero drop. Not much bounce, and some testers felt the toe box rubbed their pinky toe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
The toe box is a big, classic-Altra improvement on v7. But the stiff platform feels unnatural for zero drop and needs an earlier rocker, so the ride felt stiff and unforgiving. The prominent medial sidewall caused arch pain during and after every run. Heavy for its 30 mm stack.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Kurt Biesemans · 2 days ago
A comfortable zero-drop daily trainer with a great, secure fit, solid traction and better durability (should last ~500 mi). He isn't convinced by long runs: it's firm and lacks cushioning at slower paces, but works well at faster tempos, so it joins his rotation for shorter, quicker runs.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
It runs like every other in the line, a flexible, low-stack zero-drop trainer with lots of ground feel. But the huge fit change to a low-volume, narrow toe box caused toe discomfort that limited her runs. Good only for narrow, low-volume feet, and exposed midsole wear showed at 20 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – John Calabrese · 2 days ago
The gold standard of Altra road shoes: a light, flexible zero-drop shoe that brought back fond memories. Another tester says it remains the healthiest shoe for keeping a light, flexible stride and finishing a marathon injury-free, though they'd like a bit more cushioning late in the race.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
An excellent choice for zero-drop fans who want lots of ground feel: a near-perfect fit, a natural feel and great breathability, and one of the most comfortable options for daily wear and the gym. Cushioning is poor, the use is niche, it's not ideal for high mileage, and outsole wear is a common complaint.
Blog · Road Trail Run – John Tribbia & Ben David · 2 days ago
Lighter (13 g less than v18) on a broader platform, with a breathable upper, some light trail and gravel ability thanks to the outsole, and great value at $140. It's a daily trainer, not a speedster: there's no real 'wow' factor, and one tester wanted more stack.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Caryn Just & Renaldo Robinson · 2 days ago
The supercritical PWRRUN+ midsole is where it shines, with an upper that feels like a $160–170 trainer. Long-time Ride fans won't need to change, and newcomers get a reliable daily trainer that doesn't break the bank. It can run a little big, making it feel slightly cloggy despite the low weight.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A good-value neutral daily trainer with a steady rocker and softer PWRRUN+ that's dialled in for easy days. Lockdown and traction are good, and it didn't run hot over 16 miles. It loses some of the speedy versatility of earlier versions, and the volume is a touch low through the mid/forefoot.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
Small tweaks that all feel like welcome upgrades: comfortable for miles and not overdone, with an improved outsole that fixes the Ride 18's durability blow-back. She says go for the 19 over a discounted 18. Holes in the mesh let in rocks and dirt, and wide sizes come in few colourways.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Alexander Walker · 2 days ago
For another tester, who fell in love with the 15, this update is a total miss. One tester finds it devoid of personality, a copy of a copy, though he did find the FF Blast Plus fun and responsive.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Ben David & Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
A light, lively, colourful daily trainer for summer miles at almost any pace, with a beautifully fitting upper and a fun ride that rolls with your pace. Great value at $135 and very durable. One tester wished for FF Turbo foam, and another tester wanted a touch more stack.
Blog · WearTesters – Annie Keris & Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
Light, versatile, fun and breathable, with great grip and solid lockdown from the upper, a dependable trainer, especially if you're not a big runner. It has lost some of the eccentric character behind this shoe cult following. The ride geometry may not suit overpronators, and there are no bungee laces.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A neutral workhorse daily trainer for runners who don't mind extra weight (11.2 oz). It's protective and durable but firm underfoot thanks to the extra Bounce. It's aimed at beginners and suits those sensitive to rockers. It runs long, the forefoot can be a little slappy, and he'd refine the heel collar.
Blog · Jimuin-san's Running Blog – Tanishin · 2 days ago
Chose it as a light (216 g, wide 27.0) non-carbon marathon shoe. He felt no shoe weight late in the race, no sole-of-foot pain (unlike carbon shoes) and no cramps. It is a good race option for sub-4 or sub-3.5 runners.
