Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
After 250+ miles, including several half marathons, she calls it a great daily trainer and a great upgrade: breathable, comfortable all over, durable and well made, working exceptionally well for faster mid-distance runs and part of her rotation for every speed workout. It's a little pricey, and the upper shows dirt.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A balanced, lightweight trainer with decent responsiveness that does a bit of everything, cushioned enough for long runs, and good value. One tester would like livelier foam and more forefoot width. Another tester loved the firm, neutral ride (13.5 miles without issue), but the toe box hurt until ~15 miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A very well-built daily trainer that will last you miles, with long-lasting comfort, a smooth ride, a stylish look and an upper that delivers on many levels. It can wear many hats but falls short when you want a PR. Despite the 'max' name it's firmer than expected and less soft than rivals.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Excellent cushioning for fans of firm rockers: great for easy rhythmic miles, stable for a neutral shoe thanks to good sidewalls, and a good walking and standing shoe. The foam lacks pop at speed, the laces bite through the tongue, and at $180 it lacks rivals' versatility. Too firm for some.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester sees it as an improvement on the Cloudeclipse and a redemption after v2 flop: a nicer, more dialed-in upper, no loud speedboard, a smooth ride, the same $180. Another tester, on his first On, was impressed: good-looking, a pleasant ride, and minimal wear after 50+ miles.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A good daily trainer for up to 5 miles: lightweight, breathable and durable, with little to no wear after well over 100 miles. The midsole falls short on longer runs, and it runs small. She loves it most for all-day wear and walking, and recommends it for people who stand all workday.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
One tester: a nice training shoe with good rhythm, a durable build, a steady forefoot rocker, mild-to-moderate responsiveness, good cushioning and lockdown; fair value at $160.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One tester: a utilitarian daily trainer at best, not the worst shoe you'll buy but not one you'll long to run in; On is treading water on innovation. An average addition that proves On's inconsistency. A third tester finds it fine but with nothing excellent: OK for 3–6 miles, then monotonous.
Blog · Startline wa doko desu ka? – Shibuken · 2 days ago
He switched into it at 15 km of a rainy overnight 100 km run and ran the last ~80 km in it. It stayed dry until ~60 km, then water seeped in at the ankle; it's not a rain boot. Amazingly, no blisters at all, even with soaked feet. Slippery on wet manholes. A buy for people who run or go out in the rain.
Blog · Rundefeated – Rizqa Lahuddin · 2 days ago
A reliable, comfortable cushioned daily trainer: Fresh Foam X that's soft without being mushy, and monsoon-proof grip on wet asphalt, tiles and painted road lines. Understated looks work for the office, and it gives ~90% of the 1080/More experience for less. Great for long runs, not for speed sessions.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Jessica O'Donnell · 2 days ago
A great high-cushion daily trainer for easy miles: soft and forgiving without being squishy, with a smooth rocker that rolls you forward, a true-to-size accommodating fit, a breathable upper and secure stretch laces. When she picked up the pace it felt too soft to respond; not for intervals or races.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A simple, soft shoe for easy running and walking: soft cushioning, a mildly flexible rocker, a wider fit, decent durability at 30 miles and solid value at $145. But the midsole bottoms out and isn't responsive, it's mostly unstable, and the heel padding irritates. Fine for walking, not for his running needs.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Ally Arcuri · 2 days ago
Simple, affordable and light at 7.2 oz: the soft DNA Loft heel absorbs landings, good for casual runs, recovery days, heel strikers and everyday wear. The thin 22 mm forefoot feels flat on uptempo moments with minimal energy return, and the high heel slightly undermines stability in sharp turns.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A classic high-drop neutral trainer with a moderate stack and flexible forefoot: a great starter shoe that won't break the bank, with a durable, reliable, very stable ride. The fit is snug and low-volume, bounce and responsiveness are unexciting, and he hoped for more; it lacks pace versatility.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Chad Zimmermann & Lindsay Agro · 2 days ago
One tester disliked fit and heat. Brooks hasn't messed up the gravy train: if you loved v17 and earlier, this will do the trick again, though he prefers the lower-drop Ghost Max. One tester really wanted to like it but fought it: it suits only tiny toes and little need for airflow, so it's a walking shoe for her.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 2 days ago
He really enjoyed it. He set out to test outsole durability after wearing through v7s in 190 miles, and was surprised by the much more dynamic foam. He'd like a more breathable upper that wicks rather than absorbs. A strong zero-drop daily trainer. Incentivized review.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
She liked the P35x midsole, the best foam yet, plus the lower stack and lighter weight. But Altra failed at its signature feature: the low-volume toe box with a lateral sidewall caused severe 5th MTP pain and limited her runs. A nice neutral zero-drop trainer only for narrower forefeet. $160 is a bit overpriced.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
A cushioned 4 mm-drop daily trainer with a good rhythmic rocker and firmer cushioning one tester likes, but he chewed through much of the outsole in 27 miles and the fit is slightly long. Another tester found it snug for an Altra yet stable. At $160 versatility is limited, and the forefoot lacks classic Altra width.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
Altra calls it max cushion, but to him it's a firm shoe with maximum cushioning, far less soft than the Glycerin Max or MagMax Nitro. As with the original Via Olympus there's a disconnect: a comfortable upper and impressive stack, but the EGO FLO ride undercuts it. This time he's not going with the FLO.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Markus Zinkl · 2 days ago
A genuinely good daily trainer at a really attractive price, with build quality equal to models costing €30–40 more. The upper should fit a wide range of foot shapes, and the Boost and Bounce combination surprised him. The only compromise as an all-rounder is at higher paces. Score 8.83/10.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
Adidas finally delivers a practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor heavy. The upper rivals pricier shoes: comfortable, true to size, roomy with no pressure points and an excellent heel hold. At $100 it's an incredible value under 10 oz, though he wishes the forefoot were a bit less soft and mellow.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Jim Coulson · 2 days ago
A practical daily trainer that's neither elite nor clunky, and one of the better $100 shoes he's run in a while: light, with a breathable upper, excellent rear hold and traction. Energy return is low to moderate, and he'd like a livelier forefoot. It runs half a size small. Ideal for logging long easy miles.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
Rated 95%, one of their top scores of the year: a lightweight, nicely cushioned shoe that suits many runners and lets you run without thinking about your shoe. The tweaked PWRRUN adds energy return, and the upper is super breathable. Its main drawback is a narrow midfoot fit, and the lace loops raise durability worries.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
The ground feel was strange after high-stack trainers, but he enjoyed it more with every run. A 14-miler with 4:00/km segments sold him: responsive with enough protection. It's light, with a very comfortable upper. Minor lateral outsole wear showed by 50 miles, though he still expects 300+ miles away from abrasive surfaces.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Justin Alpaugh · 2 days ago
A lightweight trainer meant for speed and short easy miles, with an affordable price and a nice upper, but it still lacks cushioning for longer days and the outsole is a weak point. He likes its simple design but says it just doesn't have a home in his rotation: even for an easy 4-miler he has more fun options.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & David Salas · 2 days ago
An extremely light plateless trainer and workout or racing shoe, with smooth, natural transitions for speedwork and a permanent spot in one tester's rotation. Midsole sidewalls add surprising guidance. The midfoot is slightly baggy, the forefoot needs breaking in, and it's too minimal beyond ~10 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Kaleb Kabakjian & Ruby Wyles · 2 days ago
One tester sees Saucony starting to make a classic of the line for the modern age: lower stack and a simpler upper, moving the right way for original fans while still suiting everyday runners. The firm-at-first foam softens after a few miles. Another tester was won over by its inherent stability and ground connection, which make her feel nimble.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Michael Mason-D'Croz · 2 days ago
No frills, just a quality shoe that gets the job done for a great price. It performed incredibly well on short quick runs, long runs and tempos, with grip that feels secure. Saucony didn't mess with a good thing, and putting it on felt like a reunion. The upper gets hot on hot runs.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
That rare bargain shoe that rides like pricier rivals: a rocker propels you forward, and one tester felt no forefoot or heel restrictions while upping tempo and enduring hard pavement with no discomfort days later. Some testers wanted more support.
Blog · Fordy Runs – Fordy · 2 days ago
Mild tweaks rather than a reinvention: a resculpted midsole, new mesh and extra tongue and heel padding. The ride and midsole feel so similar to v4, which can be had for as little as £65, that it makes more financial sense to buy v4 now and pick up v5 once it's discounted.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A lightweight daily trainer for logging the majority of your miles, with great cushioning for its stack. The fit may be a touch narrow for some, and the flexible forefoot won't work for everyone.
Blog · Marathons.com – Clément Laborieux · 2 days ago
Not disappointing only because he expected nothing special, sad for such a historic line. It has secure lockdown, excellent durability and reliable grip, but at 300 g it's one of the heaviest daily trainers, the foam lacks responsiveness, propulsion is minimal, and it's not versatile. Nike needs more meaningful updates.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
At first it fell flat: after bouncy rivals his midfoot strikes thunked down, like a Mazda 3 after a BMW. It grew on him as a sporty all-rounder. At $145 in an age of $200 trainers it's a solid bargain and one-shoe quiver for easy runs, long runs and tempos, especially for newer runners. It remains relatively firm.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
Noteworthy updates make the ride smoother and a little more energetic than v41 while keeping the feel that made it popular. It's good value, durable and comfortable for easy daily training, but unlikely to win new fans: less cushioned than rivals, heavy for a lowish stack, and not great for faster runs.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Paul Soriano · 2 days ago
A joy to run in from the first run, and after 100+ mi the upper shows no wear or tearing, with a soft midsole, durable outsole and good traction. The TPU plate doesn't deliver the responsiveness it promises, and rocks get stuck in the canyon-like outsole grooves.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Decent and budget-friendly, with soft, slightly bouncy FuelCell, decent breathability and wet-pavement grip, and no issues in testing. Comfort is decent rather than exceptional, the midfoot cutout collects rocks on gravel and dirt, and many shoes that cost only a little more perform far better, so they'd look elsewhere.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great shoe and still one of the best, either as an all-rounder for all your running or a speedy rotation shoe, especially for those who don't love max cushion. The upper is tweaked and the outsole improved, but the ride is much the same, so while v6 is on sale it's the better value.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
A lot like v6, in the best way: just a little cosmetic sprucing and another year of fun running in the line. The line is aging like fine wine, and one tester thinks the real deal-breaker will just be aesthetics.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger, Peter Stuart & Maya Kahana · 2 days ago
A no-nonsense, jack-of-all-trades tempo daily trainer: springy, fast and fun as the line should be, with no more durability concerns and great tongue and upper construction.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Dominique Winebaum & Michael Ellenberger · 2 days ago
One tester enjoys it more than the Ghost 15: DNA Loft v3 is softer and lighter without being mushy, the extra 3 mm of forefoot foam is more pleasant, and the geometry gives a stable, energetic ride. It's still a high-drop shoe (she'd prefer ~5 mm) and slightly heavier than its predecessor.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Chad Zimmermann & Renaldo Robinson · 2 days ago
As reliable daily trainers go, you can't do much better at $150, and it continues Brooks' long line of durability, with 36 mm stack closing the gap to the Ghost Max. But it's so close to the Ghost 16, which is 'boring' in a reliable way, that buying the 16 on sale may make more sense.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Bach · 2 days ago
One of the best Ghost midsoles yet: more versatile, so you can cruise or push the pace fairly well, a jack of all trades. It has a mildly stable platform and excellent lockdown that's slightly snug, with wide options. It's at the top end of daily-trainer pricing.
