Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · FueledByLOLZ – Hollie · 2 days ago
A long-time fan of the line: Salomon kept the ride that worked and improved the fit, so it feels more secure and easier to trust on long days. Protective without feeling heavy, with good Contagrip traction even on wet light trails; still fine after ~100 miles. An easy-day and long-run workhorse.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Lightweight for its max cushioning, with good foam, decent transitions and good versatility. But the midfoot feels undercut with a lateral squeeze, and lateral sole flaring pushes him medially, which limits long-run use and makes it less fun for him. Good value if the geometry and fit work for you.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Kristin Lassen · 2 days ago
Comfortable and buoyant: a cushioned, responsive midsole that feels soft at first but firmer when running, a secure midfoot, a protective gusseted tongue and a grippy, durable outsole. A great all-rounder for neutral runners, though something firmer suits fast intervals. Heel support isn't great.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A light, plush, high-drop max-cushion trainer with surprising responsiveness and little rocker, versatile from easy and long miles to uptempo. It does its job very well. But it's as neutral as it gets, too unstable for another tester beyond shorter runs, and the exposed outsole was wearing and tearing by 30 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A solid max-cushion trainer with no real weaknesses: a really durable outsole, good stability, deep cushioning, a comfortable locked-down upper and outstanding reflectivity, premium and well built. But it lacks excitement and energy return, and it's pricier than rivals. Less fun than the Neo Vista 2.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Bach Pham · 2 days ago
A tank-like build with a comfortable fit and huge expected durability, but very stiff and firm. The two foams didn't mesh at first; after 20 miles it runs middle of the road, moderately cushioned and leaning firm. The heel doesn't clear cleanly, the fit is slightly loose, and in a crowded category he can't rank it high.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
The softest, bounciest Mizuno midsole she's tried and her current favourite, able to pick up the pace. Another tester finds the underfoot feel amazing but the upper so narrow and low-volume that at $180 he'd look elsewhere unless you have a narrow foot. A third tester sees lots of potential in the foams.
Blog · Negibozu's Running Diary – Negibozu · 2 days ago
A sub-3 ultra runner and fan of the line: a ~21 km half marathon confirmed it as a highly polished jog shoe, comfortable on recovery jogs and long runs with high cushioning and a rocker, with little change from the excellent v10. Concerns: outsole durability, slippery wet grip, and a rocker not for everyone.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A really comfortable flagship daily trainer: a softer, lighter upper, a smooth, easy-rolling transition and plenty of cushioning, stable for a neutral shoe, best for easy and long runs or walks. But by 80 miles he'd chewed through the exposed outsole, and the midsole flattens early for heavy runners.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
Judged in a vacuum it would get pretty decent grades for value and performance (not looks). But with so many solid $140–170 shoes, including HOKA's own Clifton Pro, it's hard to give it the respect its consistent quality deserves. His verdict: just a good shoe, not bad but not great.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
One of his favourite daily trainers to start the year: a highly cushioned, firm but protective rocker with a snappy forefoot, a comfortable, secure upper and very stable geometry. No outsole wear at 50 miles, so durability justifies the price. Some will find it too firm, and the upper may run warm.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester loved the original, but Brooks stripped away the magic and fun: still a solid max-cushion option for fans of a firmer ride and aggressive rocker, yet a step in the wrong direction. Another tester agrees it's a sophomore slump, heavier and firmer than expected. A perfectly fine shoe, but well short of v1.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Made for loyal buyers of the line and anyone wanting an uncomplicated, comfortable daily driver: soft premium upper, durable outsole and a very stable ride. He enjoys it, but next to modern trainers the DNA Tuned ride is plain vanilla and not springy.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
One of his favourite daily trainers so far this year: a smooth, consistent, rhythmic ride at easy paces without a big rocker, balanced cushioning, and a much more accommodating upper that's plush but breathable. It's not the most versatile, and at $175 he'd like more range, but it could be worth it for easy days only.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Karl Fernandez & Caryn Just · 2 days ago
A reliable daily trainer in a sea of reliable daily trainers: not versatile, and undercut by the lighter, cheaper Glycerin Flex. The midsole mostly absolves a hot upper, but $175 is a lot for a one-trick workhorse; one tester suggests last year's on sale. Another tester: a heavy shoe with a rather standard ride.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A stable neutral run/walk shoe with a smooth rocker that takes orthotics, is highly durable and is far more runnable than before. The tapered toe box makes it run half a size short. The midsole is firmer and less responsive than he'd like, and the lateral heel wall took 15–20 miles to break in.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
Not the most exciting shoe to review, but one tester has never had a bad run in any of the four versions: a great easy-mile cruiser with a firmer feel, a great rocker and noticeable improvements, graded A. Another tester finds it the best Ghost and more fun than v18, but since nothing revolutionary changed, he'd hunt for a discounted v3.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas & Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
A springy super trainer, very stable for its 46 mm stack, with a momentous ride when you engage the rocker. One tester loves it for uptempo long runs but finds the stiff midfoot bumpy at easy paces. Another tester: a protective, responsive tempo or long-run shoe, even a marathon racer if super shoes feel unstable.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann, Meaghan Murray & Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
ASICS defied the odds by improving both fit/comfort and the ride, and it was a blast to run in, though $190 makes value questionable. Still a great shoe and a clean, confident upgrade, but super trainer of the year is a tougher case in a stacked market with strong cheaper rivals. A third tester agrees.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
One of the most comfortable shoes he's tested this year, with a super smooth ride, padded landings, a luxurious upper and good stability. But it's heavy by today's standards and feels cumbersome, the outsole wears down fast, and at $180 it's way overpriced. He'd rather wear it to the gym or casually than run in it.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
A daily trainer that positively surprised him after 150 km: comfortable on easy, recovery and longer runs, and a reliable, affordable option at €140 for many runners. The foam's responsiveness is moderate, and picking up the pace is limited more by weight and bulk than by the midsole. Final score 7.1.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
The best mid-range daily trainer he's tested all year and a treat to run in, a big surprise after the bland first version. It has a balanced, energetic ride for a wide range of paces, deep cushioning and a forefoot rocker for long runs, plus a durable outsole. The upper is a bit too built up, and heavy overpronators may find it unstable.
Blog · Alastair Running – Alastair Dixon · 2 days ago
On's best shoe yet for everyday runners doing real marathon training, a plated super trainer 4:00–5:00 marathoners can race in. It's durable, stable and protective over big mileage, with energy that doesn't just absorb impact. The heel bevel and forefoot rocker roll tired legs along, which felt noticeably less beaten up after long runs.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
A max-but-not-over-max trainer done right: deep, reactive, friendly cushioning, a flexible propulsive plate, impeccable straight-tracking stability, and friendly at any pace with a smooth rocker off a broad, stable heel. Traction and expected durability are strong. It's heavy, by deliberate choice, and the upper could shed weight.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
One tester fits its 4–5 hour marathon target perfectly and had high hopes for Chicago, but after 20+ mi doubts he'll wear it again: not comfy enough for easy days, not snappy enough for tempo, too stiff and heavy for long runs. Another tester finds it overbuilt for racing, had a pinky-toe hot spot, and would buy the S/Lab Spectur.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
He likes a lot: resilient ZoomX, excellent lockdown and comfort, a good outsole and stability, doing everything he wants from a daily trainer, and it's the one to buy. But it's heavy, the tongue is annoying, and amid lighter, more fun competition there are better options for the money.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
He wanted more bang from the Air Zoom unit: for a 'tempo trainer' it leans hard into daily-trainer territory and feels a little overbuilt for its job. But at $165, while rivals creep past $200, the price alone bumps it back up to a solid A.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
ZoomX gives a soft heel landing, the roomier forefoot helps runners who've found Nikes too narrow, and the exposed Air unit makes toe-off snappy. It's a smidge heavy for a performance trainer, and some runners will want a softer forefoot.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
For big fans of the line it's the best version right now, worth the premium over v42, and a good cushioned 10 mm option that's more fun than rivals like the Ghost 18. If you shop around, though, better options exist, such as the Novablast 6, whether you want a speedy all-rounder or a cushioned daily trainer.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The update doesn't improve the experience: heavy and sluggish even for easy runs, though it protects the legs well and looks good, maybe for the odd 5K or lifestyle wear. For a cushioned shoe for extensive use there are better options, and within Nike's range he much prefers the Vomero 17.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
More comfortable than v3, with a softer, stretchy Flyknit upper, good lockdown, better durability and stability. But it gained an ounce and feels heavy, and the ReactX lacks energy return. Average with no major flaws, at $160 he can't recommend it over rivals like the MaxRoad 6.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Alice Barraclough · 2 days ago
Comfy, cushioned and great-looking for cruising easy miles, and Infinity fans will appreciate the updates. But at £155, an everyday shoe that isn't lightweight or snappy is hard to justify, and they wouldn't reach for it as a plush trainer. It runs snug, so go half a size up.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers & Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A stable neutral daily trainer with a soft Flyknit upper and a firm, rockered ride that v3 fans will like. It gives little softness despite the high stack, and a heavy, high-drop plodder best for easy miles. Size down half, as the sock-like Flyknit holds poorly on turns and faster efforts.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
Extremely stable on a very wide base, with a very comfortable roomy upper, a huge toe box and durable rubber that should last hundreds of miles. But it's heavy and too one-dimensional for anything but easy days, paling next to NB's own 1080. Fine if you want a comfy, soft, stable and slow ride.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Andy · 2 days ago
A one-trick pony that does its trick very well: extremely comfortable and stable for recovery runs of any distance, very quiet with no slapping, and little wear beyond slight midsole creasing after ~70 km. The second tester found the toe box a bit low and the foam more rigid than v5's. Not a frugal buy.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger & Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
Exactly what one tester expected: a plush max-cushion ride tailor-made for recovery days, like a Bondi with a touch more squish. After a 15-miler left her with sore calves and aggravated feet, lacing up v6 made her feel like a new person: soft enough to cradle, with enough bounce not to feel mushy.