Blog · Jintan's Blog – Jinkei · 2 days ago
At 400 km the ride, cushion, upper and midsole are all fine. But the outsole rubber was clearly worn by 200 km, and by 400 km the heel grooves were gone and it was very slippery on wet roads. He expects ~500 km of life and won't buy it again.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown (DPT) · 2 days ago
Rated A-: a value do-it-all shoe with solid stability design elements. The ride is muted but gives some ground feel. It has a traditional HOKA fit (moderate-wide heel, snugger mid and forefoot). Personal grade B+: the drop is a bit low to use all the time.
Blog · WeeViews – Michael Young · 2 days ago
Super light for its max cushion, with classic pop for double-digit long runs. It is breathable and sheds water, and the laces lock tight. At 70 mi the outsole is already badly worn and he doubts it will reach 300 mi. The tongue is very thin.
Blog · GearJunkie – M.T. Elliott · 2 days ago
A softer midsole fixes v1's overly firm ride: zero-drop with real max cushion. It is peppy enough for pick-ups, and the fit stayed secure. After 100 mi there are only minor midsole cracks and the outsole is in good shape. The grooves pick up rocks, and it is still firmer than other max shoes.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 2 days ago
Rated A-. It does exactly what it is advertised to do: smooth transitions and a balanced, cushioned, comfortable ride. Neutral, but with heel sidewalls and a wide base. The upper is extremely comfortable for easy efforts, though wear socks because of some internal stitching.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
Less exciting than v1 but a good shoe. The new two-layer Helion fixes v1's instability on landing at the cost of a firmer feel, so don't expect the soft cushion of the original. It is pricey.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Michael Sawh · 2 days ago
'More like a step backward.' The extra cushioning is comfortable and protective, but the added weight makes it less versatile than v1. The upper fits well and accommodates longer runs, and the ride is stable and smooth. It feels like a firmer big-cushion shoe that walks well.
Blog · Shuichi Running – Shuichi Hibino · 2 days ago
'Heavier but more stable': marginally firmer, more stable and shifted towards slow jogging. Propulsion is slightly reduced, and the extra weight makes moderate efforts feel less natural. It runs large and wide, so he went a half size down. Outsole durability looks unchanged from v1.
Blog · Marathon Handbook – Alex Cyr · 2 days ago
A workout shoe disguised as a recovery sneaker: Helion foam and a plate give more pop than an easy-run shoe, with tons of support and a long lifespan. At 10.4 oz it is heavy, and it is tall and wide.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger · 2 days ago
The upper is comfortable and secure, and the natural foot shape works well, but that comfort is betrayed by the midsole. It is not the soft, bouncy ride you'd expect from a 'max' shoe; it is too firm.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Alex, Tim · 2 days ago
'Long and easy but not more than that.' Stiff and heavy (310 g), but the balanced cushioning, rocker and foot shape made easy runs enjoyable. The pair ran short. Note: Altra sponsored a video on their YouTube channel; the article itself is not sponsored.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
The wide toe box was extremely comfortable on runs over seven miles. Uphills felt cumbersome at first, then almost effortless. It proved durable, with excellent grip and good breathability, though it may be too wide for narrow feet.
Blog · T3 – Kieran Alger · 2 days ago
'Looks deceive.' Despite the big-stack styling, the ride is very firm, dense and rocker-driven rather than soft and bouncy. It feels heavy and clunky for a do-it-all trainer. The upper is comfortable, and fans of firm shoes like the Adistar may get on with it.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Brady Burman-Magday, Sam Edgin, Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
One tester calls it, with the Vanish Tempo, his favourite Altra road shoe. It is comfortable and smooth, and at 8.15 oz it is an easy recommendation for a wide-toe-box daily trainer.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown (DPT) · 2 days ago
A nimble, versatile 4 mm daily trainer with a soft but not too soft foam. He has no inherent design complaints. He would like a little more flex between midfoot and forefoot.