Blog · The Size 15 Runner · 2 days ago
His first Ghost in over a decade, and the 'friendliest' yet: more DNA Loft v3 foam and a lower drop make for a surprisingly efficient, enjoyable ride at a good price. If you haven't tried the Ghost in a while, there's never been a better time. The upper fits tight.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
Testers loved the balanced, supportive cushioning and smooth landing-to-push-off transition, and one said she 'loved the shoes like no other.' The soft upper is breathable, never too hot, and there are four widths. The midsole is firmer than some wanted, and some testers found the toe box slightly narrow.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Ali Ball · 2 days ago
Stylish, comfortable and versatile, possibly one of the best shoes of the year: gentle on tired legs yet responsive when the pace rises. The Speedboard rolls you forward on soft double CloudTec landings, and it shines on long steady runs. Stones no longer get stuck in the Clouds, and it's cemented a place in their rotation.
Blog · Treeline Review – Becca Downs · 2 days ago
A people-pleasing, do-it-all trainer and the most versatile On she's tested: plush, forward-rolling cushioning, breathable mesh and no durability issues after 30+ hours. It doesn't excel at anything specific and has less propulsion than the Cloudmonster, which is hard to justify at $180.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Jane McGuire · 2 days ago
A plush, stable cushioned cruiser that keeps tired legs fresh. Unlike On shoes she's found too firm for her stompy stride, she loved it for easy miles, long runs in a marathon block and everyday wear, with toe-box room in her normal size. Lockdown took tweaking, faster sessions felt like hard work, and it's pricey.
Blog · Kobasuke no Nikki – Kobasuke · 2 days ago
Brooks' superb fit, a shoe that goes slow or fast as you choose, decent ground feel and no carbon plate. Speed came easily in races and fartleks. It's more cushioned than his old Hyperion Tempo, so his soles suffered less late in a marathon. He ran a 100 km ultra in 10:49 (a PB by over an hour) without instability or blisters.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
He expected little given the big weight gain, but it's faster: top-level speed among non-plated shoes, with quick response, much more rebound and a 37 mm rocker that pushes you forward. It can hit 60 s/400 m pace yet works as a daily trainer. The heel hold is firm, so consider half a size up for daily use.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
A more democratic ride that should compete fiercely with versatile daily trainers: more cushioning underfoot and an extremely comfortable upper with a divine tongue and collar. He'd take it on medium-long runs without thinking. The layered upper runs warm and the toe box is narrow.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
The changes fundamentally shift its use: less fast than before but more comfortable underfoot. Light, versatile and breathable, soft at slow paces and responsive when going faster, it handles long runs up to ~15 miles. Speedwork ability is limited, the fit slightly snug, and it's a bit wobbly in turns.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Olivia Yoder · 2 days ago
A well-made, lightweight shoe ideal for smooth running that doesn't cost you speed, whether training or racing a triathlon. Breathable, easy on and off, with unique colours, and she loved it. The outsole is slippery on wet surfaces and the tongue rides up a little.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Alexander Walker · 2 days ago
Another tester grew to love the bold Van Gogh-style design, the contouring minimalist tongue and the subtly stabilising heel counter. One tester found it sluggish and stopped having fun, so he sees it better for light 2–6 mile easy days.
Blog · Runner's World · 2 days ago
A mile eater for easy days and weekly mileage, with a spacious toe box that wide-footed runners revel in on long, swollen-foot days and a soft, padded upper. An ideal introduction to zero drop. Not much bounce, and some testers felt the toe box rubbed their pinky toe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
The toe box is a big, classic-Altra improvement on v7. But the stiff platform feels unnatural for zero drop and needs an earlier rocker, so the ride felt stiff and unforgiving. The prominent medial sidewall caused arch pain during and after every run. Heavy for its 30 mm stack.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Kurt Biesemans · 2 days ago
A comfortable zero-drop daily trainer with a great, secure fit, solid traction and better durability (should last ~500 mi). He isn't convinced by long runs: it's firm and lacks cushioning at slower paces, but works well at faster tempos, so it joins his rotation for shorter, quicker runs.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
It runs like every other in the line, a flexible, low-stack zero-drop trainer with lots of ground feel. But the huge fit change to a low-volume, narrow toe box caused toe discomfort that limited her runs. Good only for narrow, low-volume feet, and exposed midsole wear showed at 20 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – John Calabrese · 2 days ago
The gold standard of Altra road shoes: a light, flexible zero-drop shoe that brought back fond memories. Another tester says it remains the healthiest shoe for keeping a light, flexible stride and finishing a marathon injury-free, though they'd like a bit more cushioning late in the race.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
An excellent choice for zero-drop fans who want lots of ground feel: a near-perfect fit, a natural feel and great breathability, and one of the most comfortable options for daily wear and the gym. Cushioning is poor, the use is niche, it's not ideal for high mileage, and outsole wear is a common complaint.
Blog · Road Trail Run – John Tribbia & Ben David · 2 days ago
Lighter (13 g less than v18) on a broader platform, with a breathable upper, some light trail and gravel ability thanks to the outsole, and great value at $140. It's a daily trainer, not a speedster: there's no real 'wow' factor, and one tester wanted more stack.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Caryn Just & Renaldo Robinson · 2 days ago
The supercritical PWRRUN+ midsole is where it shines, with an upper that feels like a $160–170 trainer. Long-time Ride fans won't need to change, and newcomers get a reliable daily trainer that doesn't break the bank. It can run a little big, making it feel slightly cloggy despite the low weight.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A good-value neutral daily trainer with a steady rocker and softer PWRRUN+ that's dialled in for easy days. Lockdown and traction are good, and it didn't run hot over 16 miles. It loses some of the speedy versatility of earlier versions, and the volume is a touch low through the mid/forefoot.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
Small tweaks that all feel like welcome upgrades: comfortable for miles and not overdone, with an improved outsole that fixes the Ride 18's durability blow-back. She says go for the 19 over a discounted 18. Holes in the mesh let in rocks and dirt, and wide sizes come in few colourways.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Lindsay Agro & Alexander Walker · 2 days ago
For another tester, who fell in love with the 15, this update is a total miss. One tester finds it devoid of personality, a copy of a copy, though he did find the FF Blast Plus fun and responsive.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Ben David & Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
A light, lively, colourful daily trainer for summer miles at almost any pace, with a beautifully fitting upper and a fun ride that rolls with your pace. Great value at $135 and very durable. One tester wished for FF Turbo foam, and another tester wanted a touch more stack.
Blog · WearTesters – Annie Keris & Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
Light, versatile, fun and breathable, with great grip and solid lockdown from the upper, a dependable trainer, especially if you're not a big runner. It has lost some of the eccentric character behind this shoe cult following. The ride geometry may not suit overpronators, and there are no bungee laces.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
A neutral workhorse daily trainer for runners who don't mind extra weight (11.2 oz). It's protective and durable but firm underfoot thanks to the extra Bounce. It's aimed at beginners and suits those sensitive to rockers. It runs long, the forefoot can be a little slappy, and he'd refine the heel collar.
Blog · Jimuin-san's Running Blog – Tanishin · 2 days ago
Chose it as a light (216 g, wide 27.0) non-carbon marathon shoe. He felt no shoe weight late in the race, no sole-of-foot pain (unlike carbon shoes) and no cramps. It is a good race option for sub-4 or sub-3.5 runners.
Blog · Jintan's Blog – Jinkei · 2 days ago
At 400 km the ride, cushion, upper and midsole are all fine. But the outsole rubber was clearly worn by 200 km, and by 400 km the heel grooves were gone and it was very slippery on wet roads. He expects ~500 km of life and won't buy it again.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown (DPT) · 2 days ago
Rated A-: a value do-it-all shoe with solid stability design elements. The ride is muted but gives some ground feel. It has a traditional HOKA fit (moderate-wide heel, snugger mid and forefoot). Personal grade B+: the drop is a bit low to use all the time.
Blog · WeeViews – Michael Young · 2 days ago
Super light for its max cushion, with classic pop for double-digit long runs. It is breathable and sheds water, and the laces lock tight. At 70 mi the outsole is already badly worn and he doubts it will reach 300 mi. The tongue is very thin.
Blog · GearJunkie – M.T. Elliott · 2 days ago
A softer midsole fixes v1's overly firm ride: zero-drop with real max cushion. It is peppy enough for pick-ups, and the fit stayed secure. After 100 mi there are only minor midsole cracks and the outsole is in good shape. The grooves pick up rocks, and it is still firmer than other max shoes.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 2 days ago
Rated A-. It does exactly what it is advertised to do: smooth transitions and a balanced, cushioned, comfortable ride. Neutral, but with heel sidewalls and a wide base. The upper is extremely comfortable for easy efforts, though wear socks because of some internal stitching.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
Less exciting than v1 but a good shoe. The new two-layer Helion fixes v1's instability on landing at the cost of a firmer feel, so don't expect the soft cushion of the original. It is pricey.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Michael Sawh · 2 days ago
'More like a step backward.' The extra cushioning is comfortable and protective, but the added weight makes it less versatile than v1. The upper fits well and accommodates longer runs, and the ride is stable and smooth. It feels like a firmer big-cushion shoe that walks well.