Blog · Runner's World – Cat Bowen · 2 days ago
Not flashy and doesn't try to be: comfortable, supportive without being restrictive, cushioned without feeling mushy, and dependable across many uses. It's an easy recommendation for newer runners or anyone wanting a no-fuss shoe for everyday miles. It runs a touch warm, which is a bonus as the weather cools.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A neutral workhorse for all your daily runs and excellent value, with upside for faster paces thanks to its full-length Wave Plate and softer Enerzy NXT. That softer foam may push some traditional fans of the line away.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Nils Scharff · 2 days ago
A noticeable weight cut versus the 27, better roll-off from the revised outsole, a very comfortable soft knit upper and excellent protective cushioning for long runs, with a rebalanced heel and a durable, grippy outsole. The midsole is still not dynamic, and a foam update is overdue for tempo work.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
Plush step-in and a smooth, forgiving, compressive ride that puts comfort over responsiveness: a dependable max-cushion trainer and reliable supporting actor, says one tester, though she'd buy v27 on sale for $125. The melatonin of running shoes: it needs a personality, not another tweak.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A premium, highly stable neutral daily trainer that's light for its 40 mm+ stack, with a snappy forefoot and cushioned, protective ride. It feels far firmer and stiffer than the prior version with more aggressive geometry, there's less outsole rubber, and the thin tongue gives lace bite.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Michael Mason-D'Croz · 2 days ago
Probably the best version yet: almost an ounce lighter, with high stack, a soft, luxurious upper and a ride similar to the last three versions. The FF Blast+ midsole feels outdated and lacks energy return for the price, the ride is firmer than most max-cushion trainers, and the toe box is narrow.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
He's disappointed: despite the new FF Blast Max midsole the ride is flat, way too firm and dull with little energy return. On the plus side it has a respectable weight, high ground feel, good lockdown and stability, and the outsole is more durable than expected, but grip is below average and the toe box narrow.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Markus Zinkl, Ingrid Zasa, Maren Müller & Eva Wiehe · 2 days ago
Very comfortable, with soft FF Blast Max and PureGEL cushioning, a breathable mesh and a surprisingly spacious toe box. One tester praises the durable, grippy, stone-free outsole. Another tester found it less cushioned than expected with a thin upper, one tester felt the midfoot sloppy, and there's little pop.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Denny Krahe · 2 days ago
He's really enjoyed running in it and plans many more miles: comfortable, amply cushioned, durable and smooth, a shoe for high-volume road runners who want one pair to take the daily pounding. His only quibbles are personal (he prefers zero drop and a bit more toe-box room).
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
A genuinely enjoyable, soft daily trainer and her ideal post-Boston recovery companion, and another tester loves the Invincible-like plush foam. Verdict: cushioning yes, performance not quite. A third tester found it noticeably wide, clipping his ankle, and it's $200 against the Superblast 3 and Hyperboost Edge.
Blog · Runner's World – Cat Bowen · 2 days ago
Built for easy miles: a smooth, stable, cushioned ride where the foam and segmented geometry give stability without a plate or post. It's breathable and light-feeling with no hot spots, and the ride won over a tester put off by its retro look. It isn't a fast super trainer, and the collar could be more plush.
Blog · Alastair Running – Alastair Dixon · 2 days ago
Shines on easy and recovery runs: a soft, protective landing, a smooth guided transition that feels more like 8 mm drop, and outstanding X10 grip wet and dry with basically zero wear. The midsole lacks liveliness, with no pop at tempo, and the thick upper and plush tongue run warm.
Blog · WearTesters – Arune & Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
An excellent, smooth and fun daily trainer, ideal for beginners or comeback runners, with a firm-ish yet protective midsole. The X10 outsole looked great after 100 mi, and grip was reliable in all conditions. It's wide-foot friendly with a 2E option. The upper could breathe better,; feet swelled on hot runs.
Blog · Runner's World – Cat Bowen · 2 days ago
A capable, exciting race or everyday shoe: the glass-fibre Wave Plate gives genuine spring-forward propulsion without running you, lockdown is legitimately impressive, and it's stable side-to-side for a super shoe. Her main note is fit: it's snug through the midfoot and toe box, so wider feet will feel it.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann, Meaghan Murray & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
It rides slightly softer and bouncier than v2 while keeping its smooth roll-through and fun factor, and the fit is better for those the v2 felt too long on. One tester enjoyed every run but sees too little improvement to justify it over a discounted v2, and wide feet should look elsewhere.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A major midsole improvement: no longer mushy, with dual Enerzy NXT and a glass-fibre plate making it bouncy, protective and solid for uptempo long runs, threshold and tempo. Rocks jam in the big outsole groove on gravel. The heel padding pressed on his Achilles so badly he couldn't take another step after 35 mi.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Ben David & Derek Li · 2 days ago
A broad platform, ample toe box and breathable upper on a durable, traditional-riding trainer. Grip is decent wet and dry, a little less sure on damp roads. It's heavy and the ride bland, and the slightly low volume may not suit high-volume feet or very warm conditions.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
An easy-going, stable neutral shoe for walking and easy running, good for orthotic users and lower arches. The rocker rolls you along with a smooth heel transition, and it's highly durable. The midsole isn't responsive, it feels heavy for the first 10–15 mi, and it's limited to easy paces.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray & Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
A solid, reliable daily trainer for easy and recovery days: not exciting, but little to complain about, and a comfortable, durable, reasonably priced entry-level pick. It threads the needle between v1 and v2 with a much better look, though the ride felt firmer if more responsive.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Comfortable and predictable, with good protection for long, easy runs, but there are better options. It's stiff, so feet pulled against the midsole in the high-volume upper. It isn't very supportive despite the wide base, and the upper was hot in summer. Rivals offer similar cushioning lighter and more versatile.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
Plusher than the previous model, with a wider base and moderate cushioning for all-day comfort, a soft breathable upper that holds the foot, and durability for many miles. Not versatile, so not one for faster paces, and it's on the heavy side.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Rated A: the rocker is stronger than v1's (partly thanks to a new EVA insole), it's more responsive and ~20 g lighter, and it feels like a jog-friendly Magic Speed 4 with real forefoot propulsion. Good for tempo running and as a gentle first plated shoe. The price rose ¥2,200.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Beth Long · 2 days ago
Comfortable, stable, lightweight cushioning, a roomy toe box and good toe-off let her focus on form rather than her feet. Good looking too. But the tall heel tab rubbed her raw and caused small blisters on double-digit runs, so for her it's best under 10 miles. Not responsive enough for speed or racing.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas & Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A maximal, rockered daily trainer with a great cushion-to-weight ratio, surprising versatility and stability from a slightly firm, wide base. Best as a steady cruiser with some uptempo ability. The heel is too snug at the back and can rub, and the toe box is tapered and low.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
A huge step up from this shoe Edge as a daily trainer: forgiving, responsive, wide and stable, slightly firmer than the Edge but never mushy. It comfortably covers six miles and picks up the pace without complaint, which adidas has struggled to nail outside the Evo SL.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
At long last, a fun, modern all-round adidas daily trainer: an energetic, fast and stable ride, and less stack than the Edge adds lively snappiness and versatility at any pace. The plasticky upper adds weight the underfoot materials shouldn't need, and it's priced at the upper end of its class.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger & Karl Fernandez · 2 days ago
One tester likes it after break-in. A stand-out look and a slightly firmer Hyperboost Pro ride than the Edge that softens and opens up after about ten miles. Another tester finds it lacks the Edge's magic and isn't an uptempo daily trainer, telling most people to spend $30 more on the Edge. At $170 it's a steep ask.
Blog · El del Pelotón de Atrás – Roberto · 2 days ago
It can technically do easy runs, tempo and reps, but not equally well. At slow paces the midsole is firm and flat and he wanted them off after 14 km. At fast paces the rocker works, energy return appears and the transition is fantastic. Wear after 100 km was practically nil.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
An upgrade over the Kinvara Pro, with a softer, more energetic ride, a flexible plate that makes it more engaging, a comfier stretchy upper and a better outsole. Deeply cushioned, perfect for long runs and able to pick up the pace. It's less stable and heavier than the Kinvara Pro.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The thick, dense PWRRUN layer deadens the IncrediRun foam, so it's neither bouncy nor soft, and he didn't enjoy running fast in it. It's heavy, the transition isn't smooth and it's loud. Cushioned enough for daily miles, but cheaper trainers like the Novablast 5 are better, so he wouldn't recommend it.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
A stable-neutral performance trainer with a responsive ride and great pace versatility, enjoyable for easy miles thanks to balanced compliance and resilience. The heel is clunky, the weight noticeable, durability slightly below average with early wear on exposed foam, and it needs half a size up.
Blog · Run & Smile – Roman Brcar · 2 days ago
Best at marathon and half-marathon pace, where the rocker and 3/4 carbon plate come alive. It also worked well for intervals. At slow paces the firm bottom foam feels too stiff, and the upper ran warm. After 100 km there was no visible wear, and he'll use it for marathon-pace long runs.
Blog · Personal Running Coach – Roberto Martini · 2 days ago
An honest shoe: comfortable, reliable and durable, the one you'll reach for most. Breathable upper, great comfort on long runs and a tough outsole, with no visible wear after ~100 km. It isn't for those seeking responsiveness or lightness, and the foam can feel firmer than other Fresh Foam.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
The thicker, softer midsole pushes it into cushy territory once held by the 1080, and the $140 price will win many runners. Well cushioned without being too soft. It's heavier than before and may feel too thick and stiff for some, so runners wanting responsiveness should look elsewhere.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A maximal daily trainer with a well-cushioned, balanced ride and stable neutral feel, for easy running and walking. The lateral side broke in after 15–20 mi and the foam has stayed consistent. The midsole is slightly firm and it's best for easy efforts only. The upper isn't sockless-friendly.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Fixes the original's main limits: much lighter, a more breathable upper and a new sense of stability and protection. It sits between daily trainers and racers, clearly favouring comfort over pure reactivity, which makes it one of the most versatile options.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
Testers reached for it day after day for easy miles, long runs and recovery: stable, comfortable and a true workhorse, if not the plushest. Its looks are much improved. At $225 it isn't the pick for faster miles, but it's fair value for a long-lasting easy/long-run shoe.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner – The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
Less stack, less weight and an updated carbon plate lift it to new heights: more versatile and more stable, with solid energy return. Proof that less shoe can be more. He rates it better value than the $230 Vomero Premium. It's pricey, and the upper is dense.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Ali Ball · 2 days ago
Comfortable fit, decent cushioning and impressive traction make it a reliable shoe for steady miles, walks or the gym. But it's a vanilla option with no standout quality. It irritated the insides of her feet near the big toes on a 22 km run, so it's best kept to runs of about 16 km.
Blog · T3 – Matt Kollat · 2 days ago
Not one for PBs, but a bouncy, comfortable trainer for casual runs and walks, with 9 mm more Light Boost than this shoe Light. The area over the toes felt a little less roomy than the previous model. A solid choice if you want a stylish, comfy running shoe.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Kieran Alger · 2 days ago
Perfectly competent but largely unremarkable: comfortable, easy to run in and nicely balanced, with nothing glaringly wrong. The upper ran thick and hot on longer summer runs, and the Boost midsole lacks the punch of livelier trainers.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Comfortable, good-looking and lighter than older Ultraboosts, and fine for general wear and easy runs up to 8–10 miles. As a running shoe it's outclassed: the Supernova Prima, Pegasus 41 and others are more versatile and comfortable for less money.
Blog · The Running Club – Dario Marchini · 2 days ago
Scores 6.4. Infinion makes it lighter, more elastic and more reactive, so it is more versatile than past 1080s. But after 150 km the outsole already shows the first signs of wear.
Blog · High-Instep Wide-Foot Shoe Lab – 羽場 広 · 2 days ago
At 150 km there's almost no loss of cushioning and durability looks excellent. The toe mesh lets water in after ~4 km in rain, and with thick socks his feet got heavy from 10 km. It drains well, though.
Blog · tomo.run · 2 days ago
Soft cushioning that stays healthy, with the midsole in good shape. The ankle and heel fit is the one weak point: the ankle padding is thin and the heel cup feels loose and unsupportive compared to v13/v14.