Blog · Canadian Running – Keeley Milne · 2 days ago
Became her go-to for everyday mileage. It is light and responsive, and the smooth rocker works for recovery jogs and progression runs. The EGO PWR foam adds gentle bounce, and the fit is classic Altra: roomy toes, locked heel.
Blog · Runner's World – Catherine Crowley · 2 days ago
A marathoner who usually runs in high-drop stability shoes. The wide toe box ended her usual post-run foot soreness, the foam felt soft and responsive on hills, and the upper stayed cool in summer heat. It became her go-to shoe.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Larry Lam · 2 days ago
A good, stable, well-built daily trainer for beginner to intermediate runners. It isn't soft enough for a high-stack shoe, the toe box is tight, and $170 is more than it should cost.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
A max-cushioned daily trainer that doesn't veer into overly plush. It feels stable and durable for long runs and heavier runners. The thick padding makes it less breathable, and it lacks pop for picking up the pace.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
Personal grade A-. It returns to what he loved about versions 20 and 21: lighter and more responsive, with a true superfoam feel and a secure fit. The toe box is slightly narrow, and after only 30 mi he is already wearing through the exposed foam.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 6.5. Generous but not excessive cushioning makes it a reliable shoe for slow and easy runs. It lacks reactivity once the pace picks up.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
95%. Still one of their go-tos despite lacking bells and whistles: a durable, really comfortable shoe that checks all their boxes, especially at its price.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A solid, versatile daily trainer with a better-fitting, quality upper, a smooth collar lining, excellent heel lockdown and a true-to-size, accommodating fit. Lighter than before. Not a big upgrade over the Ride 17, and there's no forefoot rocker.
Blog · Harlerunner – Thomas · 2 days ago
'Perfect all-rounder', 5/5: a safe bet for nearly every session, from an easy half-marathon long run to hill intervals. Good fit, weight and cushioning, and a bit more padding. Barely different from the Ride 17, so a cheap v17 is a fine alternative. Firmly in his rotation.
Blog · Daily Running Co. – Dean · 2 days ago
A stable, protective, comfortable workhorse: the upper is pristine, and the PWRRUN+ foam has moulded to his stride, with surprising rebound when picking up the pace. Not agile or nimble. The exposed midsole foam shows wear in the forefoot and lateral heel, which could shorten its life.
Blog · Run & Smile – Roman · 2 days ago
A modern do-it-all trainer: true to size, comfy fit, sticky grip even on wet roads and light trail, no visible wear at 100 km. Firm at first but softened. Best from easy to half/marathon pace; too firm for recovery and not for the track. Laces too stretchy.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
A balanced ride that prioritizes stability and control, with decent elastic response at push-off. The upper is heavily revised (7.5): engineered fabric replaces the more 'plasticky' feel of the past for a softer, more natural fit.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Courtney Kelly · 2 days ago
A very plush upper and pricing on par with competitors. The ride is firm, and it's heavier than rivals.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 2 days ago
A-/A-. One tester: a slightly firmer but responsive rockered ride that works for long, easy and uptempo runs, with a stable-neutral A for stability thanks to high sidewalls. Great, surprisingly breathable upper with no heel rubbing. Firmer than the stack suggests, and the tongue is thin.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
87%. A big leap over the original: a max-stack shoe that keeps its form, so legs feel good with little energy lost to the foam. Decent bounce, a roomy but secure fit and a breathable upper. High stack and slightly firm, weak at tempo/threshold, lacks forefoot pop, pricey.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Brooks' only lightweight daily model, with moderate cushioning, a nice bounce and the familiar Ghost fit, at the same price as the Ghost 18. Underwhelming as a tempo-up shoe.