Blog · Shuichi Running – Shuichi Hibino · 2 days ago
'Heavier but more stable': marginally firmer, more stable and shifted towards slow jogging. Propulsion is slightly reduced, and the extra weight makes moderate efforts feel less natural. It runs large and wide, so he went a half size down. Outsole durability looks unchanged from v1.
Blog · Marathon Handbook – Alex Cyr · 2 days ago
A workout shoe disguised as a recovery sneaker: Helion foam and a plate give more pop than an easy-run shoe, with tons of support and a long lifespan. At 10.4 oz it is heavy, and it is tall and wide.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger · 2 days ago
The upper is comfortable and secure, and the natural foot shape works well, but that comfort is betrayed by the midsole. It is not the soft, bouncy ride you'd expect from a 'max' shoe; it is too firm.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Alex, Tim · 2 days ago
'Long and easy but not more than that.' Stiff and heavy (310 g), but the balanced cushioning, rocker and foot shape made easy runs enjoyable. The pair ran short. Note: Altra sponsored a video on their YouTube channel; the article itself is not sponsored.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
The wide toe box was extremely comfortable on runs over seven miles. Uphills felt cumbersome at first, then almost effortless. It proved durable, with excellent grip and good breathability, though it may be too wide for narrow feet.
Blog · T3 – Kieran Alger · 2 days ago
'Looks deceive.' Despite the big-stack styling, the ride is very firm, dense and rocker-driven rather than soft and bouncy. It feels heavy and clunky for a do-it-all trainer. The upper is comfortable, and fans of firm shoes like the Adistar may get on with it.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Brady Burman-Magday, Sam Edgin, Austin Bonds · 2 days ago
One tester calls it, with the Vanish Tempo, his favourite Altra road shoe. It is comfortable and smooth, and at 8.15 oz it is an easy recommendation for a wide-toe-box daily trainer.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown (DPT) · 2 days ago
A nimble, versatile 4 mm daily trainer with a soft but not too soft foam. He has no inherent design complaints. He would like a little more flex between midfoot and forefoot.
Blog · Canadian Running – Keeley Milne · 2 days ago
Became her go-to for everyday mileage. It is light and responsive, and the smooth rocker works for recovery jogs and progression runs. The EGO PWR foam adds gentle bounce, and the fit is classic Altra: roomy toes, locked heel.
Blog · Runner's World – Catherine Crowley · 2 days ago
A marathoner who usually runs in high-drop stability shoes. The wide toe box ended her usual post-run foot soreness, the foam felt soft and responsive on hills, and the upper stayed cool in summer heat. It became her go-to shoe.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Larry Lam · 2 days ago
A good, stable, well-built daily trainer for beginner to intermediate runners. It isn't soft enough for a high-stack shoe, the toe box is tight, and $170 is more than it should cost.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
A max-cushioned daily trainer that doesn't veer into overly plush. It feels stable and durable for long runs and heavier runners. The thick padding makes it less breathable, and it lacks pop for picking up the pace.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
Personal grade A-. It returns to what he loved about versions 20 and 21: lighter and more responsive, with a true superfoam feel and a secure fit. The toe box is slightly narrow, and after only 30 mi he is already wearing through the exposed foam.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 6.5. Generous but not excessive cushioning makes it a reliable shoe for slow and easy runs. It lacks reactivity once the pace picks up.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
95%. Still one of their go-tos despite lacking bells and whistles: a durable, really comfortable shoe that checks all their boxes, especially at its price.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A solid, versatile daily trainer with a better-fitting, quality upper, a smooth collar lining, excellent heel lockdown and a true-to-size, accommodating fit. Lighter than before. Not a big upgrade over the Ride 17, and there's no forefoot rocker.
Blog · Harlerunner – Thomas · 2 days ago
'Perfect all-rounder', 5/5: a safe bet for nearly every session, from an easy half-marathon long run to hill intervals. Good fit, weight and cushioning, and a bit more padding. Barely different from the Ride 17, so a cheap v17 is a fine alternative. Firmly in his rotation.
Blog · Daily Running Co. – Dean · 2 days ago
A stable, protective, comfortable workhorse: the upper is pristine, and the PWRRUN+ foam has moulded to his stride, with surprising rebound when picking up the pace. Not agile or nimble. The exposed midsole foam shows wear in the forefoot and lateral heel, which could shorten its life.
Blog · Run & Smile – Roman · 2 days ago
A modern do-it-all trainer: true to size, comfy fit, sticky grip even on wet roads and light trail, no visible wear at 100 km. Firm at first but softened. Best from easy to half/marathon pace; too firm for recovery and not for the track. Laces too stretchy.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
A balanced ride that prioritizes stability and control, with decent elastic response at push-off. The upper is heavily revised (7.5): engineered fabric replaces the more 'plasticky' feel of the past for a softer, more natural fit.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Courtney Kelly · 2 days ago
A very plush upper and pricing on par with competitors. The ride is firm, and it's heavier than rivals.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 2 days ago
A-/A-. One tester: a slightly firmer but responsive rockered ride that works for long, easy and uptempo runs, with a stable-neutral A for stability thanks to high sidewalls. Great, surprisingly breathable upper with no heel rubbing. Firmer than the stack suggests, and the tongue is thin.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
87%. A big leap over the original: a max-stack shoe that keeps its form, so legs feel good with little energy lost to the foam. Decent bounce, a roomy but secure fit and a breathable upper. High stack and slightly firm, weak at tempo/threshold, lacks forefoot pop, pricey.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Brooks' only lightweight daily model, with moderate cushioning, a nice bounce and the familiar Ghost fit, at the same price as the Ghost 18. Underwhelming as a tempo-up shoe.
Blog · Canadian Running – Hayden West · 2 days ago
Well done, Brooks: DNA HYPE foam plus the new rocker give a supportive, responsive and secure ride. Comfortable and capable on easy runs and faster efforts alike, it quickly earned a place in his regular rotation.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A good daily trainer and his pick of the Brooks lineup (he'd buy it over the Ghost 18) unless you want max cushion. In this competitive category, though, he'd buy the bouncier Novablast 6 or the lighter Deviate Pure Nitro first.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
B+. The bouncier midsole holds up well across paces, it's durable and the fit is secure. Stiff initially and needs a break-in, fits short with a tapered toe box, firmer than expected, and the heel tab curves in.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger, Courtney Kelly, Jen Schmidt · 2 days ago
Scores 9.6/9.3/8.35. One tester: 'my kind of shoe', a big leap over traditional Brooks trainers. Easy runs are comfortable, steady runs natural, and it responds to strides. A potential workhorse. Several testers would prefer 8 mm over 6 mm drop, and it's not a dedicated long-run cruiser.
Blog · Run Lab – Rukku · 2 days ago
Recommended for runners who value a balance of shock absorption and stability, and for relaxed-pace long runs. But at the same price the FuelCell Rebel v5 beats it for both performance and lightness.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Much-improved cushioning that is soft but not too soft, with a strong heel hold. Specialized for gentle easy-pace running. Propulsion is restrained, it feels a bit heavy (the high collar transmits the weight when lifting the foot), and the price rose ¥2,200.
Blog · RunActu – Yoann · 2 days ago
Versatility regained: perfect for a runner who wants one pair, from 45-minute jogs to 90-minute runs with pace blocks, with dynamism that doesn't cost comfort. The outsole and upper still look new after 100 km. Slightly heavy for very short track intervals.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Matt Kolat · 2 days ago
Score 8.65. A comfortable, dependable daily trainer that feels lighter than its weight suggests. Still relatively heavy for its cushioning level, and completely neutral despite the broad platform, so not for runners with any stability needs.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
A noticeable update: lighter and fresher, with a lighter, breathable Primeweave upper and room for her toes this time. The wide base adds stability, and the outsole doesn't look like it will wear down fast. It runs big (go half a size down), the laces are very short, and it can feel bulky.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
A-. A pleasant surprise that 'rights the ship' of this shoe line: lighter, more stable and more durable than v2. Balanced cushioning and a stable neutral ride for consistent daily miles. Cons: short laces, very low forefoot volume and a slight posterior heel flare.
Blog · Esco a Correre – Simone · 2 days ago
It surprises again: the perfect single shoe for runners up to the half marathon, at its best for easy 8-10 km runs, with a responsive midsole for some pickups. He wouldn't use it for marathon long runs, especially if you weigh over 75 kg.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Score 7. Very 'democratic': no extreme strengths or obvious flaws. It suits newer runners who need one trainer for slow runs through workouts. The new ReactX doesn't change the familiar feel. Wear after 150 km only at his usual spots, with 600-700 km expected for runners up to ~75 kg.
Blog · Shishiga Blog · 2 days ago
A versatile jogging shoe that also handles race pace in build-up runs. Light-feeling despite its weight, breathable, with a durable-looking outsole. Replacing his 900 km Ghost 15, he was very satisfied and recommends it to anyone stuck choosing a jog shoe.
Blog · Negibozu's running diary · 2 days ago
His main training shoe: ReactX cushion and rebound make running fun, and at nearly 400 km it is still going strong with only some sole wear. The downside: runners who dislike soft, squishy modern foam should try it first.
Blog · Papiran · 2 days ago
His 'partner' for a sub-4: jogs, 5:40/km pace runs, 20 km runs and a 3-hour LSD, ending in a 3:57 at the Kumamoto Castle Marathon. Soft but propulsive and stable when legs tire. Light enough for the first 100 km of use, but he raced in the EVO SL.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks · 2 days ago
A classic that holds steady: still feels good after 300 miles thanks to its durable build, and is a reliable daily trainer if you liked the 40. Few changes, so don't expect the older feel of the line. Narrow like most Nikes, with no wide option noted.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Alice Barraclough · 2 days ago
Seriously comfy and stylish, with a sock-like Primeknit fit and solid lockdown, and 30% lighter than v22. Still relatively heavy, so they found it best for easy, relaxed runs rather than anything fast.