Blog · Shuichi Running – Shuichi Hibino · 2 days ago
Possibly 2026's best-buy jog shoe. Grip is superb, barely slipping on wet asphalt (a surprise for NB). Durability is high: at 520 km the midsole shape and cushioning held and the rubber was only lightly worn.
Blog · Sapporo Track Bike Diary – HOSH · 2 days ago
Cushioning and rebound in balance, stable without being too soft. Infinion makes it bouncy. Grip is good even on rainy training days. His go-to for jogs and long runs, with the Rebel v5 for workouts. The price is the only concern.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
Rated 97% and back on their best-cushioned list. The new foam and lighter weight incrementally improve a daily trainer that works for many runners. The upper is a little stiff, and a fuller rubber outsole would help durability.
Blog · Good Housekeeping – Heath Owens · 2 days ago
A comfy everyday trainer can be your race-day shoe: one pair carried the tester through a full training cycle and the L.A. Marathon. It is more responsive than past versions and holding up well. The soft, high foam isn't for overpronators or supinators.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Scores 8.5: 'a winning shoe doesn't change'. The new collar fixes the X2's heel abrasion. After 160 km there's no abnormal wear, and lighter runners could see 800 km. Good value (7.5).
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
A leg-friendly, moderately propulsive and fairly stable trainer with an improved fit and a ¥5,500 price cut. As a super trainer it is underwhelming and could be lighter.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb, Annie Keris · 2 days ago
A lively, bouncy midsole that handles double-digit long runs with pace work. One tester loved it at every pace from 5K to marathon. The outsole and upper are durable and the upper is breathable. The tongue is floppy and almost unattached, and the fit is narrow-ish.
Blog · Active Gear Review – Niels Oomkes · 2 days ago
A sweet speed trainer and racer for an older runner building speed carefully. The ankle cuff, tongue and upper wrap the foot securely, and the Pebax plate gives a stronger push-off. He is watching outside-heel wear.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great shoe that fixes the only real problem with v2: the improved upper makes easy runs more comfortable and it is even more versatile. It still performs at speed despite gaining weight (9.7 oz vs 9 oz in his size).
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 6.9 (vs. 6.6 for v11). Not the revolution the name suggests or the super trainer they hoped for, but more convincing in outsole, upper and early durability. The €170 price is barely above the standard version.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Better named 'Bondi Plus': this shoe with added bounce, max-cushion height and a smooth rocker, covering recovery through tempo. It isn't the racing shoe the name suggests and is heavier than v11.
Blog · tomo.run · 2 days ago
Innovative, but half-baked as a shoe. The midsole sinks deeper than expected on landing, so foot wobble comes straight through, and this shoe's trademark stability is missing. He'd just buy v11, or a discounted v10.
Blog · Negibozu · 2 days ago
Completely different from v11. The forefoot rebound and propulsion shine on road climbs and mountain-pass sections. After 100 km the cushioning still feels firmish rather than the usual plush, and ~300 g is noticeable when pushing the pace.
Blog · ichiuma · 2 days ago
A tempo-up ride with more rebound: the fit is 5/5, the bounce is good, and it is great for pace runs and speed jogs. Stability is weaker than v11 (3/5), and at 277 g (27.0 cm) it isn't light.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann, Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
Another tester: everything people love about this shoe, dialled up just enough to feel fresh. It is comfortable, versatile and fairly priced at $165. One tester expected more 'Pro' pep and feels it should just have been v11.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers, Nathan Brown (DPTs) · 2 days ago
A neutral daily trainer for easy miles. PROGLIDE+ supercritical EVA gives light compliance and responsiveness, though the stiff platform, moderate weight and muted rocker keep it in easy-run territory. It is a great addition to the line. They suggest opening up the restrictive midfoot overlays.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A cushioned daily trainer that is protective, comfortable and fun, and one of the strongest options in the category. A good all-rounder alongside a faster workout shoe. There is no need to own both it and v11.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 7. It doesn't overhaul a proven design but fixes what it needed: an FF Turbo Squared insert for a brighter ride, a better upper, and improved heel containment.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
Overwhelmingly good value. The cushioning sinks deep but has little rebound, and the forefoot feels stable. When picking up the pace the response is poor and toe-off timing goes off.
Blog · RuncerLAB – AZ · 2 days ago
A practical daily trainer for E-pace (4:50–5:15/km) that doesn't run away from you: more propulsion and stability than NB5, light (232 g measured), and no wear at 171 km. The NB5's trampoline fun is clearly gone, so NB5 fans may be disappointed.
Blog · Kosodate Run – hashiru · 2 days ago
His favourite feature is the fit: a racing-like hold even in the wide model, which doesn't look bulky. There was some midfoot tightness after the first 30 km, with no later effect. He calls it the one shoe that is enough, however many you own.
Blog · Negibozu · 2 days ago
Rated 4/5 by a sub-3 runner. The forefoot cushioning is much improved, it feels lighter, and it can handle tempo running. After 100 km and a full marathon, the forefoot cushion and lively feel are largely intact.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
An outstanding daily trainer he'll recommend to everyone. He likes it more than the Pegasus 42 and Ghost 18, which are less cushioned, heavier and duller. New ASICSGRIP fixes past wet-grip weakness.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sally, Sam, Stephen · 2 days ago
'Passe partout': a highly cushioned, peppy daily trainer, and ASICSGRIP now grips well wet or dry without trapping stones. The plush collars and woven upper likely add weight. One tester's soft-forefoot neuroma flared.
Blog · Runnea UK – Julen Palazuelo · 2 days ago
After 350 km it keeps its personality: comfortable, dynamic and versatile, with plenty of pop left though the foam has settled. The upper held up better than expected. Grip is good, but the outsole and exposed foam show clear wear.
Blog · ippo.run – Shotaro Nimura · 2 days ago
Rated 4.0/5. The best fatigue-flush jog shoe: tough cushioning and a stable landing protected his legs the day after hard workouts. At 400–500 km the midsole and outsole showed little wear. It is heavy for adidas (~283 g) and too muted for faster running.
Blog · boopolo · 2 days ago
An older runner ('at my age') avoiding plated shoes. Across 542 km and three marathons he had zero ankle issues. It isn't as fast as the Boston 12 or Adios Pro 3. He shows the wear on the shoes in a video.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Melissa Guillen, Renee Krusemark · 2 days ago
A versatile road-to-trail hybrid that excels in wet and mixed conditions, with a fun, responsive ride. It is flexible and easy to control on gravel and doubletrack, but not for switchback-heavy singletrack. The tongue bunched after about 60 mi.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam, Jen, Adam, Courtney · 2 days ago
Springy Lightstrike Pro foam with more grip and seasons. It is comfortable at any pace and doesn't prescribe a gait. It has gained weight over this shoe, and the upper is dense and warm.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
His go-to winter running shoe. If you love the standard version SL and want a version for winter, it lives up to its billing: a fun, versatile daily trainer with more peace of mind on wet, mixed surfaces.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
Through 80 miles, including seven double-digit marathon-training runs up to 14 mi, it is his favourite HOKA yet (he has run the Clifton 9, Skyward X and Speedgoat 6). It is plush and max-cushioned, but the 40 mm heel never feels that tall, and the ride flows smoothly.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great cushioned daily trainer for a wide range of runners. It doesn't wow you at first but wins you over with regular use. He finds it more versatile and enjoyable than the Clifton 9. The upper is warm-ish but secure and rub-free.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
Rated 93%. A rare first model that hits it out of the park: a blend of the Clifton and Bondi, so one shoe covers daily and recovery runs. After 300 mi they expect a 400–500-mile lifespan.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 6.4. A clear step forward from v2 for neutral midfoot or forefoot strikers. It is ideal for structured marathon long runs and quality work, and less suited to slow runs or heel strikers.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
'Divided minds': the ride is more firm than plush, and her feet got sore on runs over 6 mi. It really shines when you pick up the pace, and the high stack stays stable. It is heavy, the upper is stiff and the fit is snug.
Blog · WeeViews – Scott Hilton · 2 days ago
A big fan of the original (nearly 500 mi), he found this version clunky, rigid and hard on his harsh mechanics. He expects only average wear for $200 and plans to sell the pair.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Disappointed and confused. It is now quite heavy, doesn't feel great for faster runs, and lacks the pace of top plated trainers like the Endorphin Speed 5 and Mach X2. The bounce is muted, though the shoe is stable for such a high stack.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
A solid, fun, all-round shoe: bounce plus stability, a comfortable sock-like upper that suits wide feet, and long-term durability. It is less plush than the best trainers, and breathability is limited.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger · 2 days ago
'A pleasant surprise': he kept reaching for it on 5–7-mile runs, and it is fun and comfortable. At $180, though, he would pick other trainers.
Blog · PR Nerd – Phil Parker · 2 days ago
'A real daily trainer, not just a comeback story.' Boost gives cushioned stability rather than bounce, and the Continental outsole is proving durable after 130 mi at 200 lb. He bought it on sale; the price is hard to beat. The cheap laces are his biggest complaint, and the upper stretched.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb, Arune Singh · 2 days ago
A comfortable, stable max-cushion trainer that suits heavier runners too. The improved outsole should last 300–500 miles.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Plush and protective for easy miles. It runs short: about 10 miles into a hilly run, feet slid forward and caused a toe hotspot. Consider sizing up.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Silke, Maxime Gourmelen · 2 days ago
'Massive!' the softest shoe she has ever run in. It is great up to about 15 km, but beyond that the weight and bulk made runs feel laborious.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 2 days ago
Rated B+/A-. A huge, stable, comfortable max-cushion cruiser for easy miles. The forefoot is low-volume, and it felt laborious and heavy on his 16-mile long run.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Ali Ball · 2 days ago
A fun, bouncy ride with premium cushioning, and the rocker aids transitions. It's an update on the v13, which some found too soft and unstable. The v14's shallower toe box may be why her toe bruised. Pricey for a beginner.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
96%. A shoe you'll grab over and over: max cushioned without feeling overly plush, so you don't sink in over many miles. Still great at 200+ miles. Versatile for running or walking, but for easy and recovery runs, not speed. Thicker mesh may run warm.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Does its job of protecting the legs and is comfortable on easy runs and walks, and a big upgrade on v8. But it feels too limited for him: heavy, without much bounce, softness or energy return, and not versatile even among max-cushion shoes.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 2 days ago
A premium neutral max trainer with plush but structured cushioning. The new heel frame makes a very wide, stable, secure landing, and the rocker still rolls you forward. Still heavy, and the heel may be too structured for some (a bit much for one tester's mechanics).
Blog · Switchback Travel – Rebecca Parsons · 2 days ago
Some of the highest cushion she's tested, for supreme comfort. A balance of plush comfort and practical performance for runners who put protection over pace. Though neutral, the wide heel and midfoot make it surprisingly stable.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Final score 8. Always Hoka's maxi model for slow and recovery runs, and v9 is much improved. Value score 7.5: at €180 it's €20 cheaper than its direct rivals, the Glycerin Max and its peers.