Blog · Canadian Running – Hayden West · 2 days ago
Well done, Brooks: DNA HYPE foam plus the new rocker give a supportive, responsive and secure ride. Comfortable and capable on easy runs and faster efforts alike, it quickly earned a place in his regular rotation.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A good daily trainer and his pick of the Brooks lineup (he'd buy it over the Ghost 18) unless you want max cushion. In this competitive category, though, he'd buy the bouncier Novablast 6 or the lighter Deviate Pure Nitro first.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
B+. The bouncier midsole holds up well across paces, it's durable and the fit is secure. Stiff initially and needs a break-in, fits short with a tapered toe box, firmer than expected, and the heel tab curves in.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger, Courtney Kelly, Jen Schmidt · 2 days ago
Scores 9.6/9.3/8.35. One tester: 'my kind of shoe', a big leap over traditional Brooks trainers. Easy runs are comfortable, steady runs natural, and it responds to strides. A potential workhorse. Several testers would prefer 8 mm over 6 mm drop, and it's not a dedicated long-run cruiser.
Blog · Run Lab – Rukku · 2 days ago
Recommended for runners who value a balance of shock absorption and stability, and for relaxed-pace long runs. But at the same price the FuelCell Rebel v5 beats it for both performance and lightness.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Much-improved cushioning that is soft but not too soft, with a strong heel hold. Specialized for gentle easy-pace running. Propulsion is restrained, it feels a bit heavy (the high collar transmits the weight when lifting the foot), and the price rose ¥2,200.
Blog · RunActu – Yoann · 2 days ago
Versatility regained: perfect for a runner who wants one pair, from 45-minute jogs to 90-minute runs with pace blocks, with dynamism that doesn't cost comfort. The outsole and upper still look new after 100 km. Slightly heavy for very short track intervals.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Matt Kolat · 2 days ago
Score 8.65. A comfortable, dependable daily trainer that feels lighter than its weight suggests. Still relatively heavy for its cushioning level, and completely neutral despite the broad platform, so not for runners with any stability needs.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
A noticeable update: lighter and fresher, with a lighter, breathable Primeweave upper and room for her toes this time. The wide base adds stability, and the outsole doesn't look like it will wear down fast. It runs big (go half a size down), the laces are very short, and it can feel bulky.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
A-. A pleasant surprise that 'rights the ship' of this shoe line: lighter, more stable and more durable than v2. Balanced cushioning and a stable neutral ride for consistent daily miles. Cons: short laces, very low forefoot volume and a slight posterior heel flare.
Blog · Esco a Correre – Simone · 2 days ago
It surprises again: the perfect single shoe for runners up to the half marathon, at its best for easy 8-10 km runs, with a responsive midsole for some pickups. He wouldn't use it for marathon long runs, especially if you weigh over 75 kg.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Score 7. Very 'democratic': no extreme strengths or obvious flaws. It suits newer runners who need one trainer for slow runs through workouts. The new ReactX doesn't change the familiar feel. Wear after 150 km only at his usual spots, with 600-700 km expected for runners up to ~75 kg.
Blog · Shishiga Blog · 2 days ago
A versatile jogging shoe that also handles race pace in build-up runs. Light-feeling despite its weight, breathable, with a durable-looking outsole. Replacing his 900 km Ghost 15, he was very satisfied and recommends it to anyone stuck choosing a jog shoe.
Blog · Negibozu's running diary · 2 days ago
His main training shoe: ReactX cushion and rebound make running fun, and at nearly 400 km it is still going strong with only some sole wear. The downside: runners who dislike soft, squishy modern foam should try it first.
Blog · Papiran · 2 days ago
His 'partner' for a sub-4: jogs, 5:40/km pace runs, 20 km runs and a 3-hour LSD, ending in a 3:57 at the Kumamoto Castle Marathon. Soft but propulsive and stable when legs tire. Light enough for the first 100 km of use, but he raced in the EVO SL.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
A classic that holds steady: still feels good after 300 miles thanks to its durable build, and is a reliable daily trainer if you liked the 40. Few changes, so don't expect the older feel of the line. Narrow like most Nikes, with no wide option noted.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Alice Barraclough · 2 days ago
Seriously comfy and stylish, with a sock-like Primeknit fit and solid lockdown, and 30% lighter than v22. Still relatively heavy, so they found it best for easy, relaxed runs rather than anything fast.