Blog · Irontwit – John Sutton · 2 days ago
His 'strong and stable' main shoe. Despite past Achilles issues he had no injuries in the 10 mm drop. The upper hasn't sagged, the midsole is still springy at 800 miles, and the Continental outsole grips on gravel towpaths. Heel wear only. The knit upper runs warm.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Joost de Raeymaeker · 2 days ago
Soft, light and surprisingly versatile. It handled easy jogs, hill repeats and pickups, the upper breathed in midday heat, and long runs left him fresh. Scores 9-9.5 across ride, fit, durability and value. A plateless shoe that earns a permanent rotation spot.
Blog · The Running Club – Matteo Rocca · 2 days ago
Score 7.2. Light, comfortable and fluid for moderate paces (4:30-5:30/km) and long runs, but softer than v4. Stability drops below ~4:15/km and in quick turns. Best for runners under 80 kg. Normal wear at 150 km, estimated 500-600 km life.
Blog · Runnea UK – Gorka Cabañas · 2 days ago
9.5/10. The most complete Rebel yet: comfortable at 5:15/km, livelier at 4:30 and still keeping up at 3:45. Below 3:30/km you feel the lack of a plate. Very light, fun and suits more runners than ever. Not the fastest or most durable.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Tim Harrison · 2 days ago
Light, versatile and fun, with more cushion than v4. The bounce lasted to nearly 80 miles (v4 faded at about half that). The midsole is heavily creased, but the outsole is bulletproof and wet grip is fine. Probably not a 500-mile shoe, but still good value.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 3 days ago
A daily trainer 'with an extra gear'. For runners under ~70 kg the firmer midsole adds responsiveness; for heavier runners Fresh Foam X is a nice balance of softness and pop.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+/A- (personal A-): despite a stiffer heel counter and slightly tapered toe box, the ride and fit have been excellent for mileage and all-day wear.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
'A real surprise': like a trimmed-down SC Trainer, quality at a low price that one tester recommends to beginners and seasoned marathoners alike.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
A well-cushioned budget trainer that's great at easy-to-moderate paces, and an inexpensive way to try a plated shoe. Not the best shoe in their test, but a great partner for specific users.
Blog · Runner’s World · 3 days ago
Cushioning that isn't too soft or slow; testers could still crank out fast miles, and generous rubber has impressed on durability. The forefoot felt thin past 12 miles for one tester. Not a first choice for speedwork.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
B+/A-: he loves the upper, but the midfoot isn't stable enough for him to get the most out of the shoe. Durability is fair over 35 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger, Caryn Just · 3 days ago
One tester kept lacing it up day after day: a max-cushion trainer that looks and feels great, and it stays in her rotation. A winner with a fun, forgiving ride.
Blog · Treeline Review – Becca Downs · 3 days ago
After a year of testing they call it the best road shoe you can get right now: balanced max cushion with a responsive midsole, comfortable and versatile from daily runs and workouts to long runs and light trails. Pricey at $180.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
A polished first-gen trainer: if he could pick only one On training shoe, it'd be this. It blocks ground feel completely and his legs recover faster. More cushion than the Cloudsurfer.
Blog · Daily Running Co. – Dean · 3 days ago
Durable and well-made: the upper shows zero wear and is among the most comfortable they've tested, and the outsole barely wore. The foam lost some plushness, and for this mid/forefoot striker the geometry now feels clunky. Best for heel strikers up to the half marathon.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Solid and good value, but he 'wouldn't pick it up' for his own rotation. There are better options for whatever you want, like the Evo SL at a similar price, which is more comfortable and more responsive. It may suit fans of high-drop trainers with more ground feel.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+/A-. One tester: a solid, durable neutral trainer with firmer, more responsive Dreamstrike+ foam and great value at $140. Another tester likes the midsole feel, but the toe spring and stiff midfoot didn't fit her foot (B-). It's clunky until broken in at ~20-30 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray · 3 days ago
'Accidentally ordered decaf' (performance C). The upper and fit are near the top of the category, but one tester can't get past the boxy feel, and you can get the same ride or better elsewhere. The rigid, blocky midsole doesn't feel 'super'. Fine if you love On and have the budget.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Ali Ball · 3 days ago
Comfortable, forgiving and stable for easy and longer miles, but not speedy, and v2 does the same for £40 less. She'd pick the Hoka Skyward X any day. It needs a stiffer forefoot and a peppier ride.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
'Not worth the hype': it's easy to find shoes that offer more for less, like the Superblast. The Endorphin Speed 4, Hoka Mach 6 and Rebel v4 are more enjoyable and much cheaper.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jessica Downey · 3 days ago
She genuinely enjoyed it for slow, steady miles and loves the look. But it doesn't feel dramatically different from other big-cushion trainers and doesn't live up to the 'Hyper' name for speed or lightness. Better value exists if price matters.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+ and A-. One tester's favorite super trainer, a 'training mileage monster' with a rhythmic, bouncy forefoot. Another likes its durability and centered stability but finds it firm for the category, with a slightly long fit. $220 is steep.
Blog · Biegowy Wariat · 3 days ago
Worth its 1,000+ zł price: fun on fast sections, versatile for training and racing, and it leaves legs fresh for the next session. No foam degradation after 300 km. He recommends it 100%.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Karl Fernandez · 3 days ago
One tester 14/15, another tester 12/15. A highly versatile daily trainer with a better upper than the Evo SL, a ride more stable and bouncy than the Novablast 5, and better durability than the Rebel v5. Nothing comes close at $140. It runs narrow and takes a while to break in.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B to B+ overall: a no-frills, durable mileage trainer at a fair $140. One tester liked the fit and wider forefoot, but its 10 mm drop and clunky heel keep it off her easy-run lineup. Another tester felt a medial bias from the narrow platform and the foam compressed a little by 30 miles.
Blog · Weeviews – Scott Hilton · 3 days ago
'FUN' in one word, and highly recommended for short-to-mid workouts, track work and fun runs. The midfoot and toe box are narrow, so try before buying if you have high-volume feet. The high-wear area is already wearing at 65 mi; he projects ~300 mi.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
'An instant favorite' and a big upgrade on v3: great value and a high performer that will suit many runners perfectly. He'll be recommending it widely. His only advice is to wait for Puma's frequent sales.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
9.5/10. A versatile daily trainer with comfort and durability that make it easily worth the money, and it performed well even for a larger runner. The outsole looks built to last. Not a great option for wide feet.
Blog · Akiaki blog – akiaki · 3 days ago
After 1,000 km: no quirks, easy to use for everything from jogs to pace runs, and strong value on sale. Cushioning has clearly dropped, the outsole is worn on the outer edge and the upper is starting to tear. Now a backup shoe, but he would wear it again.
Blog · Runshu – Shuichi Hibino · 3 days ago
Durability is 'poor, critically so for a daily trainer'. The midsole was heavily creased and the cushioning gone by 400 km, the upper holed at ~300 km, and the shoe felt tilted. It also rides firm and heavy. He retired it and never bought a second pair.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
Grades mostly B to C. One tester found the ZoomX only moderately responsive, with a clunky heel and lugs worn by 30 miles. Another tester got burning hot spots from the high-volume upper on every run and won't run in it again.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Robbe Reddinger · 3 days ago
One tester wants to love it but craves more forefoot cushion, and he'd take the NB Rebel v4 instead. It works under 10 miles but isn't his pick for 16-20 milers. Nike made 'a great shoe for 2020, not a great shoe for now'.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nike's most versatile trainer and the overdue successor to the Pegasus Turbo, enjoyable for many kinds of runs. The rubber looks durable after 40 miles.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Michael Ellenberger · 3 days ago
Perhaps the best do-it-all or one-shoe travel option. It handled a hard 19-miler with near super-shoe spring late in the run, and progression tempos. No outsole or midsole wear after 100 miles, and the upper is getting more comfortable.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Tim, Ivan · 3 days ago
Both love the soft, smooth ride and the comfortable, breathable upper. It won't enter his rotation because it is too unstable for him, though he calls it a huge step forward for On.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Jenny Bozon · 3 days ago
Best in Test: soft but not mushy, light (213g) and snappy, and she reaches for it for track speedwork as well as long runs. The padded heel is kind to her Achilles. No outsole wear after 70+ km.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Nathan (DPTs) · 3 days ago
One tester (A- overall) found it a light 8.6 oz daily trainer that moves into uptempo work well. Another tester found it soft and hard to pick up the pace in. Mild instability from the softness and flexibility kept one tester off longer runs. The outsole was intact at 35 miles.
Blog · Weeviews – Michael Young · 3 days ago
A big redo over the v12: a new upper that no longer loosens, slightly better rain grip, and very little wear at ~80 miles. The upper runs a little hot.
Blog · Men’s Fitness UK – Kieran Alger + Steve Wright · 3 days ago
Super-plush, protective comfort for easy and recovery miles. Kieran found it less lively and versatile than the v12. Steve says it's still his favourite trainer after 400 miles, with no upper splitting and good tread.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
A lively, stable, well-cushioned do-it-all trainer, and the new rubber outsole fixes the durability problems of v4/v5. One tester found it snug and narrow, and another tester's toe box felt baggy.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it a comfortable, light and versatile daily trainer with enough pop for fast finishes. It runs narrow, is less bouncy than the Rebel v4 and lacks the propulsion of a plate for long speed work.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
One of Hoka's best geometries: bouncy EVA and a smooth rocker that work from easy to fast. The fit is snug and tapered (go up a half size), laces dig in late in long runs, and one tester saw fast heel wear.
Blog · Treeline Review · 3 days ago
Light, responsive and great for speed work, almost like a cushioned racing flat. One tester was comfortable on long runs. Another tester (hip arthritis) found the cushion too thin past 2-3 miles, and the exposed foam is a durability worry.