Blog · Podisti.net – Maurizio Lorenzini · 2 days ago
'A shoe for many feet': high comfort, and it adapted to his feet immediately. A max-cushion, stable shoe that should reach 500-600 km. He cautions that the midsole may lose much of its cushioning before the outsole looks worn.
Blog · Marius Bercea · 2 days ago
Plush, protective and trustworthy, and he never found it heavy (unlike the Bondi X). Feet stayed warm at 1°C and the mesh breathed as it warmed. No major wear at 100 km. For ultrarunners, long endurance and recovery runs; not for speedwork.
Blog · WeeViews – Evan Jensen · 2 days ago
A long-haul max-cushion workhorse: protective and comfortable for very long days, including a 51-mile ultra. It held up well across ~250 miles.
Blog · Nao-Nao's Ameblo · 2 days ago
Effectively a Novablast 3 except for the upper, and cheaper. Happy just to be able to buy a Nova 3 again. She preferred the thinner Nova 3 tongue. Neither v5 nor the Novablast 5 is 'better'; it comes down to feel and use.
Blog · Run Hike – Toufu · 2 days ago
'A hall-of-fame shoe, thank you for bringing it back.' The sink-then-bounce midsole is well executed, it's inexpensive and he'd recommend it to everyone. Breathability is mediocre: the thick upper traps heat, so pair it with thin socks.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Essentially a Novablast 3 rerelease at a very low price: bouncy, quick-responding and high-spec for its price bracket, with a thicker OrthoLite insole. About 10 g heavier than the Nova 3 because of the new upper, though not enough to bother him.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A comfortable, naturally stable daily trainer, especially for new runners. It feels like a slightly different v9 rather than an upgrade, the foam isn't lively and there's little toe-off spring. He thinks the Skyflow is worth the extra $10.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 2 days ago
B+/A- overall. One tester: a true trainer whose firm rockered ride is done well and eats up big miles, with great heel stability and a secure upper. The volume is a bit low (could be wider in the forefoot), and the price keeps climbing.
Blog · Runstreet – Marnie Kunz · 2 days ago
One of her favorite shoes for daily miles and long runs. The extra cushioning makes concrete miles comfortable, and it's versatile for easy, recovery, long and light-trail runs and races. Can feel bulky, and not the best for speed workouts.
Blog · iRunFar – Nathan Allen · 2 days ago
One of the best everyday shoes available, so don't be put off by the high stack. Technically max cushion, but it doesn't behave like one: far less clunky and more efficient and responsive than the Bondi or Skyward X.
Blog · Shuichi Running – Shuichi Hibino · 2 days ago
Explains why he chose it and covers comfort, propulsion and sizing in detail: a just-right fit at 27.5 cm (slightly larger than other brands' 27.5), with a comfortable, cushioned ride as a daily jogging shoe.
Blog · Kumazou's Running Bar · 2 days ago
Cushioning is still excellent and it is light for a thick-soled shoe, so long runs leave less fatigue. The higher offset adds slightly more propulsion than v9, but the effect is small. A good shoe for beginners and long easy runs.
Blog · Genkaran blog · 2 days ago
Long-term durability report: after ~900 km, including hard summer ultra training, it is still usable. Recommended for marathon-plus distances, 5:00/km-and-slower paces and jogging. True to size; choose the wide version for broad feet, or size up with an aftermarket insole.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 2 days ago
One tester gave it a C-. B+ overall. Another tester (B): with a slightly more flexible forefoot and more heel rounding it could reach the A range. One tester (C-) found the midfoot and forefoot design didn't work with her mechanics, making transitions extra work.
Blog · Running Culture – Jan Lau · 2 days ago
A successful update: more flexible and a bit more dynamic in the forefoot, with an airier upper, so it runs freer. PumaGrip is strong on changing surfaces and in the wet. The fit is less compact (size down for narrow feet), it lacks a final kick below ~4:00/km, and the upper gives less guidance.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Ali Ball, Rachel · 2 days ago
A fantastic upgrade on the v3 (whose propulsion disappointed one tester) and now in line with the Speed 5, Mach X 3 and Hyperion Max 3. Works for easy, long and speedier sessions, and could be a race shoe for ~4-hour marathoners. It feels different from v3 but remains enjoyable.
Blog · Canadian Running – Marley Dickinson · 2 days ago
A versatile, reliable cushioned super trainer that handles most training without compromise and has no glaring weaknesses. No blisters, hot spots or comfort issues. The arch rubbing he had in previous versions is gone.
Blog · Run Bulldog Run – Steve · 2 days ago
The dual-layer Nitrofoam gives a wonderfully lively ride with impressive energy return from the start. The upper holds the foot securely and is wearing well, and the construction is sensible and uncomplicated. Still enjoying the fit and feel after 200 miles, with the shoes holding up nicely.
Blog · Thich Chay Bo – Hieu · 2 days ago
9.5/10, a 'must-buy' 187 g PEBA super trainer: responsive, smooth and rhythmic, and firmer than the TG 2.0, so his calves no longer fatigue past 20 km. A 'long-run monster'. Very narrow midfoot: the sidewalls pressed into his arches, and there's no runner's-knot eyelet.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Overwhelming cushion and a fun bounce, best between marathon pace and half pace, where running felt light and easy. A bit heavy (265 g) for fast running, and the upper is stiff and roomy. Good for long runs, LT runs, jogs and sub-3 to sub-4 marathons.
Blog · Run Lab – Rukku · 2 days ago
41/50. A well-balanced trainer: soft, bouncy upper foam, an excellent knit fit and good grip. But the deliberately firm lower layer makes it less fun to run in, and it lacks a standout trait. He prefers the softer SC Trainer v3.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 2 days ago
One tester gave it a C. Another tester (A-) really enjoyed it for easy runs and tired-leg days. One tester (C) found the heel far too soft: the forefoot guidance is great, but it can't offset the mushy heel. Within 100 miles the midsole settled down and compressed.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
The softest, bounciest and most fun super trainer he's tested, and his legs recovered well after 40 km. Very little wear at 130 km. Its big weakness is instability: he slows for corners and uneven ground, and the upper feels sloppy. $20 more than v1.
Blog · Run, Fit & Fun – Frédéric Brossard · 2 days ago
Rare durability: at 800 km the outsole looks the same as at 400 km and still grips in the wet, and the cushioning and forefoot propulsion are intact, with no holes in the mesh. The upper loosened (a wash fixed it). From ~700 km the heel started sagging inward, which is sometimes bothersome.
Blog · The Running Club – Dario Marchini · 2 days ago
Score 7-. One of 2024's breakout daily trainers: very fun and cheerful, it adapts to recovery jogs, free-flowing runs, fartleks and reps like a Rebel v4. Light for its size. The heel area already showed clear wear after 150 km.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb, Annie Keris · 2 days ago
Another tester would only recommend it to shoe nerds: promising tech (knit tongue, foam outsole, rocker, PEBA blend) that doesn't come together. One tester liked its bouncy protection on long moderate runs, but faster efforts bottomed out the soft forefoot. The foam outsole may reach ~300 mi.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A bouncy, versatile daily trainer that is terrific fun, from very easy runs to 1K reps. It made a dawn hilly 10-miler easy to face. The exposed foam outsole showed no undue wear after 50 miles, but avoid gravel. The high price and strong rivals are the catch.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
Co-testers had foot and knee pain (C and C-). B+ from one tester: a bouncy, highly rockered PEBA/EVA trainer for easy, long and recovery runs. The big heel bevel worked for him, but it isn't the most stable and the foam doesn't respond fast enough for quick efforts. Outsole should last slightly above average.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 3 days ago
A-: one of his favorite daily trainers this year. He wishes the heel had a touch more rounding.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger · 3 days ago
Brooks is quietly putting out impressive shoes, and v22 'has it all' for a premium daily trainer.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb, Annie Keris · 3 days ago
A favorite traditional Brooks daily trainer again: reliable, accommodating and plush, and the forefoot bounce outweighs slightly lower outsole durability (400+ mi unlikely). One tester wishes for a lower drop.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 3 days ago
A longtime fan of the line says the new DNA Tuned foam starts a new era for a solid but never-exciting shoe. It has a modern, much better-looking design and an upper more comfortable than the Max's.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
As dependably good as you'd expect, a comfortable daily trainer, but not a big upgrade on the 21 and still a bit short on speed. Grab a discounted v21 if you see one.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+ overall (personal B/B+): a comfortable ride for running and walking, but a little too soft for him to use extensively.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
A big fan of the line who 'just didn't' love it: not enough value or fun factor at $170, and it has lost some of the allure. A long-run shoe for narrow feet that he wishes were more versatile.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray, Ryan Haines · 3 days ago
'A big fan', it could have been the next Nimbus. Softer and more comfortable than the Deviate Nitro 3, a great pick for long, easy miles; the Puma suits quicker paces.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+/A- (personal A-): it works well for his mechanics, and he enjoys logging easy miles in it. A little slapping, but manageable.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
A really nice surprise: comfortable and responsive for daily training, recovery and long runs. Nitro foam and PumaGrip promise plenty of mileage; no wear after 50 miles.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nothing novel, yet an excellent max-cushioned shoe, comfortable for easy and long runs, with a great outsole. More versatile and a bit cheaper than most rivals. Not the best for faster runs.
Blog · Runner’s World · 3 days ago
Testers say Puma 'got the foam right'. One wanted to put them on every time she left the house: a perfect fit with a cupped, stable heel on hard turns. The toe box runs long, leaving toes 'on the loose'.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
A-: a great walking shoe and the rare premium trainer he can pick up the pace in. He wishes the forefoot were a bit more comfortable.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
'Same, but the same' (one tester 6/15): every rival is 'better and cheaper'. It isn't an update worth getting excited about, so buy v25 or v26 on sale. A third tester: too close to the Kayano and blocky; reliable but won't make runs exciting.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
7.5/10: a well-cushioned, super comfortable shoe that can absorb hundreds of easy miles, a luxurious choice for recovery runs and jogs. Not for speed days.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
One of the best max-cushioned cruisers, alongside the Hurricane 24: a balanced, reliable option you won't be disappointed in, though it's not likely to wow you.
Blog · Supwell – Meredith Johnston · 3 days ago
Ultra-comfortable, plush max-cushion daily trainer with surprising pace versatility after 200 miles; outsole and foam holding up well.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 3 days ago
A- overall. He usually prefers firmer shoes but 'still really liked it'.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann, Caryn Just · 3 days ago
One tester: a fantastic update that makes easy and recovery runs more enjoyable, and highly recommended. Another tester finds it fun but strictly neutral, best for pure recovery days of 4-5 miles; stability seekers should beware.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers (DPT) · 3 days ago
B overall: she likes the midsole feel, but the laterally biased midfoot was 'a dealbreaker' and the discomfort kept her runs to 4 miles or less. Almost no outsole wear at 25 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann · 3 days ago
Preferred over the 'squirrelly' v1: a tamer shoe for the masses with a much-improved upper, a fantastic fit and a ride that is still exciting and fun. v1 fans may see it as a step back, and the price went up from $150.