Blog · Irontwit – John Sutton · 2 days ago
His 'strong and stable' main shoe. Despite past Achilles issues he had no injuries in the 10 mm drop. The upper hasn't sagged, the midsole is still springy at 800 miles, and the Continental outsole grips on gravel towpaths. Heel wear only. The knit upper runs warm.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Joost de Raeymaeker · 2 days ago
Soft, light and surprisingly versatile. It handled easy jogs, hill repeats and pickups, the upper breathed in midday heat, and long runs left him fresh. Scores 9-9.5 across ride, fit, durability and value. A plateless shoe that earns a permanent rotation spot.
Blog · The Running Club – Matteo Rocca · 2 days ago
Score 7.2. Light, comfortable and fluid for moderate paces (4:30-5:30/km) and long runs, but softer than v4. Stability drops below ~4:15/km and in quick turns. Best for runners under 80 kg. Normal wear at 150 km, estimated 500-600 km life.
Blog · Runnea UK – Gorka Cabañas · 2 days ago
9.5/10. The most complete Rebel yet: comfortable at 5:15/km, livelier at 4:30 and still keeping up at 3:45. Below 3:30/km you feel the lack of a plate. Very light, fun and suits more runners than ever. Not the fastest or most durable.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
Light, versatile and fun, with more cushion than v4. The bounce lasted to nearly 80 miles (v4 faded at about half that). The midsole is heavily creased, but the outsole is bulletproof and wet grip is fine. Probably not a 500-mile shoe, but still good value.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 3 days ago
A daily trainer 'with an extra gear'. For runners under ~70 kg the firmer midsole adds responsiveness; for heavier runners Fresh Foam X is a nice balance of softness and pop.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+/A- (personal A-): despite a stiffer heel counter and slightly tapered toe box, the ride and fit have been excellent for mileage and all-day wear.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
'A real surprise': like a trimmed-down SC Trainer, quality at a low price that one tester recommends to beginners and seasoned marathoners alike.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
A well-cushioned budget trainer that's great at easy-to-moderate paces, and an inexpensive way to try a plated shoe. Not the best shoe in their test, but a great partner for specific users.
Blog · Runner’s World · 3 days ago
Cushioning that isn't too soft or slow; testers could still crank out fast miles, and generous rubber has impressed on durability. The forefoot felt thin past 12 miles for one tester. Not a first choice for speedwork.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+/A-: he loves the upper, but the midfoot isn't stable enough for him to get the most out of the shoe. Durability is fair over 35 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger, Caryn Just · 3 days ago
One tester kept lacing it up day after day: a max-cushion trainer that looks and feels great, and it stays in her rotation. A winner with a fun, forgiving ride.
Blog · Treeline Review – Becca Downs · 3 days ago
After a year of testing they call it the best road shoe you can get right now: balanced max cushion with a responsive midsole, comfortable and versatile from daily runs and workouts to long runs and light trails. Pricey at $180.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
A polished first-gen trainer: if he could pick only one On training shoe, it'd be this. It blocks ground feel completely and his legs recover faster. More cushion than the Cloudsurfer.