Blog · Stefan läuft – Stefan · 3 days ago
Stefan calls it his favorite road shoe, versatile from roughly 6:00/km long runs to 3:50/km intervals, with no blisters and still not “done” at 1,000 km. It is less comfortable than a Clifton and somewhat slippery on wet or icy ground.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas · 3 days ago
Thomas calls it an excellent, durable multi-use trainer at $120. The Lightstrike Pro puck sits under the ball of the foot; the materials are entry-level, the outsole rubber is ordinary, and the fit is not for wide feet.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
A fun, simple lightweight trainer and workout shoe: firmer but snappy, great for tempos and intervals, and durable. The tongue slides, heel lockdown is so-so, and one tester couldn't feel the Lightstrike Pro.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry calls it “good, but not great”: acceptable for short runs, but firm, dull and hard to enjoy beyond 10K, without punch when he held faster paces. He preferred rivals such as the Velocity Nitro, Mach 5 and Rebel v3.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Split verdict. One tester (8.95) and another tester (8.6) see a classic, durable do-it-all trainer with a great upper and outsole. A third tester (5/10) found it flat, lumpy and uninspiring, with a bruised forefoot on longer runs.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe, Thomas · 3 days ago
Robbe and Thomas call it a blue-collar workhorse daily trainer, with a secure upper, softer React than v38 and excellent grip. They note a narrow toe box, less pop from the forefoot Zoom unit and dull colorways.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown, Bach Pham · 3 days ago
A versatile, reliable neutral trainer with a more stable heel than v37/38. Both found it narrow with a low-volume toe box, and one tester had to lace-lock it. Overall A-.
Blog · Hebereke no Hashiru Sekai – hebereke555 · 3 days ago
Hebereke reports exceptional durability: at 2,000 km the upper has only small splits and most outsole rubber remains intact. The midsole is tired, but the Air units still cushion, making it a strong value.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
Nathaniel Bailey found it firm-ish but peppy and very versatile, with standout wet traction and great value. The midfoot is narrow, stability is limited, and the thin laces are hard to untie.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas, Robbe · 3 days ago
A sleeper hit: the full-length Lightstrike Pro gives a smooth, snappy ride at $130. It runs narrow, one tester got a hot spot near his big toe, and there is no support for pronators.
Blog · Running Scientist – Runshu · 3 days ago
Runshu describes a durable, versatile daily trainer with excellent wet grip. He retired it at 910 km after it began tilting laterally. The midfoot is slightly loose, and the laces come undone easily.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Near-unanimous praise as the best do-it-all unplated trainer, with the wider platform adding stability. One tester misses the flex and ground feel of v2/v3, another tester finds wet-road grip a bit weak, and a third tester found it slightly loose on narrow feet.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas, Meaghan, Ryan · 3 days ago
Light, cushioned enough for double-digit runs, and fun on back-to-back days. One tester had to cinch the roomy throat for his narrow foot, called the tongue cheap, and raised midsole-durability concerns. Another tester needed a break-in period.
Blog · biglongrun – Drew · 3 days ago
In a multi-shoe history post, Drew rated it 6/10: as his weight increased, the midsole bottomed out, so he retired it early. The fit was borderline loose, offering a useful perspective from a heavier runner.
Blog · A Mile. A Minute. – Anthony Chevalier · 3 days ago
Anthony Chevalier names it his shoe of the year: light, bouncy and fun at any pace.
Blog · Six Minute Mile – Brian Metzler · 3 days ago
Brian Metzler calls it a do-everything trainer for easy, long and up-tempo days. It feels very roomy on narrow feet and may not be a high-mileage workhorse.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it a light, fun and versatile unplated trainer that handled track sessions and a 15-miler equally well, with good wet grip. Narrow-footed runners may find the fit loose.
RunningRecs · Dave M · 6 days ago
Got these to replace my old running shoes that were pretty much falling apart. Felt comfortable right from the first run, didn't even need to break them in. No blisters or heel rubbing so far, which is always a plus. Cushioning is nice and soft but not overly squishy. I mostly use them for easy runs around the neighborhood and they've been great for that.
RunningRecs · Carmen · 6 days ago
I tried taking these on longer runs and honestly, didn't really work for me. Up to 10k they're great, feel light and fast and the upper is really comfortable. But once I got past 15k my feet started hurting. Just not enough cushioning for that kind of distance, at least for me. The outsole is wearing down pretty quickly too, especially under the forefoot. I still like them for shorter, faster runs but I use something more cushioned for my long runs now.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 8 days ago
They call the Pegasus a reliable platform for dumping miles, with a pair of 39s showing only minor wear after hundreds of miles.
RunningRecs · Kasia W. · 11 days ago
Bought these in 2E for easy days and my long Sunday run. Fit is the best thing about them. Roomy toe box, soft knit, the tongue stays put, no blisters even past 25 km. The ride is a different story. Soft enough when you step in, but not much comes back, and on frosty mornings the foam goes noticeably harder for the first few km. In July my feet cooked a bit in the knit.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
A wide-footed runner finds Altra awesome and currently runs roads in the Escalante 4.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 24 days ago
With a EEE-wide foot, finds the Rebel v4 fits very well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 24 days ago
Retired after 1,100 km with some sole wear.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
A mixed bag: lovely soft, resilient foam, but a heavier upper and a long, narrow fit even in wide.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 28 days ago
One tester logged about 20 miles over four runs, including an all-out 5K, and another about 60 km of easy, steady and long runs. One found a comfortable, stable, lively-enough ride with a durable-looking outsole but little bounce at 5K pace; another found it firmer than average, a little thin under the forefoot and short on punch when pushing the pace. They see a dependable daily trainer rather than a standout.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 31 days ago
Started falling apart around 400 km.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 32 days ago
Moved to the zero-drop Torin 9 and found the transition smooth, with their stride shifting naturally to midfoot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 36 days ago
Disliked them for running; now only walks in them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Enjoyed the Triumph 23 and found it a good, steady shoe for their long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 37 days ago
Liked them a lot on first acquaintance.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 42 days ago
Loving them on the roads, though wants a trail option.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 50 days ago
Great feel, soft and comfortable without being too cushy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 52 days ago
Wonderful for easy runs: great cushioning and stable enough at 200 lb.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 56 days ago
15 miles in: a firmer-side super trainer, better than the Boston 12; strongly recommended.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Their current favourite, but they don't last long.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 59 days ago
Great for speed but a bit firm and less comfortable for long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 75 days ago
About 600 km; heel rubber worn but the foam still feels new.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 77 days ago
100 km in: very soft and plush, with a great upper, more fun and more stable than the Superblast 3.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 79 days ago
Great fit and comfort but stuck in the slow lane; their old Triumph 20 runs circles around it.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes · 81 days ago
Calls it their favourite Nike and the best Pegasus so far, still in great shape and would buy again.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 83 days ago
Despises them; every run feels harder, like running in sand.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 84 days ago
Two weeks in: lightweight and good for tempo and speed, though hard to run slowly in.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 85 days ago
Especially underwhelming for them; wanted better foam for $145.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 86 days ago
Held up well and was good for 650 km of running.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 89 days ago
Loves them; they make the Vomero Plus feel harsh and overbuilt.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 89 days ago
Two runs: fun even on tired legs, no bottoming out at 95 kg.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 90 days ago
32 km in: plush, soft and light with great impact protection, stable for its softness and a roomier upper than the MagMax Nitro 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 90 days ago
Surprisingly stable for such a soft midsole, with a great upper; perfect for easy days.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 90 days ago
Good shock absorption but bottoms out at the forefoot for a heavier runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 97 days ago
Possibly their favourite daily trainer ever; would only change the upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 97 days ago
First Puma: right cushioning and great energy return; bought a second pair after 40 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 100 days ago
Loves them and can't throw them out even though they're thrashed.