Blog · Runner’s World – Cat Bowen · 3 days ago
More stable and less wild than v1: built for base mileage, long runs and recovery days with some life underfoot. It runs slightly long, and wide feet will feel crowded in the midfoot and toe box. The Evo SL and Ride 19 are better for pace.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Not a shoe he'd buy himself: better options cost the same or less, like the Magnify Nitro 3 or Velocity Nitro 4, and the Vomero Plus and Kipride Max have springier rides.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann, Meaghan Murray, Karl Fernandez · 3 days ago
A few minor but significant improvements 'really make this cat purr'. Puma has been hitting it out of the park, and fans of v1 will most likely enjoy v2.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers (DPT) · 3 days ago
A- overall (personal A): one of her favorite max trainers of 2026, nearly 1 oz lighter than v1 and bouncy, a stable neutral for easy and uptempo miles. Good wet traction. The midfoot is noticeably narrower than v1.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
A poofy, soft, bouncy 'marshmallow' focused on maximum cushion above everything else. Anyone who thinks 'the softer, the better' should buy it: the Hoka ethos taken to the extreme.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+ to A-: a great super trainer for easy days and big cushion with some bounce, mostly limited to easier and longer efforts. One tester saw a decent amount of outsole wear by 35 mi and expects only average durability.
Blog · Men’s Fitness – Mike Sawh · 3 days ago
A hulking but comfortable shoe that shines at easy-to-moderate paces, smooth and stable, with a surprisingly snappy feel and an accommodating fit. Minimal outsole wear after 50+ miles. Not for all-out speed, heavier than rivals and not cheap.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jessica Downey, Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Exceptional cushioning, stability and smooth transitions for long easy runs and recovery days. It protects the legs on downhills and makes easy paces feel quick. Heavy and huge, so not for tempo or race day, and pricey.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann · 3 days ago
One tester sees it as Hoka 'coming back swinging', a modern take on the brand's original vision that he could take 'stupid distances' in. Plenty of bounce. They expect the outsole to last well past 300-500 miles.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
8.5/10. It breaks Nike cushioning records, feels incredibly plush and is surprisingly stable for its height. Its limited use cases make the price hard to justify for many; walking and short runs won't reveal its support shortcomings.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
A- overall: perhaps the plushest, bounciest trainer one tester has run in, and impressively stable for its height. Great for easy runs on tired legs. The high weight limits its use, and the high-coverage outsole should justify the $230.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Robbe Reddinger (+ Thomas) · 3 days ago
One tester found it too heavy. The plushest in the line, surprisingly steady for 55 mm, and another tester gave it 12/15. A third tester dissents: one of the heaviest road shoes they've reviewed, easy runs felt hard, and it's a 'trend that went too far'.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum, Michael Ellenberger, Sally Reiley, Allison Valliere · 3 days ago
Scores of 9.3 to 9.55: radical yet practical, energetic and fun, never ponderous or mushy. One tester went from skeptic to LOVE. Heavy at ~327 g, a bit wobbly at faster paces, and it sliced another tester's heel.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jane McGuire, Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Seriously fun and bouncy; one tester doesn't want to wear anything else, and another tester says it delivers the last word in comfort for easy runs. Overpronators or budget buyers should pick the more stable Vomero Plus.
Blog · Supwell · 3 days ago
'Absolute tanks' after 384 miles: the foam and Air Zoom units feel as responsive as day one, and the outsole is barely touched. Next-level protection and bounce for recovery and high-mileage weeks. One tester likes it best at uptempo/Z2-3 rather than recovery.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Nathan (DPTs) · 3 days ago
Overall B and B-. One tester loves the lively forefoot and excellent fit, but the rugged heel limits it to workouts. For another tester it 'just didn't work' (personal D): slappy with tough transitions. It lacks the versatility of the Endorphin Speed or SC Trainer v3 at $180.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Courtney Kelly, Sally Reiley, Michael Ellenberger · 3 days ago
Scores of 8.88 to 9.33. FF Turbo Squared foam is 'something special', bouncier and livelier than the Endorphin Speed 5, which one tester thinks it may have dethroned. It works best at intervals and uptempo.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
Quickly one of a favorite super trainers: bounce and pop for pace, yet sturdy enough for daily miles. It may steal the Superblast's crown. Another tester: it has the magic he was missing from the Endorphin Speed.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Caryn Just, Sam Sheldon · 3 days ago
'A juicy contradiction'. One tester gives a mediocre review but says it's not a bad shoe and some runners may love it, though $180 is a risk next to the Endorphin Speed. Another tester found it bulky and limited to easy pace. A third tester found it heavy and bland. The exposed midsole wears fast.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Kieran Alger · 3 days ago
A confused shoe: too heavy and chunky to be a plated super trainer. But it's very capable for easy recovery runs, and it was excellent late in a 100-mile ultra when his feet needed protection from the asphalt. He prefers it to the Nimbus 25 there.
Blog · WearTesters – Annie Keris, Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
'A tough sell': not the best at any single use case or as a generalist. It offers plenty of impact protection for long steady efforts, and suits larger runners with average-to-narrow feet. Otherwise 'you're going to have better options'.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
Grades B- to C+. A firm but bouncy, very durable max-stack trainer with a bouncy forefoot, but a clunky heel, tapered toe box and narrow midfoot. Weight and geometry don't match the $210 price. He 'would never normally choose to run in' it; it took ~20 mi to break in.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Alex Filitti, Andy Wright · 3 days ago
Neither tester can find a place for it: too heavy and unstable for speed (a 'sloppy lean' and unsettling list when cornering), and not cushioned enough for sore legs. The exposed Air bag worries them. The price should put it up against the SC Trainer. It looks good with jeans.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
8.5/10. Nike's scooped Zoom Air unit is soft and bouncy but stable enough to trust for lots of miles, with a real fun factor and a great look. Too soft and squishy for all-day wear, but runners will like that.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
It lived up to the hype: fun, energizing and bouncy, 'like cups of coffee on your feet'. One tester uses it for nearly every run that isn't long or speed work. The fit is praiseworthy and the $210 price is in line with rivals.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
A fun shoe, but 'not one I recommend to most runners': the high price, heavy design and instability mean there are better options, like the Superblast 2, Skyward X or Pegasus Plus. Only worth it if you love the look.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B overall: a bouncy, resilient, highly durable super trainer for long and tempo runs. The massive posterior flare and missing heel bevel make his shins ache on every run. Another tester loves the forefoot, but the rigid heel collar dug into his ankle. Better for forefoot strikers.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann · 3 days ago
One tester would put it on a pedestal for its foam, the most dynamic of its super-trainer peers (Superblast 3, Cloudmonster 3 Hyper), and it's cheaper. The Superblast 3 wins on weight and on an upper that suits nearly everyone.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Nils Scharff · 3 days ago
9.15/10, with the ride scored 10. A lively, bouncy max-cushion trainer that gets livelier as the pace picks up, with an exceptionally durable, grippy outsole and good value at €200. The upper is warm and the stiff collar may bother sensitive Achilles.
Blog · Runner’s World · 3 days ago
Incredible rebound and many testers' go-to long-run shoe: 'near-perfect if only the upper was a touch softer'. Her 14-mile run left blisters on several toes because the rough, rigid Primeweave rubbed, and another tester reported hot spots too.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
The springy Hyperboost Pro foam is fun for easy and tempo runs, and the full outsole grips and looks durable. But the uncomfortable upper 'might be a deal-breaker for many'. Not a must-buy; he prefers the Megablast and Superblast 3.
Blog · Supwell · 3 days ago
Still amazing after 100 miles, perhaps better than out of the box: bouncy, protective and snappy foam, and grippy on wet pavement. The outsole looks barely worn. Their favorite super trainer of 2026. Some people report a stiff upper or Achilles rubbing, though the team didn't.
Blog · Men’s Health – Brett Williams · 3 days ago
A surprisingly sturdy, light and reliable workhorse that carried him through a rocky Boston build. After 70 miles it still feels like new out of the box and barely looks worn.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Derek Li · 3 days ago
An incredibly fun shoe and the most stable of the group thanks to flared sidewalls. However, the narrow fit made his outer midfoot ache after longer runs, and the spongy ride feels sluggish at higher efforts. He picks the ANTA Zone2 overall.
Blog · Run Your Story – Dave McDonald · 3 days ago
Premium materials and a highly energetic, fun ride at $150, versatile from daily miles to long runs with MP efforts. It can feel squirrely or unstable at times, and the fit leans narrow.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 3 days ago
It skyrocketed to his favourite shoe for fun medium-to-long runs, ahead of the Superblast and Monster Hyper. He'd run a marathon in it, and the upper and outsole are superb. Not a track shoe.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
A great jack-of-all-trades, up with the best all-rounders. More comfortable and stable than the Evo SL but not as fast. He'd pair it with a faster shoe for workouts and races.
Blog · Canadian Running – Michael Denomme · 3 days ago
Comfortable but very responsive, and 'might be close to perfect' for daily training, easy and long runs, and short races. Lighter than the plated v4.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+ overall: the Nitrofoam starts stiff but breaks in after 40-50 miles into a balanced ride. Durable, with little wear at 100 miles, and a slight lateral bias.
Blog · The Running Channel – Mark Dredge · 3 days ago
Simple, reliable, comfortable, stable and great value: his pick for 30-90 minute easy to steady runs. Not for workouts beyond short reps or hills, and it has no extra bounce.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks (coach) · 3 days ago
'The cushion we've been waiting for': felt good the whole way on runs up to 8 miles. Great for those not focused on speed, but not a light racer.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
One of, if not his favourite long-run shoe: protective, plenty of cushion, an effortless stride, and his pick for babying his legs after hard workouts. It competes with the Superblast for $20 less.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
Overall design A: a max-cushion recovery and long-run shoe. The heel took ~40 miles to break in, and there is almost no rubber wear at 25 miles.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Matt Kolat, Matt C, Kieran · 3 days ago
Very stable, with huge cushioning that's easy on the joints, good value and 'the best outsole on the market'. One tester K has no cons. One tester C had some Achilles pain after every run, possibly personal.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
“A real contender” (A- overall): high-performing and protective. The fit stabilized slightly wider after 20 miles, with only slight wear at 50 miles.
Blog · Supwell · 3 days ago
Still a favourite daily trainer of 2025 after 100 miles. The cushion has held up, but heel rubber wore significantly by 80 miles, exposing foam (others report the same). The fit is roomy.
Blog · Naver blog – 엽짱 (han7han) · 3 days ago
After 1,053 km he calls it the best daily trainer for him and rebought it (Grvl version). The wide toe box suits long runs. It fits roomy, so narrow feet should size down.
Blog · Sportega – Tadeáš Vyvijal · 3 days ago
Rated 9.5/10 and “one of the biggest surprises” he’s run in: soft, light and bouncy with a durable upper, and no foam breakdown at 400 km. The grippy rubber wears fast, and the heel feels loose for walking.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
'Brilliant, but watch out for that heel': bouncy, fast and fun for any training run, maybe even racing. The lightweight upper's heel design will rub some runners and is the shoe's only real downside.