Blog · Daily Running Co. – Dean · 3 days ago
Durable and well-made: the upper shows zero wear and is among the most comfortable they've tested, and the outsole barely wore. The foam lost some plushness, and for this mid/forefoot striker the geometry now feels clunky. Best for heel strikers up to the half marathon.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Solid and good value, but he 'wouldn't pick it up' for his own rotation. There are better options for whatever you want, like the Evo SL at a similar price, which is more comfortable and more responsive. It may suit fans of high-drop trainers with more ground feel.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+/A-. One tester: a solid, durable neutral trainer with firmer, more responsive Dreamstrike+ foam and great value at $140. Another tester likes the midsole feel, but the toe spring and stiff midfoot didn't fit her foot (B-). It's clunky until broken in at ~20-30 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray · 3 days ago
'Accidentally ordered decaf' (performance C). The upper and fit are near the top of the category, but one tester can't get past the boxy feel, and you can get the same ride or better elsewhere. The rigid, blocky midsole doesn't feel 'super'. Fine if you love On and have the budget.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Ali Ball · 3 days ago
Comfortable, forgiving and stable for easy and longer miles, but not speedy, and v2 does the same for £40 less. She'd pick the Hoka Skyward X any day. It needs a stiffer forefoot and a peppier ride.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
'Not worth the hype': it's easy to find shoes that offer more for less, like the Superblast. The Endorphin Speed 4, Hoka Mach 6 and Rebel v4 are more enjoyable and much cheaper.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jessica Downey · 3 days ago
She genuinely enjoyed it for slow, steady miles and loves the look. But it doesn't feel dramatically different from other big-cushion trainers and doesn't live up to the 'Hyper' name for speed or lightness. Better value exists if price matters.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+ and A-. One tester's favorite super trainer, a 'training mileage monster' with a rhythmic, bouncy forefoot. Another likes its durability and centered stability but finds it firm for the category, with a slightly long fit. $220 is steep.
Blog · Biegowy Wariat · 3 days ago
Worth its 1,000+ zł price: fun on fast sections, versatile for training and racing, and it leaves legs fresh for the next session. No foam degradation after 300 km. He recommends it 100%.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Karl Fernandez · 3 days ago
One tester 14/15, another tester 12/15. A highly versatile daily trainer with a better upper than the Evo SL, a ride more stable and bouncy than the Novablast 5, and better durability than the Rebel v5. Nothing comes close at $140. It runs narrow and takes a while to break in.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B to B+ overall: a no-frills, durable mileage trainer at a fair $140. One tester liked the fit and wider forefoot, but its 10 mm drop and clunky heel keep it off her easy-run lineup. Another tester felt a medial bias from the narrow platform and the foam compressed a little by 30 miles.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 3 days ago
'FUN' in one word, and highly recommended for short-to-mid workouts, track work and fun runs. The midfoot and toe box are narrow, so try before buying if you have high-volume feet. The high-wear area is already wearing at 65 mi; he projects ~300 mi.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
'An instant favorite' and a big upgrade on v3: great value and a high performer that will suit many runners perfectly. He'll be recommending it widely. His only advice is to wait for Puma's frequent sales.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
9.5/10. A versatile daily trainer with comfort and durability that make it easily worth the money, and it performed well even for a larger runner. The outsole looks built to last. Not a great option for wide feet.
Blog · Akiaki blog – akiaki · 3 days ago
After 1,000 km: no quirks, easy to use for everything from jogs to pace runs, and strong value on sale. Cushioning has clearly dropped, the outsole is worn on the outer edge and the upper is starting to tear. Now a backup shoe, but he would wear it again.
Blog · Runshu – Shuichi Hibino · 3 days ago
Durability is 'poor, critically so for a daily trainer'. The midsole was heavily creased and the cushioning gone by 400 km, the upper holed at ~300 km, and the shoe felt tilted. It also rides firm and heavy. He retired it and never bought a second pair.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
Grades mostly B to C. One tester found the ZoomX only moderately responsive, with a clunky heel and lugs worn by 30 miles. Another tester got burning hot spots from the high-volume upper on every run and won't run in it again.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Robbe Reddinger · 3 days ago
One tester wants to love it but craves more forefoot cushion, and he'd take the NB Rebel v4 instead. It works under 10 miles but isn't his pick for 16-20 milers. Nike made 'a great shoe for 2020, not a great shoe for now'.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nike's most versatile trainer and the overdue successor to the Pegasus Turbo, enjoyable for many kinds of runs. The rubber looks durable after 40 miles.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger · 3 days ago
Perhaps the best do-it-all or one-shoe travel option. It handled a hard 19-miler with near super-shoe spring late in the run, and progression tempos. No outsole or midsole wear after 100 miles, and the upper is getting more comfortable.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Tim, Ivan · 3 days ago
Both love the soft, smooth ride and the comfortable, breathable upper. It won't enter his rotation because it is too unstable for him, though he calls it a huge step forward for On.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Jenny Bozon · 3 days ago
Best in Test: soft but not mushy, light (213g) and snappy, and she reaches for it for track speedwork as well as long runs. The padded heel is kind to her Achilles. No outsole wear after 70+ km.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Nathan (DPTs) · 3 days ago
One tester (A- overall) found it a light 8.6 oz daily trainer that moves into uptempo work well. Another tester found it soft and hard to pick up the pace in. Mild instability from the softness and flexibility kept one tester off longer runs. The outsole was intact at 35 miles.