YouTube · Yowana · 101 days ago
One run of roughly six miles. They found it fine but unexciting: a decently balanced, smooth ride with good cushion that feels taller than its stack and a comfortable padded upper, but neither soft nor especially peppy, and heavier than expected. They would not run workouts in it and see a solid, middle-of-the-road daily trainer for a one-shoe rotation or a first half marathon.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 103 days ago
Enjoyed it, but after 100 km it became too soft for speed work and only suits easy runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 105 days ago
250 miles in: amazing cushion for daily runs and among the most durable shoes they've worn; the elastic tongue is the one issue.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 107 days ago
First run: Brooks finally got it right.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 112 days ago
Softer and smaller than the Megablast, but bottomed out around 30 km at 85 kg.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 112 days ago
Loving them after tempo runs and a relay; good energy return and ground feel.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 113 days ago
5-mile first run: comfortable performance fit, soft and springy DNA Hype foam with forefoot pop; fun from easy to tempo.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 113 days ago
A month in: a nice surprise with a very comfortable fit; wishes the upper were thinner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 115 days ago
Feels a lot clunkier than the Triumph 21 they loved.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes · 118 days ago
After only 400 km the foam started to degrade and their feet hurt on some runs, but otherwise rates the shoe highly.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
The Rebel v4 had zero bounce by 200 km and by 350 km gave them ankle and knee pain, the first shoe they've abandoned before 600 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
Their Rebel v4 barely made it to 150 miles; after another 50 they got ankle and arch pain even at very easy paces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
Finds the Rebel v4 classic, flat, minimal and light, best for hill work or very easy short runs that reward a forefoot stride.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
Likes the Rebel v5 as a more modern cushioned daily trainer that is still snappy, using it for 10-plus-mile runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 119 days ago
A versatile, light daily for easy miles, long runs and short fartleks.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 125 days ago
After two runs and 25 km they feel great.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 126 days ago
Okay but not exciting; prefers the EVO SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 127 days ago
Nicknamed the Rebel v4 Captain Slow for how slow it felt.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 128 days ago
A surprisingly nice shoe with a stable-with-pep feel; good for newer runners wanting something faster at the regular Ghost price.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 129 days ago
A runner calls the Pegasus Plus one of their favourite Nike shoes ever.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 133 days ago
Loved the first pair so much they bought a second, though the second colourway's foam feels much stiffer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 135 days ago
Had cramped toes until swapping in a thinner insole.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 136 days ago
Liked it but it was too unstable for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 139 days ago
Got the wide version and can surprisingly go faster in it, probably due to the comfortable fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 144 days ago
Underappreciated: a comfortable daily trainer that fits the bill.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 145 days ago
First 7 km: roomy comfortable fit, lively and bouncy without being too soft; finicky lacing and weaker wet grip.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 145 days ago
Foam felt flat after 200 km and caused arch pain by 450 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 145 days ago
Hoped it would be their daily trainer but the midfoot is too narrow.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 153 days ago
Loving them at 50 km: they really keep the legs fresh.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 154 days ago
After 100 km it gives great lower-leg relief, like the best kind of stability trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 155 days ago
Honestly real nice; their pick when they want more road feel.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 155 days ago
Too narrow for their slightly wide feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 160 days ago
Prefers it to the Glycerin 22: more energy, lighter, better shock absorption.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 161 days ago
100 miles with zero knee or stability issues and still like new; mildly narrow toe box.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 161 days ago
Not crazy about them: feel a bit dead on longer runs for a heavier runner.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 161 days ago
A slog to run in with far less energy return than the original SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 161 days ago
So bad they threw away two pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 167 days ago
Reaching end of life at 450 miles and already bought a duplicate pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 167 days ago
Great lockdown, comfortable upper, not too plush: 9/10, 10/10 if lighter.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 168 days ago
Loves it alongside their other Hoka shoes.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 172 days ago
They used to run in the Noosa Tri 16 but their feet swelled while running, which they found very bothersome, and they moved on to look at other trail shoes.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 173 days ago
A long-time Altra runner logged 435 miles on one pair of Escalante 4s before blowout, and their current pair is still going strong past 400 miles.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 173 days ago
Of three pairs of Escalante 4s, one died early (around 450km), while their current pair is still strong at 500km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 178 days ago
30 miles: perfectly adequate and great for walking, but not loved next to race-foam super trainers.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 182 days ago
A max-cushion fan who owns around 20 pairs of Plus and Turbo shoes, they find the Plus 1 a little lean in stack and mostly about looks.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 182 days ago
Bought a second pair: loves it to pieces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 184 days ago
Likes the Supernova Rise 2 for easy runs and walking, but the midsole felt worn out past 300 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 187 days ago
Agrees with a glowing review; the snug midfoot caused no issues.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 187 days ago
Enjoying it as a cushioned option.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 188 days ago
240 miles for a high school distance runner: the gold standard daily trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 189 days ago
Digging them at 50 miles and ordered another pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 192 days ago
Got them back into running: fun and reliable, doubles as a travel shoe.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 195 days ago
They began running in the Pureboost 5 and find it really comfortable, but it is not suited to their wooded hilly trails with slippery, sandy and rooty sections.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 199 days ago
After about 80 km of easy runs including a 17 km long run, the Supernova Rise 3 feels plush on step-in but its heavily padded upper cuts internal volume and the geometry becomes problematic, below their expectations from the Rise 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 199 days ago
The Supernova Rise 3 is good and really comfortable for slow runs and walking with a durable outsole, but faster than easy pace it feels like running through sand.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 202 days ago
Perfect even for their long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 203 days ago
Firm and dead at first, but came to life after about 50 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 209 days ago
First run for a sub-1:30 HM hopeful: a firmer do-it-all shoe that suits their mid-volume foot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 209 days ago
Loves it as a Superblast 2 replacement.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 226 days ago
Still runs every day in one pair of Pegasus 41s with close to 3,000 km on them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 226 days ago
After a year and about 2,000 miles of half-marathon training, walking and travel, this runner calls the Cloudeclipse the most comfortable shoe they've worn, despite loud squeaking at first.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 232 days ago
Loves the Propel v4; it's comfortable where popular shoes like the Ghost and Pegasus hurt them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 234 days ago
A heavy runner about 15 miles into the Cloudmonster 3 Hyper finds them amazing, still breaking them in.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 238 days ago
A runner found the Ellipse feels like the 1080v13, more of a recovery or max-cushion daily trainer than a responsive one.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 238 days ago
Got about 350 miles out of their Propel v4 before retiring it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 238 days ago
Likes the Propel v5 for easy and recovery runs: soft enough, with some bounce.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 240 days ago
Nearing 400 miles in the Propel v4 on easy days: a good beater shoe, though the upper runs warm.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 241 days ago
After 900 km over two years, the Propel v4 was a do-everything daily trainer best around 5:00/km up to 20 km, but hard to run slowly in and thin late in long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 241 days ago
A light runner found the Propel v4's ride terrible and retired it after 100 miles because the foam broke down.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 241 days ago
Gave up on the Propel v4 after 93 miles: clompy plate, low drop and soft heel foam that compressed heavily.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 242 days ago
Owning both, the Supernova Rise 3 feels like a brick to them compared with the softer, bouncier Prima 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 244 days ago
With mild stability needs, the Supernova Rise 3 is pretty stable for a neutral shoe even on 25 km+ runs, with excellent wet grip, but after 185 km the softish midsole has worn in and is causing an issue.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 245 days ago
Two runs in, they really like the Supernova Rise 3, preferring it to the stiffer, firmer original Prima, and find its stability a godsend.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 246 days ago
Returned the Supernova Rise 3: UK 11 was too short and 11.5 too big, and as a mid-to-heel striker it felt like it slapped the ground.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 246 days ago
The Supernova Rise 3 felt extremely firm, unlike the Rise 2, so they returned it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 247 days ago
Loved the Velocity Nitro 4 at first (stable, fun, could pick up the pace), but the foam lost its liveliness around 100-125 km; after 200 km it's just a normal easy-run shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 247 days ago
Loved the Velocity Nitro 4 until the Aero Glide 3 replaced it; still a good shoe for the price but a bit overhyped.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 248 days ago
Having owned two pairs, this runner considers the Cloudmonster Hyper one of the most underrated shoes of recent years, especially at around $150 on sale.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 249 days ago
On their third pair, this runner calls the Cloudmonster Hyper a great do-almost-anything shoe, especially on discount.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 249 days ago
This runner enjoys the Cloudmonster Hyper at pace: landing on the forefoot feels effortlessly bouncy, while heel landings feel like a normal daily trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 250 days ago
Over 400 km, this 3:23 marathoner with wide feet and bunions found the original Cloudmonster Hyper true to size and excellent for long runs with marathon-pace segments.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 250 days ago
This runner loves the Cloudmonster Hyper and is on their third pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 250 days ago
This runner finds the Cloudmonster Hyper shines at faster paces, though the laces untie themselves when they sit down.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 261 days ago
This runner liked the original Cloudmonster Hyper as a mileage soaker at $120 on sale, but finds it way overpriced at retail.
YouTube · Road To Trail · 263 days ago
Retired after 935 km of running, with the midsole still going strong (a bit spongier than when new) and the outsole rubber holding up very well. The fit is very narrow, though the forefoot stretched somewhat over time, and a hole has started to show in the heel counter of both shoes, a possible weak point. They describe it as a light, flexible, fairly basic daily trainer and highly recommend it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 270 days ago
Their Experience Flow 2 felt flat past 300km, like a different shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 272 days ago
For long easy miles its foam is more protective and fun than the Noosa Tri, feeling the same at the end of a long run as the start.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 273 days ago
A beautiful low-stack daily that still feels perfect at 450 km and should last twice as long as their Supernova Rise 2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 273 days ago
Their daily trainer; they love it up to about 10–15 km, beyond which it feels less supportive.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 280 days ago
They found the Peg Plus soft for walking but hard and not bouncy when running, so after several tries they use it only as a walking shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 286 days ago
A runner since the early 1980s, they like the Peg Plus because it feels like a modern take on a traditional shoe with low stack and flexible forefoot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 287 days ago
They loved the Novablast 3 so much that they went through eight or nine pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 287 days ago
Their Novablast 3 pair is nearing the point of needing replacement.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 287 days ago
Two pairs started to die around 200 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 288 days ago
They agree with the loving comment and ran a sub-18 minute 5k in the Peg Plus.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 291 days ago
They found the Peg Plus awful and felt misled by the Turbo branding.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 292 days ago
They love the Peg Plus 1 and set personal records at 5k and 10k in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 292 days ago
They say the current Peg Plus hurts their feet after 10k and has one of the hardest ZoomX midsoles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 292 days ago
They are usually easygoing about shoes, but the Peg Plus was the first pair they ever had to return because it felt so harsh.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 292 days ago
They reserve the Peg Plus for speed days and as a casual work shoe, which they say it is also great for.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 292 days ago
They bought two pairs of the Peg Plus at steep discounts and love them for mid-distance runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 301 days ago
A long-time Triumph runner has almost 800 km on the Triumph 23 with plenty of life left. They use it for winter volume and long runs, find faster paces easier than in the T21, and say the grip is very good in wet and snow.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 301 days ago
A 50-mile review from a 1:32 half marathoner using it for all easy runs: energetic, responsive, protective midsole that stays good in the wet, a durable outsole with excellent grip and lots of cushioning.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 308 days ago
They bought the Rebel v5 and are loving it as a daily trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 314 days ago
They run three pairs of Mach 6 with about 300 miles on each and may just buy more.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 318 days ago
A heavy Rebel v4 fan tried the Rebel v5 but didn't enjoy the extra foam and softness, switching to the Evo SL.
YouTube · Cole Running · 320 days ago
About 50 miles, mostly easy running plus a few strides. It feels controlled, smooth and cushioned without being mushy, with stability the standout and good grip around wet corners. It feels a little flat but surprisingly responsive when picking up the pace, though it is not meant for tempo or threshold work. Fit is true to size but boxy, and the heel lockdown is not superb, so they used a runner's loop; no hot spots over about an hour.
YouTube · The FOD Runner · 322 days ago
About 100 miles, nearly all easy runs with some strides and the odd moderate effort. The midsole is light, poppy and responsive, the grip is exceptional even in grim conditions, and the upper shows no wear. Downsides are a very narrow fit that squashes the toes together (without causing aches), a shoe that soaks up water and gets heavy in the rain, and a left-right weight mismatch in their pair that they barely noticed while running. Best for easy days rather than long threshold sessions.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 323 days ago
A 200 lb runner put 450 miles on the Rebel v5 and noticed no loss of bounce until around 400.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 323 days ago
Comparing Rebel versions, a runner finds the v5 a little chunkier underfoot, making the ride feel a bit unnatural in the arch.