Blog · Humble Running – Mike Postaski · 3 days ago
The cushion and feel still seem fresh out of the box after 520 miles, unlike anything he's run. But the heel collar tore up his Achilles in the first runs. A cheap felt-pad fix '100% solved' it.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 3 days ago
One of the biggest surprises of the year: an excellent, fantastically bouncy daily trainer at $150. One tester wouldn't use it for speed or race days.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
Overall design A-/A: a light, highly cushioned, soft-bouncy daily trainer with excellent traction. The toe box felt short until it broke in after two runs, and the medial forefoot overlay may irritate the big toe.
Blog · Weeviews · 3 days ago
Rated 5/5: awesome bounce, light, quiet, and a durable outsole with little wear at 100 miles. He felt some foot fatigue after a 16-miler and wouldn’t pick it for a full marathon. It’s not for runners who need stability.
Blog · Supwell · 3 days ago
Fun, bouncy and light (8.3 oz). There's no foam fatigue on long runs, and the foam still feels energetic past 200 miles with little outsole wear. A top pick of 2025.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
Both rate it B+/A-: the lightest version yet and a stable max-cushion shoe with a firmer foam, a rocker and wide flare. Good for pounding miles and easy days. A bit heavy, and the fit is snug up front.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 3 days ago
Smooth, stable and lighter-running than its weight suggests. It's less pillowy than older Bondis but rolls down the road nicely. Better looking too. A heavy shoe, best for easy days.
Blog · Doktor Nakano blog – Doktor Nakano · 3 days ago
Rated 4.5/5: stable thick cushioning and lighter than it looks. At 500 km the upper had no tears, but he retired it because of outsole wear, reduced cushioning and slippery wet roads and manhole covers. Heavy and narrow in use.
Blog · FueledByLOLZ · 3 days ago
Much better for running than the Ghost Max 2, with minimal outsole wear at 100 miles. However, it rides firmer than expected, is clunky and warm, and the upper gets heavy when wet. 'Fine' for easy runs, but not her first choice. The ASICS Superblast 2 feels easier.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 3 days ago
After 400 km the outsole looks nearly new, the DNA Tuned midsole has barely changed, and the upper shows no wear. Fun at many paces, from recovery runs to fartlek. Heavy and bulky, but that disappears once running.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross + team · 3 days ago
Possibly the comfiest Brooks yet, and more stable than its 45mm stack suggests. Great for long and easy runs and for heavier runners. The chunky look and stack will put some off.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
One tester rated it C+. Split verdict. Another tester (B+/A-) found it broke in and worked for easy and long runs with a durable outsole. One tester (C+) found it heavy and clunky, with a thick, ill-fitting upper, and her first run felt firm and uncomfortable.
Blog · Marathons.com – Clément Laborieux (+ Emma) · 3 days ago
One tester loved it for plateless long runs: versatile, and the one pair he'd travel with, with limited next-day soreness. The second tester was more mixed: no standout area. The sole is rigid at slow pace and the mesh could be more comfortable.
Blog · Running Westward Ho – Andy Hood · 3 days ago
Rated 6/10 and he won't buy another. It's stable and kinder to his Achilles than the Superblast 3, but 'firm without giving much back', doesn't want to hold a faster pace, and is 'just OK' on long runs.
Blog · GearJunkie – Mark Reif · 3 days ago
Energetic, light and near-plated speed without a plate, and fun in a 10K (8.4/10). The PWRRUN PB is on the firm side for plush easy miles, and the outsole’s exposed foam and CPU raise durability questions.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jessica Downey · 3 days ago
Editor's Choice. A lively, springy non-plated shoe that works for easy runs, faster workouts and short intervals, helped by a curved sole that rolls you forward.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks (coach) · 3 days ago
After 200 miles the cushioning still feels great and the outsole has held up very well. She still reaches for it over the newer Vomero Plus and Premium. Stable and smooth rather than mushy (93%).
Blog · Supwell · 3 days ago
One of the surprise shoes of 2025. A plush, stable max-cushion trainer that they kept reaching for over 100 miles, best for easy runs under about an hour.
Blog · runLab+ · 3 days ago
The tester found it light, breathable and lively, with a smooth forefoot rocker and full-coverage rubber showing no wear at 75 km. It is a shoe-of-the-year candidate, though the laces are too long and sizing should be tried in person.
Blog · 9to5 Runners – Eric · 3 days ago
Eric calls it a near do-it-all shoe, very close to the adidas EVO SL but with a better upper and more stability. The main hassle is sizing and buying it without trying it on.
Blog · Thích Chạy Bộ – Hiếu · 3 days ago
Hiếu calls it light, stable and durable: the lugs remained sharp and the foam had not bottomed out at 500 km. He swapped in a better insole and found it best at 4:00–7:00/km; he would not take it to a full marathon, and calves work harder below 4:00/km.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 3 days ago
Scott Hilton says it fits the hype: one of the best rocker geometries he has run, with fun, responsive TPEE foam and a very breathable upper. He would race a marathon in it. Thin, long laces and small eyelets are the main cons; some wear appeared at 100 miles.
Blog · chrisis.now · 3 days ago
He found it a pleasant surprise at its low price: light and lively. The laces feel cheap, and the ride is slightly unstable.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown, Andrea Myers · 3 days ago
Both had poor heel lockdown that no lacing fixed, and one tester called it a dealbreaker. To them it felt firmer and clunkier than v2 for midfoot strikers. Another tester still liked it for easy and long runs (overall B+/A-), while one tester gave it a B.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jane McGuire · 3 days ago
Jane McGuire describes a plush, bouncy shoe for recovery and long runs. Her heel slipped until she tightened the laces, and the heel clip may not suit everyone.
Blog · Run4it – Finlay McAndrew · 3 days ago
Finlay McAndrew says the bounce held up beyond 500 miles and the outsole is barely worn. He sometimes had heel slip, which a runner’s loop fixes.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Jeff Dengate · 3 days ago
Jeff Dengate describes a soft, bouncy ride, great fit and reliable grip. Testers found it very loud and slappy, with little get-up-and-go at fast paces.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers · 3 days ago
One tester (B+) found it responsive but now neutral rather than stable-neutral, with moderate durability and outsole wear by 50 miles. Another tester (C+/C) got ITB soreness that she blamed on the medial forefoot bias and soft midsole.
Blog · Gritty Runners – Paulo Quindere Saraiva · 3 days ago
Paulo Quindere Saraiva’s first impressions are positive: it came alive after about 25 miles, with excellent wet grip and a smooth ride at marathon pace. The heel feels slightly blocky, and durability is still unknown.
Blog · RuncerLAB / shonanrun.com · 3 days ago
He uses it as his go-to for 30 km long runs, praising trampoline-like bounce and enough protection for high mileage. He would not race in it; rebound fades after about 400 km.
Blog · chrisis.now · 3 days ago
Calls it his biggest disappointment: much softer than v2, wear visible after 100 km, felt dead by ~250 km, and retired at 350 km.
Blog · Run & Smile · 3 days ago
Run & Smile found the ride soft without sinking, with a springy toe-off that comes alive when pushed, and good leg protection over 20 km. Its sweet spot is easy, long and tempo runs up to half-marathon effort; it is too soft for fast track reps, and wet grip is weak at faster paces.
Blog · shuichi-running.com — Runshu · 3 days ago
Calls it the best in the line: the bounce of v3 with the stability of v4, light and easy to turn over, with excellent fit. Midsole still bouncy at 700 km; ideal for easy and long runs up to moderate effort. Only real weakness is wet grip.
Blog · The Sunny One — Sam · 3 days ago
Sam says it was comfortable from the first step, with no break-in. Its springy bounce mellowed into a deeper, plusher ride after about 75 miles, ideal for easy and recovery runs and slow long runs over 12 miles. It is too soft for tempo, with mediocre wet traction.
Blog · Supwell — Meredith Johnston · 3 days ago
Meredith Johnston describes a plush, very comfortable step-in and a protective long-run cruiser that improved with miles. The 10 mm drop felt chunky and somewhat unstable at the heel; it was firmer and less bouncy for lighter runners, and the outsole showed noticeable wear by 100 miles.
Blog · Doctors of Running — Matt Klein · 3 days ago
Matt Klein sees it as a more balanced take on the Invincible: bouncy without being mushy, best for daily, long and moderate uptempo runs, with barely worn outsole at 100 miles. It is slightly unstable as the hips fatigue after 8–10 miles, has a tapered toe box and feels sluggish faster than tempo pace.
Blog · Runner’s World — Jeff Dengate · 3 days ago
Highest-rated shoe in testing that year: soft heel landing but firms up for toe-off, handles 5K pace to 20-milers, and still felt protective and bouncy near 450 miles. Gripes: tongue slides sideways and a slightly loose heel.
Blog · note.com — Tomo the morning runner · 3 days ago
A self-described Nike fan won over by it: propulsive without a plate, legs stay fresh on 22 km runs, and the outsole shows almost no wear past 900-1000 km. Cautions: slippery on wet roads, a bit loose for narrow feet, not great for walking.
Blog · The Running Channel — Mark Dredge · 3 days ago
Mark Dredge found it comfortable and responsive at 500 km, a little softer and more lived-in than a new pair, with foam creasing and a big-toe wear spot on the upper. He expects another 300–500 km. The main caution is that it can feel unstable for runners without good ankle or foot control.
Blog · Vertical Runner — Emily & Matt · 3 days ago
A smooth, reliable long-run workhorse: soft-but-firm, slightly bouncier than v1, roomy toe box, no hot spots. 250+ miles in and it 'still looks fresh'; one tester says it works for easy days and as a race shoe up to the marathon.
Blog · RunToTheFinish — Amanda Brooks · 3 days ago
Amanda Brooks found it stable despite the 45 mm stack, with a consistent ride through about 200 miles and foam that has not gone mushy. The outsole still grips on wet roads, and she expects another 200–300 miles. The toe box felt short and shallow at first; the $200 price is the main drawback.
Blog · The Sunny One — Sam · 3 days ago
Found it stiff and firm at first and nearly returned it, but it clicked around mile 20–30. It is now the go-to for tempo and long runs, with snappy energy return; too firm for easy and recovery days, where the Novablast 5 is preferred.
RunningRecs · Priya · 11 days ago
Around 250 miles in and these are my go to for Sunday long runs now. Coming from a worn out pair of Brooks Ghosts, the soft landing is the first thing you notice and my shins thank me after 10 milers. Not a fast shoe, it feels a bit dead if you try to pick up the pace, but I am not racing anyone. Fit is true to size for me.
RunningRecs · Tom Brennan · 11 days ago
I'm 41, running about 30 miles a week with a long run on Sundays that creeps up to 16-18 when I'm training for a spring marathon. Came over from Novablast 3 and was prepared to hate the Superblast because of the reviews calling it firm. It is a bit firm for the first 20 miles, then it settles into this springy, stable thing that just keeps going. Did a 20 miler in them last month and my legs felt better at the end than they have in any other shoe I've owned. Roughly 300 miles on the pair so far and the outsole looks barely touched. Fit is true to size with a roomy toe box for me. Not a light shoe and I wouldn't race a 5k in them, but for easy days and long ones they're the best money I've spent on shoes this year.