Blog · Weeviews – Michael Young · 3 days ago
A big redo over the v12: a new upper that no longer loosens, slightly better rain grip, and very little wear at ~80 miles. The upper runs a little hot.
Blog · Men’s Fitness UK – Kieran Alger + Steve Wright · 3 days ago
Super-plush, protective comfort for easy and recovery miles. Kieran found it less lively and versatile than the v12. Steve says it's still his favourite trainer after 400 miles, with no upper splitting and good tread.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
A lively, stable, well-cushioned do-it-all trainer, and the new rubber outsole fixes the durability problems of v4/v5. One tester found it snug and narrow, and another tester's toe box felt baggy.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it a comfortable, light and versatile daily trainer with enough pop for fast finishes. It runs narrow, is less bouncy than the Rebel v4 and lacks the propulsion of a plate for long speed work.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
One of Hoka's best geometries: bouncy EVA and a smooth rocker that work from easy to fast. The fit is snug and tapered (go up a half size), laces dig in late in long runs, and one tester saw fast heel wear.
Blog · Treeline Review · 3 days ago
Light, responsive and great for speed work, almost like a cushioned racing flat. One tester was comfortable on long runs. Another tester (hip arthritis) found the cushion too thin past 2-3 miles, and the exposed foam is a durability worry.
Blog · Stefan läuft – Stefan · 3 days ago
Stefan calls it his favorite road shoe, versatile from roughly 6:00/km long runs to 3:50/km intervals, with no blisters and still not “done” at 1,000 km. It is less comfortable than a Clifton and somewhat slippery on wet or icy ground.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas · 3 days ago
Thomas calls it an excellent, durable multi-use trainer at $120. The Lightstrike Pro puck sits under the ball of the foot; the materials are entry-level, the outsole rubber is ordinary, and the fit is not for wide feet.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
A fun, simple lightweight trainer and workout shoe: firmer but snappy, great for tempos and intervals, and durable. The tongue slides, heel lockdown is so-so, and one tester couldn't feel the Lightstrike Pro.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry calls it “good, but not great”: acceptable for short runs, but firm, dull and hard to enjoy beyond 10K, without punch when he held faster paces. He preferred rivals such as the Velocity Nitro, Mach 5 and Rebel v3.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Split verdict. One tester (8.95) and another tester (8.6) see a classic, durable do-it-all trainer with a great upper and outsole. A third tester (5/10) found it flat, lumpy and uninspiring, with a bruised forefoot on longer runs.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe, Thomas · 3 days ago
Robbe and Thomas call it a blue-collar workhorse daily trainer, with a secure upper, softer React than v38 and excellent grip. They note a narrow toe box, less pop from the forefoot Zoom unit and dull colorways.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown, Bach Pham · 3 days ago
A versatile, reliable neutral trainer with a more stable heel than v37/38. Both found it narrow with a low-volume toe box, and one tester had to lace-lock it. Overall A-.
Blog · Hebereke no Hashiru Sekai – hebereke555 · 3 days ago
Hebereke reports exceptional durability: at 2,000 km the upper has only small splits and most outsole rubber remains intact. The midsole is tired, but the Air units still cushion, making it a strong value.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
Nathaniel Bailey found it firm-ish but peppy and very versatile, with standout wet traction and great value. The midfoot is narrow, stability is limited, and the thin laces are hard to untie.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas, Robbe · 3 days ago
A sleeper hit: the full-length Lightstrike Pro gives a smooth, snappy ride at $130. It runs narrow, one tester got a hot spot near his big toe, and there is no support for pronators.