YouTube · Kyle Runs · 327 days ago
500 miles through a cross-country season of tempos, intervals and recovery runs. The ride is soft with a smooth rocker, feels light and nimble for workouts, and the fit is good with no heel slip. Wear shows in the exposed midsole foam and flattened rubber in places, though it lasted longer than they expected. They would recommend it to almost anyone, especially for recovery and long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 343 days ago
They consider the Rebel v5 more cushioned but less nimble than the v4 because of the added foam, so they see it as a daily trainer rather than a tempo shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 347 days ago
Says the Cloudsurfer Max runs large versus the Cloudsurfer 2, but sizing down was too tight; recommends regular On size.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 350 days ago
Has two pairs of the Mach 6 in wide, as it runs narrower than the Mafate Speed 4; one pair has 400 miles, has lost some bounce and still has a good outsole, and handles urban hills well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 353 days ago
Their daily trainer through four pairs, each retired at about 600 km when their feet started getting sore.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 360 days ago
They only own it because the Velocity Nitro 4 is too narrow; otherwise a lackluster shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 361 days ago
Their Supernova Rise 2 upper tore at the toe-box flex point after 100 km, though they were awesome otherwise with a wider toe box than the Pegasus.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 363 days ago
They found the Vomero hurt their feet compared with the Pegasus Plus, and ran a full marathon in the Plus without trouble.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 364 days ago
Found the Torin 8 in size 9 too narrow for their wide feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 366 days ago
Bought as a walking shoe, the Supernova Rise 2 became their favourite boring daily trainer in years; its Dreamstrike+ beats other brands' basic trainer foams.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 367 days ago
Two pairs: the older one is flatter and now for recovery, the newer one is great up to threshold pace, though the Evo SL gets more use.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 367 days ago
A really good shoe that suited their narrow foot, though the Velocity Nitro 4 has lasted far longer for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 372 days ago
A month in the Supernova Rise 2 and loves it: just right on bounce, firmness, softness, energy return and stability, disappearing on runs; their Evo SL and Boston 12 now sit unused.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 375 days ago
They call the Rebel v4 the shortest-lived shoe they have owned; it was great until it went dead.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 375 days ago
They loved the 1080v13 enough to wear out three pairs before trying Novablasts and moving to the v14.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 375 days ago
They do not run but have put roughly 500-600 miles of walking into their 1080 v13.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 375 days ago
They bought the Rebel v5 for 84 pounds and after 15 km of wear are really impressed.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 376 days ago
They bought the Rebel v5 a few months back and were surprised it became one of their favorites in their weekly rotation.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 376 days ago
They loved the 1080 v13 and got just under 600 km from it, though another shoe cushions long runs better.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 381 days ago
After 80 miles, a runner finds the Pegasus Plus fun but not versatile enough for longer runs, wanting more heel stack, and expensive versus rivals.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 392 days ago
A runner loves the Mach 6; their current pair is beat at 500 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 396 days ago
After 131 miles of threshold and interval work, rates the Noosa Tri 16 an underhyped tempo trainer; fits half a size short but the toebox is accommodating.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 396 days ago
Over 400km in the Noosa Tri 16; light, fun, aggressively rockered and still holding up well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 403 days ago
After 300km from hill sprints to recovery runs, rates the Experience Flow 2 an excellent, very light daily trainer, their favourite since the Novablast 1.
YouTube · What Matters to Matt · 410 days ago
After 150 miles at around 170 to 175 lb, including wet runs, the fit was right immediately: true to size, a long thin tongue with no lace bite and a roomy toe box, though the upper is not very breathable. The very soft foam lost its initial bounce quickly but still does a good job, and the outsole shows very little wear. They call it a great daily trainer that will not do the work for you at faster paces, and some may feel lost in the foam on longer runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 411 days ago
A Mach 5 fan says the Mach 6 ruined the line for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 418 days ago
Wished the Velocity Nitro 4 worked for them but it was too narrow for their feet.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 429 days ago
At 6'6" and 220 lb, running 4 miles every few days, the Supernova Rise 2 (bought for $40) gives real bounce; they cut 30 seconds off their mile and ran with a smile.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 429 days ago
On their fourth pair, a runner keeps returning to the Mach 6 after trying other shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 436 days ago
The Kinvara 16 is softer and bouncier than earlier versions; after adding a forefoot insert it's perfect for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 436 days ago
A 220 lb runner loves the Mach 6 for speed days; at 150 miles it still feels great.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 436 days ago
A runner felt the Mach 6 lacked support as a daily trainer and wasn't enough as a faster shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 436 days ago
A runner had to retire the Mach 6 early because the midsole packed out quickly.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 437 days ago
A former Mach 4 and 5 fan has no complaints about the Mach 6 but finds it nothing special.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 446 days ago
This runner calls the Pegasus Plus amazing and super light, preferring it to the Pegasus Premium for running.
YouTube · The FOD Runner · 451 days ago
200 miles of easy runs, 30 to 90 minutes each, on roads and dry, non-technical trails. The outsole and upper held up very well and the wide platform caused no ankle trouble, but the soft foam gave little spring from the start and felt like mush by about 100 miles. They plan to retire it at 200, call it an easy-day shoe only, and would not recommend it for picking up the pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 452 days ago
They were very disappointed with the Velocity Nitro 4 because of a problem with the internal finishing around the tongue gusset.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 453 days ago
First workout in the Kinvara 16: back to a lower, more connected feel like the Kinvara 13, and it fit their long, narrow feet well out of the box.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 455 days ago
At 127 lb with 200 miles on the Supernova Rise 2: a good fit, Dreamstrike+ that feels just right at any pace including 400s at 5K effort, and no slowing down; but the outsole slipped on wet concrete and they fell.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 455 days ago
Loves the Supernova Rise 2, bought two pairs on sale; it's their favourite treadmill shoe and the upper is holding up at about 100 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 455 days ago
Liked the Supernova Rise 2 at first, but the Dreamstrike broke down in the heel quickly and the lack of rocker made it boring; fine for $40.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 455 days ago
A heavier runner likes the Supernova Rise 2 fine, but it feels hard on the heels past an hour.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 455 days ago
The Supernova Rise 2 feels slower than their Novablast, with good cushioning but average energy return, so it became a very comfortable walking shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 459 days ago
They like their Pegasus Plus a lot, but at 400 miles the outsole tread is badly worn at about 155 lbs and they notice slipping during intervals.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 460 days ago
First run in the Velocity Nitro 4: long and narrow Puma fit, soft and responsive Nitro foam, excellent grip; a 9/10 daily trainer that can do tempo.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 460 days ago
Found the Velocity Nitro 4 a super fun, bouncy budget daily trainer, but got rid of it because the 10mm drop and thin forefoot didn't suit them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 460 days ago
Finds the Experience Flow 2 much better and more responsive than the first Flow, with no issues from the upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 461 days ago
They love the Peg Plus and say it just worked from the start, though the Evo SL has since overtaken it in their rotation.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 461 days ago
They like the Pegasus Plus as a decent shoe for them but think it was far too expensive at retail.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 461 days ago
They bought the Pegasus Plus on sale for about 75 dollars, call it a great training shoe, and found it surprisingly good in a 10k race.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 462 days ago
They love the Peg Plus for its classic running feel: not heavily rockered, moderately cushioned with some ground feel, a great knit upper and firm heel counter.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 462 days ago
They found the Pegasus Plus below average and not built for runs beyond 7-8 miles even for a 170 lb runner, and moved on to the Vomero.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 462 days ago
They loved their Pegasus Plus but felt it lost its pop after roughly 150 miles at about 210 lbs body weight.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 462 days ago
They hoped the Peg Plus would replace the Peg Turbo but found it only works for shorter distances.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 465 days ago
Enjoyed every run across 570 miles in the Supernova Prima; the pop faded around 300 miles and it felt stiff near the end, but they may buy another pair.