RunningRecs · T.K. · 11 days ago
Loved the 9 so i just rebought the same line without thinking. Big mistake. The 10 feels firmer underfoot and a bit clunky, and on my overpronating foot the outside edge of the heel feels wobbly on every landing. About 100 miles in and my shin is grumbling. Still an ok shoe for slow shuffles, but i wont be buying a third pair.
YouTube · RUN WITH BENNY · 16 days ago
Not their pick for fast daily sessions, but a standout for training runs over about 15 km. The dense, energetic yet forgiving PEBA foam stays lively however far they run, with a roomy toe box, good midfoot lockdown and sticky outsole grip. Downsides are a slight wobble when walking (gone once running), a stiff non-stretch upper that only just breathes enough, and no second eyelet for runner's lacing.
YouTube · fabRunning · 16 days ago
About 100 km over a few weeks, across several types of runs. They name it their super trainer of the year: light for its stack, soft and cushioned yet responsive, with a padded tongue and collar, and a midsole and outsole that still look nearly new at 100 km. Complaints are minor: the upper does not hug the foot well, needing extra tightening in the forefoot, and there is no lace loop for runner's lacing. They say it suits heel, midfoot and forefoot strikers, from easy runs to race day.
YouTube · Sagasu Running · 16 days ago
Impressions after about 182 miles (292 km), calling the ride springy and suited to any pace from recovery to race effort. They found durability outstanding, with only light outsole wear and just a slight softening of the foam after roughly 140 miles. The upper has plenty of volume, not narrow, though one foot felt a little loose in the forefoot as it wore in, and the stock laces were swapped for better lockdown.
YouTube · kofuzi · 17 days ago
Over 100 miles, mostly easy runs of 7 to 9 miles, plus a couple of threshold sessions and some treadmill runs. They found it lightweight, comfortable and energetic, still feeling lively late in testing, with little wear on the outsole and upper. They expect the PEBA foam to give up a little long-term durability, but call it a versatile daily trainer they would recommend to a wide range of runners.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes · 22 days ago
Wears them casually and calls them the most comfortable shoes they've owned; with bad knees and mild plantar fasciitis, the cushioning reduces impact and makes standing much easier.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 22 days ago
A 155 lb runner has 420 miles on their Vomero Plus; it is mostly dead now and they will retire it around 450, with three more pairs waiting. Calls it an awesome shoe that can still pick up the pace when needed.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 23 days ago
Can only wear the Adizero EVO SL comfortably for 8-12 miles; an 18-miler in them was miserable.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
Started running in the Clifton 10 in wide and got about 525 miles out of them before replacing.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
With a EEE-wide foot, doesn't love the Superblast 2's fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 24 days ago
Regrets them after 200 km: holes in the toe-box mesh and visible outsole wear.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 25 days ago
Bought three pairs because they are so amazing.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Loved earlier Superblasts but doesn't like this version at all.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
The best shoe they've ever worn, with excellent energy return and fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Hated it at first, but it went through two marathons and is still going at 600 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Loves them; bought them for one use and ended up loving them for another.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Very firm, with outstanding wet grip and a slightly tapered toe box; a possible successor to their tired Superblast 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Firm and snappy rather than plush.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Owns three pairs and loves them, but they're firm and left their feet very sore after a marathon.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Their favourite shoe, ahead of the Vomero Plus and MagMax 2; handles recovery runs to 16+ miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Their daily trainer: firm in a good way and gave them their confidence back.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Uncomfortably firm and narrow in the toe box for wide feet, though the outsole grips everywhere.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Disappointed with it despite liking firm foam for their knees.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
After trying many brands, one of two shoes they settled on; surprisingly versatile for a 190 lb runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
One of their two near-perfect main shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Nearly 300 km for a very heavy runner and no sign of bottoming out.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
It hurt their ankles badly when they ran in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Loved them for over a year, but now they feel big, clunky and boring.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 28 days ago
First 15 km: firm, stable and well made with good wet grip, but narrower and a little heavier than the Clifton 10.
YouTube · kofuzi · 30 days ago
About 100 miles across long runs, steady runs, daily miles and recovery jogs. They like it best as a speedy long-run shoe from easy pace up to marathon effort, where the foam feels energetic yet cushioned. It started out a bit firm for easy days but softened with use, and they would not pick it for speed work because of its height and weight. Roomy toe box, no heel chafing, and the upper and outsole wore well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 30 days ago
2,500 km in with the outsole intact and the foam unchanged.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 30 days ago
Loves them and bought a second pair; stability took time to get used to.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
Gave them shin splints after 300 miles: too much stack for how soft it is and not stable enough.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
Preferred to the Superblast 3: noticeably more stable after 150 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
1,106 km across easy runs and marathon blocks before buying another pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
800 km in: felt flat and dull around 500 km but kept going.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
One of the shoes that works best for them.
YouTube · The Old Ultra Runner · 33 days ago
A little over 50 miles, mostly shorter runs plus 25 comfortable miles in a hot six-hour race. They find the 100% PEBA foam soft and bouncy, with a mild rocker and big landing area, and the outsole shows almost no wear. Downsides: the forefoot scoops in, so wide feet may struggle, the upper is not very breathable, there is no runner's loop hole, and their pair weighed 202 g and 214 g left to right. They suspect the midsole will wear out before the outsole.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Rock hard at first, softened after 30-40 km into a bouncy middle ground for long and daily runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Feels dead and boring at 150 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Dead-feeling forefoot foam for mid/forefoot strikers.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Liked it until the Superblast 2; went back and hated it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Caused immediate Achilles and midfoot pain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 34 days ago
Retired at 1,000 miles with the foam still in good shape.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 35 days ago
520 km over a whole training block in tropical heat: their legs recovered and long runs grew from 12 to 17 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 35 days ago
The most durable running shoe they've owned.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 35 days ago
Their easy-day shoe, lasting about 850 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 35 days ago
Loves them enough to buy two more pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 35 days ago
Feels very wobbly to them compared with the Vomero 18.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 36 days ago
Has put almost 1,300 miles on their first pair of the Vomero Plus.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 36 days ago
Their Glycerin 23s are comfy but have no energy return and are heavy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 36 days ago
Fantastic for a heavy runner, unlike the Ride 19.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 37 days ago
About 80 km over a month, covering easy runs, a 32 km progressive run, a parkrun, marathon-pace sessions and some track work. They found it very comfortable, soft and bouncy with plenty of energy return, plus a full-coverage, grippy outsole. Downsides are a slightly narrow fit that needed looser laces, only moderate stability with a slightly wobbly feel, and less responsiveness for fast track reps. Best for steady daily and long running.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Owns four pairs of the Hyperboost Edge and plans to keep buying it. Calls it the best all-round shoe, good for pushing the pace, comfort and distance alike.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Light, plush yet responsive with great grip; handled recovery to marathon-pace runs, and they now prefer it to the Vomero Plus.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Took over from their Ride 19 almost completely.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Light, bouncy and fun, unlike the 22 and 23.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Too soft, long, wide and high around the ankle for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Their favourite daily trainer in years; cheaper and more durable than the Superblast 3.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Soft, very protective and a good fit for wider feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 38 days ago
A runner finds the Neo Vista 2 soft, with its rocker and plate keeping it moving and stable.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 39 days ago
Testing the Neo Zen on a treadmill, a runner found it unstable and the upper bothered their Achilles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 39 days ago
Prefers it (or the Red Hare 9 Ultra) for proper marathon-training long runs.
YouTube · Jack Runs · 41 days ago
A marathon-training runner covered over 600 km in the shoe, mostly on easy 22-24 km midweek long runs and 14 km recovery runs. They called it the softest shoe they have used, comfortable and stable on tired legs, and a better recovery shoe than the Superblast 2. The outsole grip held up well and the foam still felt lively, and they said tempo effort is its best pace range. They would buy it again as a high-mileage workhorse.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 41 days ago
A new runner's comfortable easy-run shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 41 days ago
Their dedicated long-run shoe, with no complaints.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 41 days ago
Never worked for them and felt horrible.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 45 days ago
Their favourite daily and long-run shoe across 160 miles: bouncy, grippy and holding up very well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 45 days ago
A month in: comfortable, surprisingly bouncy and motivating for everyday heel-striking runs at 6:00/km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 45 days ago
Lasted 640+ miles before the cushioning gave out.
YouTube · Bertram · 46 days ago
A bigger runner covered 100 miles in the shoe in Florida heat, using it for daily miles, long runs and some fartlek. They found the upper very breathable and light, and the outsole, though chewed up, held up well. They described the cushioning as a middle ground, neither too soft nor too firm, which made recovery easier on their knees and hips. They felt it is not designed for top-end speed and suits high-weekly-mileage runners who want a soft daily shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 46 days ago
280 miles: wildly bouncy and fun at first, settling down later; not as soft or comfy as reviews claim, with a slightly stiff upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 46 days ago
Their favourite shoe of the year after 780 miles; a Cadillac-smooth ride.
YouTube · The Old Ultra Runner · 47 days ago
An ultra runner tested them over 200 km (124 miles), including more than 90 miles of a multi-day 100-mile event in hot weather. They liked the light weight, the bouncy but not squishy midsole, the early rocker, the breathable upper and good comfort even at slow paces and walking. Outsole wear was minimal and they expect it to last far longer. Their only complaint was the long, thin laces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 47 days ago
At 381 miles for a 200 lb runner: the best-wearing outsole they've owned.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 47 days ago
On their third pair with 900+ km on earlier ones and barely any foam damage.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 48 days ago
Like the Deviate Nitro 2 but more padded and less aggressive; runs a bit long and wide.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 48 days ago
A great long-distance cruiser for a 180 lb runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 49 days ago
Light, fun, stable and efficient; likely their new workhorse, though outsole coverage is limited.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 49 days ago
One of their favourite running shoes last year.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 49 days ago
Felt heavy for running; now a great walking shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
40 miles in and loves it: agile and connected with a snappy plated toe-off.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
Less punchy than the Evo SL but no next-day soreness.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
400 miles of comfortable mileage with a traditional feel, though not very propulsive.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
Plate pushes them forward for intervals, but calves were tired the next day and heel strikers get little bounce.
YouTube · Long Runner · 51 days ago
About 300 miles, mostly recovery and easy runs at roughly 8 to 9 minute miles. They liked the very noticeable trampoline-like bounce and the durability, though the midsole had lost a little bounce by the end. Drawbacks: the constant bounce was sometimes jarring and tiring beyond an hour to 90 minutes, heel lockdown could be better with slight slippage, and the upper is only borderline breathable in heat. Best for easy-pace runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 51 days ago
A complete, multi-role shoe up to tempo pace with a stable midsole and very comfortable upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 52 days ago
Awesome for short and long runs alongside their Evo SL.