Blog · Running Scientist – Runshu · 3 days ago
Runshu describes a durable, versatile daily trainer with excellent wet grip. He retired it at 910 km after it began tilting laterally. The midfoot is slightly loose, and the laces come undone easily.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Near-unanimous praise as the best do-it-all unplated trainer, with the wider platform adding stability. One tester misses the flex and ground feel of v2/v3, another tester finds wet-road grip a bit weak, and a third tester found it slightly loose on narrow feet.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas, Meaghan, Ryan · 3 days ago
Light, cushioned enough for double-digit runs, and fun on back-to-back days. One tester had to cinch the roomy throat for his narrow foot, called the tongue cheap, and raised midsole-durability concerns. Another tester needed a break-in period.
Blog · biglongrun – Drew · 3 days ago
In a multi-shoe history post, Drew rated it 6/10: as his weight increased, the midsole bottomed out, so he retired it early. The fit was borderline loose, offering a useful perspective from a heavier runner.
Blog · A Mile. A Minute. – Anthony Chevalier · 3 days ago
Anthony Chevalier names it his shoe of the year: light, bouncy and fun at any pace.
Blog · Six Minute Mile – Brian Metzler · 3 days ago
Brian Metzler calls it a do-everything trainer for easy, long and up-tempo days. It feels very roomy on narrow feet and may not be a high-mileage workhorse.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it a light, fun and versatile unplated trainer that handled track sessions and a 15-miler equally well, with good wet grip. Narrow-footed runners may find the fit loose.
RunningRecs · Dave M · 6 days ago
Got these to replace my old running shoes that were pretty much falling apart. Felt comfortable right from the first run, didn't even need to break them in. No blisters or heel rubbing so far, which is always a plus. Cushioning is nice and soft but not overly squishy. I mostly use them for easy runs around the neighborhood and they've been great for that.
RunningRecs · Carmen · 6 days ago
I tried taking these on longer runs and honestly, didn't really work for me. Up to 10k they're great, feel light and fast and the upper is really comfortable. But once I got past 15k my feet started hurting. Just not enough cushioning for that kind of distance, at least for me. The outsole is wearing down pretty quickly too, especially under the forefoot. I still like them for shorter, faster runs but I use something more cushioned for my long runs now.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 8 days ago
They call the Pegasus a reliable platform for dumping miles, with a pair of 39s showing only minor wear after hundreds of miles.
RunningRecs · Kasia W. · 11 days ago
Bought these in 2E for easy days and my long Sunday run. Fit is the best thing about them. Roomy toe box, soft knit, the tongue stays put, no blisters even past 25 km. The ride is a different story. Soft enough when you step in, but not much comes back, and on frosty mornings the foam goes noticeably harder for the first few km. In July my feet cooked a bit in the knit.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
A wide-footed runner finds Altra awesome and currently runs roads in the Escalante 4.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
With a EEE-wide foot, finds the Rebel v4 fits very well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 24 days ago
Retired after 1,100 km with some sole wear.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
A mixed bag: lovely soft, resilient foam, but a heavier upper and a long, narrow fit even in wide.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 28 days ago
One tester logged about 20 miles over four runs, including an all-out 5K, and another about 60 km of easy, steady and long runs. One found a comfortable, stable, lively-enough ride with a durable-looking outsole but little bounce at 5K pace; another found it firmer than average, a little thin under the forefoot and short on punch when pushing the pace. They see a dependable daily trainer rather than a standout.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
Started falling apart around 400 km.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 32 days ago
Moved to the zero-drop Torin 9 and found the transition smooth, with their stride shifting naturally to midfoot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 36 days ago
Disliked them for running; now only walks in them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Enjoyed the Triumph 23 and found it a good, steady shoe for their long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Liked them a lot on first acquaintance.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 42 days ago
Loving them on the roads, though wants a trail option.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
Great feel, soft and comfortable without being too cushy.