YouTube · Every Run Counts · 53 days ago
Over 400 km (about 250 miles), mostly on road with some canal path and light trail. They saw no significant wear, good wet traction and foam that still felt springy. Minor complaints: a crease that forms when the laces are tightened on one foot, and some lace fraying. The shoe rolls onto the forefoot, so they prefer it at faster paces for medium long runs, speed days and warm-ups, and wear a different shoe for very easy runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 53 days ago
Their first 10k in the Novablast 6 felt amazing.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 53 days ago
Retired at 1,000 km with almost no damage and still bouncier than many rivals; upper only average.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 53 days ago
Feels almost new at 1,000 km; stable and versatile for long runs, tempos and easy days.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 53 days ago
Solid recovery shoe they retired, but heavy, water-logging and loud.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 54 days ago
73 miles including two halves: leg-saving, light for its size, wide-foot friendly, but soft foam can feel unstable.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 54 days ago
Bouncy and comfortable, but the instability hurt their hips during half training.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 55 days ago
Handles easy pace fine without pushing too hard.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
No ankle collar rub from the Hyperboost Edge, but lockdown was poor above recovery pace until they added an extra eyelet for a heel lock.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
Their all-time favourite once it stopped grating their Achilles; 700 km and fading for 2+ hour runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
Hated running in it, and was glad to replace it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
Legs felt fresh after 14 miles; didn't feel heavy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
Loves it for easy runs, but it's causing Achilles discomfort at 150 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
The midsole gave out after about 20 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 57 days ago
Kind to bunions and amazingly cushioned for recovery, easy and long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 57 days ago
Kind to the bunions on both of their feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 57 days ago
A spectacular first run: light, fast, no break-in, better upper than the Evo SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 57 days ago
The best shoe they own for running and walking.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 57 days ago
Fine for short slow recoveries but dead at faster pace with a narrow toe box.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes - Road Running Reviews · 58 days ago
Bought a used pair cheaply and set 5k and 10k personal bests in them, saying the hype is justified.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 58 days ago
Retiring them at 200 km: unstable and their feet hurt.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 58 days ago
Pillowy step-in comfort but no energy return, like a kitchen mat, after 160 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 58 days ago
Feels awesome, but the heel slippage is frustrating.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 58 days ago
A great shoe they prefer overall to the Speed line.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 58 days ago
Sold after one run: the arch was too high for flat feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Likes it, but it feels like a lot of shoe and every run takes extra effort.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Their long-run shoe through three pairs, but each new pair felt worse than the first.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Gave up after 100 miles: liked the foam but the geometry felt cumbersome and slappy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Never did much for them and unstable at low speeds.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Reliable for tempo and long runs: responsive, padded, stable and light.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Awesome at 7:30/mi and faster, but the rigid plate is uncomfortable at recovery pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Hasn't wanted to run in anything else; any pace feels effortless.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
140 km: narrow in the midfoot, unstable, and legs feel bad the next day.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Excels from easy to threshold; slight loss of bounce at 400 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 60 days ago
700 miles and still fine, unlike other daily trainers that went flat.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 60 days ago
Little pop for a light forefoot striker and too much shoe; didn't last much past 300 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 60 days ago
A bit too bouncy and wobbly for someone who prefers firmer, lower shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 60 days ago
A pretty good first run in it last night.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
A runner uses the Clifton PRO as a daily trainer and finds it better than expected, if a little overpriced.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
500 km in: a tank for daily and recovery miles for bigger runners, lively enough to pick up pace, with an exceptional outsole and no lockdown issues.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
The best running shoe they've had as a 225 lb slower runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Runs hot and feels heavy for a lighter runner, but grew on them and has lots of life left near 350 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Over 450 miles on one pair and no foam degradation noticed on the second.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Retired at 1,100 km because of occasional arch pain, though it still had life left.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
On their third pair; the cushioning makes recovery days feel great.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Took this 220 lb runner from 3 to 12 miles in two months.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Now meh after 120 miles: too much upper, a heel counter that bothered their Haglund's, and a less durable outsole than expected.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Ran a 220 km backyard ultra in them without changing shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Too much padding, foam and rubber: far too bulky.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Became too soft after about 100 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 61 days ago
Only 300 miles before the heel rubber peeled off.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 62 days ago
Loves the EVO SL ATR on non-technical trails, including 27 km runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 62 days ago
Nice cushioning with some snap for long runs at 8:30 pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 63 days ago
500 miles over two pairs; less bouncy past 350–400 miles but still fine for easy runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 63 days ago
Total meh apart from a great toe box; offers nothing over their Vomero Plus, so they're going back.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 64 days ago
The best daily shoe they have ever used.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 65 days ago
Narrower and stiffer than the original without any pop.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 65 days ago
Magical, and it fit their feet really well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 65 days ago
Felt a bit awkward at easy pace and lacked pop for strides, but fantastic around marathon pace; very light, stable and more rockered than it looks.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 66 days ago
Owns the Leili 2.0 GT, Red Hare 9 Ultra and XiaoNian; the GT is now their favorite, nimble and light with explosive pop.
YouTube · RUN SDJ · 69 days ago
Just over 100 km of daily, long (up to about 15 km), recovery and tempo runs, by a flat-arched runner around 180 lb. It felt noticeably firm at first but grew on them: true to size, no heel slip, very stable from easy pace to tempo, and grippy in the wet. Downsides are a ride that isn't especially fun and running a bit warm in hot weather. A dependable, lightweight daily shoe, especially for runners who value stability.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 69 days ago
Great for medium to hard efforts from 5K to 10+ miles: firm and snappy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 70 days ago
A planned short 5 miles became a fast 12; feels like a luxury car and the weight doesn't bother them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 72 days ago
Loved the XiaoNian on the first run: good at easy pace and quick on 1-minute efforts, running faster than planned.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 72 days ago
Their calves are struggling to adjust to the XiaoNian's rocker with the stock thin insoles, so they rotate it with another trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Of all their adidas shoes, the Hyperboost Edge is the only one that gives them major blisters on the big toes, and it is not usable for running for them. They find the toe box very different from other adidas models.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Their first pair of EVO SL was the best shoe they had run in, so they bought a second. The second pair, made in a different factory, felt unresponsive and clunky by comparison.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
They love the bounce of the Hyperboost Edge but feel the upper suffocates their foot, and they wish it came in a wide version.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
They switched to the EVO SL for marathon training and found it so comfortable that they bought a second pair to alternate. They find it better suited to tempo work than to easy pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
They run 1200 to 2000 miles a year in an all-adidas stable and call the EVO SL and Adios Pro 4 an elite pairing for road running.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
They own the EVO SL alongside Supernova Prima 2 and Supernova Rise, and as a tall, heavy runner who needs decent cushioning they love all of them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
They state in passing that they have loved the EVO SL while asking about the Hyperboost midsole foam.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Owns the Adistar 4 and calls them probably the most comfortable shoes they've ever worn; they're disappointed the Adistar 5 moved to a narrower fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Their daily trainer; loves it and it keeps getting better with wear.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Got Achilles tendonitis for the first time a couple of months after adding it to their rotation.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 74 days ago
Loved them but too narrow; smashed their little toe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 75 days ago
40 miles in after hip pain in the Vomero Plus: stable, planted and a classic do-it-all shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 75 days ago
Felt like a brick to them, unlike smoother-rolling shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 75 days ago
Dislikes it: unstable, the medial side lets their feet cave in and slower runs leave their ankles beaten up.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 76 days ago
Firmer and much more stable than other super trainers; one of the few that never bothers their picky knees and feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 76 days ago
Firm-side and stable enough at easy and steady paces, but not at faster ones.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 76 days ago
Better than the Megablast, Dynafish and Red Hare 9 Ultra for this wide-footed runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 76 days ago
Runs small and narrow, blistered their big toe, poor heel lockdown, average foam.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
They are a recent user who loves the Hyperboost Edge and uses it for long runs and recovery days within an all-adidas rotation. Their one complaint is the breathability of the upper.
YouTube · Tyson Arellano · 77 days ago
Put 660 miles into the shoe after shin splints, including marathon training for their first marathon, and calls it their go-to shoe. They like the plush, bouncy cushioning, the roomy true-to-size fit with no hot spots, and how much fresher their legs felt after long runs than in an Evo SL or Endorphin Speed 5. It is bulky and not fast, the forefoot outsole wore away and grip is somewhat reduced, the midsole compressed noticeably, and it felt a little unstable when new (more stable now). They rate it worth $180.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes - Road Running Reviews · 77 days ago
Shot after 299 miles in a big rotation, with the rear grip falling off, which they find poor for a 200 pound shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
Loves it; a really firm ride that reminds them of the Boston 10/11, though fans of squishy foam may not like it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
Feels like a premium EVO SL and is their current favourite, though the upper doesn't suit everyone so try it on first.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
Very light and bouncy with a good fit, far more stable than the EVO SL and grippy; best at easy paces and now one of their top daily trainers.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
After three pairs of Novablast 5 they find the XiaoNian foam lasts much longer and is much firmer.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 78 days ago
Two testers in one review. One ran about 40 km, including two 10Ks and a mixed-pace 7-miler, and was split: a roomy, plush, comfortable fit, but the soft foam felt sinky and sluggish at easy paces and too much shoe when faster. The other, after about 60 km with a couple of long runs, found it smooth, stable and very comfortable for easy and long distance, but not at home at steady faster paces. The thick outsole is built for durability.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 78 days ago
Gives them their lowest heart rate on easy runs, about a minute per km faster at the same heart rate than other daily shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 78 days ago
First run: the best Nike shoe in a while for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 79 days ago
They call the Skyward X 2 an underrated long run and uptempo shoe, especially at sale price and for those who like a pronounced rocker.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 79 days ago
As an overpronator, finds it one of the two most unstable shoes they have worn.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 79 days ago
Incredible grip; ran on ice and snow without problems.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 80 days ago
The sole looks awful at 400 km, unlike their SB2 after 1,000 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 80 days ago
First quick run: slightly more spacious than the Leili 2.0 with lots of toe room and height, though the upper feels more plasticky.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 80 days ago
First run: the ride seems lovely, like an EVO SL, but the upper felt a touch less breathable on a hot day.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 83 days ago
Returning them: loves the lightness and bounce but got lateral pinky-toe pain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 83 days ago
Same size as two pairs of Skyward X, but the right X 2 shoe crushes their toes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 84 days ago
Good for 7-11 mile runs, not enjoyed beyond that.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 84 days ago
The original EVO SL is still their favourite for its midsole and loose upper fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 84 days ago
Too soft and uncomfortable for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 84 days ago
Close to a Pegasus Premium but can't find a place for it in their rotation.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 86 days ago
A 10 km first run: far more stable with better grip than the Evo SL, but heavier and hard to sprint in.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 86 days ago
A 90 kg slow runner rates it 4-5/5 against the Superblast 3: comfortable, predictable cushioning and effortless to hold a quick pace, for a third of the price.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 86 days ago
A big disappointment: a massive block of dense, boring foam.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 86 days ago
Feels incredible for recovery and easy paces.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes · 87 days ago
After six months in flat, hard Puma shoes, running feels much easier: their first 14-mile run was faster and needed only one recovery day instead of two.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 87 days ago
One of the best ASICS they've owned: comfortable on longer fast runs and nearly perfect for everyday tempo work.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 88 days ago
A big fan: runs about 30-45 s/mile faster at the same effort, though it may suit only a narrow range of mechanics.