YouTube · Sagasu Running · 465 days ago
Roughly 50 miles in 11 runs over two weeks, including seven days in a row, with the foam feeling fresh each morning and no visible outsole wear. It is light, flexible and responsive, with a secure lockdown and good grip, and they expect it to cope with tempo work and longer runs, though they don't describe doing those. The fit is narrow (a wide version exists) and it is very neutral, so runners needing medial support should think twice.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 466 days ago
After 21 miles, a mild overpronator rates the Hyperion 3 9/10 for upper and ride: softer and more versatile than the Hyperion 2 with good stability, though heavier with a narrower fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 476 days ago
The Supernova Prima feels low to the ground and harsh at slow pace; very disappointing.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 476 days ago
After about 20 miles, the Supernova Rise 2 feels much firmer and less enjoyable than the original Rise.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 476 days ago
After 300 miles on the original Rise, they moved seamlessly into the Supernova Rise 2: an identical feel with a slightly better upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 476 days ago
Their $47 SL2, sized up to an 11, was insane on a 9-miler: like the Endorphin Speed 3 once warmed up but able to slow down without hip trouble, and the stock laces held with a heel lock.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 477 days ago
Bought the Experience Flow 2 at launch: a very soft new foam, softer than the 1080v14, but borderline too soft, with a narrow heel base and lower volume.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 481 days ago
The SL2 is decently soft, but its grippy outsole and warm upper let their foot slide forward, causing blister calluses by the big toe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 483 days ago
Digging the SL2 after a first treadmill run; their Evo SLs are flat after six months.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 483 days ago
Used the SL2 for easy runs for a while, but even with narrow feet it felt too narrow in the midfoot; a decent shoe and good value.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 484 days ago
About 200 miles on the SL2: they really enjoyed it at first but now more often reach for the Novablast 5.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 484 days ago
A 120 lb high-school runner's first 12 miles in the SL2: firm at first, then light with a nice pop and quick toe-off close to their Endorphin Speed 4; average for easy runs, very good at long-run or tempo pace, but the padded upper is warm.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 486 days ago
Loves the Ride 18; a few mm more stack would make it perfect for them.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 487 days ago
At 172 lb and 40–50 mpw, the Supernova Prima is their daily: a wider, cheaper Superblast-like shoe that's versatile and protective, with no outsole issues.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 487 days ago
At 210–215 lb with 150 miles on the Supernova Prima: well cushioned, fine at moderate paces, great for long runs up to 28 km without bottoming out; on their second pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 487 days ago
Bought on sale to replace their Triumph 20s for long runs, they've really enjoyed the Supernova Prima: straightforward, comfortable, nothing fancy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 487 days ago
Initially a huge fan of the Supernova Prima (comfortable, wide, stable), but had to retire it at 450 km when it suddenly felt like cardboard and gave them knee pain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 492 days ago
A 56-year-old runner who prefers a higher drop likes the Hyperion 3 a lot after one run and expects it to suit interval and tempo workouts.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 493 days ago
Owns the Cloudsurfer 2; no squeaking and a fairly firm ride.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 494 days ago
Owned Cloudsurfers last year and they squeaked constantly; won't buy again.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 496 days ago
Two runs in the Experience Flow 2: an amazing toe box, but a big runner finds too little cushion and no pop for over 10 miles; rates it 7/10.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 497 days ago
They use the Ride 18 as their daily runner but liked the earlier Ride 15 more.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 499 days ago
A quick first run in the Velocity Nitro 4: poppy and soft but not mushy, with surprising stability for a mild overpronator.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 500 days ago
First run in the Velocity Nitro 4 turned into 16 km of fun: softer, more responsive full-PEBA midsole, a comfortable stretchy wider upper that fits wide feet, and at home at easy and tempo pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 509 days ago
700 km on the Supernova Prima and still going strong; great for recovery and long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 512 days ago
About 100 km in, the Supernova Prima has softened a little but isn't mushy, is protective on 12–14 km runs and stable enough to replace their Evo SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 512 days ago
A former Turbo NN runner now uses the Pegasus Plus as their daily shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 513 days ago
Returned the Supernova Prima after one run: it took real effort to reach even tempo pace and felt flat from the start.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
Retired the Supernova Prima after 1,000 km: very durable, especially at easier paces, with good stability, though sluggish at faster paces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
At 205 lb and 25–35 mpw, their first run in the Supernova Prima (bought for $64) was the most enjoyable first run they've had; it feels protective without being mushy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
Ten miles in, the Supernova Prima's Dreamstrike+ is fun and comfortable at almost any pace and getting bouncier; it may steal miles from their Superblasts.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
The Supernova Prima's foam lost much of its energy and bounce after about 70 miles, though the first 20–30 were heaven.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
As a lighter runner, the Supernova Prima's foam feels firm with no squish or bounce: the most average of the 20+ models they've owned, but satisfying for $60.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 514 days ago
Has run over 1,000 miles in several pairs of the Pegasus 41 in Pacific Northwest weather year-round, on gravel trails and asphalt. Would have sworn its traction is better than the Gel Nimbus 26's.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 516 days ago
After a few runs including a 5-mile tempo, the Rebel v5 fixes the v4's fit problems: true to size with normal width, a padded heel collar and a proper tongue.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 516 days ago
They weren't a fan of the Rebel v4: comically wide in standard width, a dead midsole, a heel collar that rubbed their Achilles and a very short tongue.
YouTube · Jake Berney · 518 days ago
About 600 km over six months as a main daily trainer. They like the versatility from easy to mid-effort runs, the light weight, and a roomy fit with good midfoot lockdown. Downsides are the low speedboard crunching on salt and pebbles, and poor grip in winter with snow packing into the pockets. Durability is okay, with the foam slightly less responsive than new. Best on smooth, flat roads.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 519 days ago
The Supernova Prima was extremely uncomfortable for its first 40–45 km (starting with a half marathon), then fit and felt like a dream once broken in.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 521 days ago
A long-time 880 runner enjoyed the v14 as a light, simple daily with good ground feel, though the foam lacked return; they found the v15 clunky.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 522 days ago
Put over 300 miles on the Rebel v4 in a year for runs up to 10 miles and speed work; poppy early on, really comfy and fun.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 524 days ago
The Rebel v4 was a disaster for them after loving the v2 and v3.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 526 days ago
Finds the Supernova Prima far better than the boring original Supernova Rise.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 526 days ago
Finds the original Supernova Rise pretty boring and the Supernova Prima far better.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 526 days ago
On a second pair of Rebel v4, used for tempo runs and hills up to 8 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 526 days ago
Loves the Rebel v4 and has never had running shoes fit better; bought a second pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 527 days ago
Finds the Rebel v4's sweet spot is easy 5Ks and 4-mile tempos; with only 30 mm in the forefoot a 20-mile run feels bleh.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 527 days ago
After two pairs each of the Rebel v2 and v3 to 600 km, found the v4 a total lemon: short and wide and far too soft.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 527 days ago
Loved the Rebel v2 and v3, but the v4 has been a flop, boring with a worse fit, one of their least favourite shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 527 days ago
Loves the Adizero SL2 for most runs, up to 10 miles without issue, with decent energy return to go faster; pairs it with the EVO SL, which is faster but not as good on slow runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 528 days ago
After 100 miles not enjoying the Ride 18: flat with none of the 17's bounce, though roomier in the toe box.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 529 days ago
Always gets arch pain in the Adizero SL, while the Supernova Rise 2 gives them no trouble.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 531 days ago
Found the Rebel v4 comfy with a roomy toe box, fine for a half marathon but heavy and not aggressive enough, so sold it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 532 days ago
Prefers the v3 but finds the Rebel v4 solid; its wide base and lower stack felt safe while recovering from an ankle sprain.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 533 days ago
They report heel pain in the Torin 8 and find the back of the shoe uncomfortable and stiff.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 533 days ago
Bought for $58, the SL2 felt nice once broken in and is excellent for daily grinding, but lacks the stability for runs over 20 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 535 days ago
The SL2 is their new favourite trainer and distance shoe: bliss for easy runs and great for long runs and ultras, with no foot soreness, blisters or hot spots; break-in takes 20–30 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 535 days ago
A runner who doubted the Hyperion 3 found it insanely fun to run in once they had a couple of runs in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 536 days ago
210 km on the SL2 with no visible wear: one of the best daily trainers around at an incredible price.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 536 days ago
About 300 km on the SL2 for faster runs (4–5 min/km): heel wear showed early but they still feel great and may buy another pair.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 537 days ago
After 344 km of easy runs and intervals, the SL2 is stable with a very cushioned upper and midsole, far more comfortable and responsive than the original SL; outsole durability is worse and the laces need double-knotting.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 537 days ago
700 km on the SL2 with only normal outsole wear; the midsole is less responsive now, but for the price it's an excellent, great-value daily shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 537 days ago
At 6'1" and 83 kg, the SL2 feels unstable slower than 4:30/km and it's hard to hold form at their 4:45–5:00/km easy pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 537 days ago
A 235 lb runner retired the SL2 at 300 miles with little wear, used for everything from 8 min/mile tempo to 11+ min/mile recovery, mostly on crushed-rock trail.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 537 days ago
Owns two pairs of the SL2 and uses them for all types of training: a great shoe at a reasonable price.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes · 538 days ago
After Mach 4s and 5s, found the Mach 6 less soft and felt pain in both calves after 50 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 541 days ago
A runner on their second pair of Mach 6 is in love with it and will buy a third.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 544 days ago
Wore the Supernova Rise 2 walking around Disney World all day for a week and their feet felt great; very comfortable.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 546 days ago
About 250 miles on the original Supernova Rise: a really good daily trainer for runs up to 13 miles and recovery miles, never a bad run.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 546 days ago
The Supernova Rise 2 is softer than any EVA shoe they've had, a comfortable everyday runner; it was their only shoe on a week-long trip for walking and a couple of runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 546 days ago
Just bought the SL2 for £70: it feels short even with thin socks and gives hot spots on the balls of both feet, but feels like a good easy-day shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 547 days ago
Running in the SL2 since December, one full size up, with no blisters; satisfied over 5–10 km and even 21 km, though pain starts near the 21 km mark.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 547 days ago
Loves the SL2's feel overall, but had to change the insole to stop medial arch irritation.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Retired at 442 miles: the SL2 was light and fast for a daily and encouraged quick turnover, but hot spots and blisters limited it to runs under 6 miles, and the midsole went dead.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Half a size up, the SL2 gave them blisters that limited runs to under 10 km, but it's light and responsive with good grip; months later they've come to love it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Used as a tempo-ish daily, the SL2 promotes quick turnover but has too little structure past 6–7 miles; they hated the first 5–6 runs, the insole is the worst part, and it gave them early-run Achilles pain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Their SL2 felt dead and flat by 550 km and hurts their knees even at slow pace; they really liked it for the first 200 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Relegated the SL2 to walking: durable grippy outsole, but too much old Lightstrike, bad laces, a narrow fit and blisters on their big toes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Their least favourite Adidas shoe: the SL2's fit is all over the place and the cushion is awkward with no energy return.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Loves the SL2's foam and firmness for daily training but gets blisters unless they wear thick socks.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Among the worst shoes they've bought: the SL2 collar rubbed painful blisters on the first run, the upper wore through, and cushioning was gone by about 500 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
About 480 miles on the SL2; blisters on the big toe edge were fixed by swapping in an old Novablast insole.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 548 days ago
Loves the SL2's fit and look, but the foam's bounce faded by about 100 miles and it feels firm on anything over 5 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 551 days ago
Gets arch blisters in the SL2, possibly from their arches overhanging the narrow midfoot.
Reddit · r/running · 558 days ago
A runner finds the Kinvara 15 feels like running on air compared to today's clunky high-stack shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 569 days ago
After 35 miles, finds the Experience Flow 2 a solid upgrade over the v1: better heel lockdown, and a new foam that pops with nice rebound, though the fit is a little tighter.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 571 days ago
A 185 lb runner's Rebel v4 outsole died around 230 km, before the foam.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 572 days ago
A runner returned two sizes of the Mach 6: too narrow at the toe or too big at the heel.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 574 days ago
Has run in every Mach since the 4 and loves the Mach 6, reaching for it far more than the heavier Mach X.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 575 days ago
They run the Rebel v4 for faster runs and find it perfect, with a toe box wide enough to stay comfortable.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 575 days ago
After about five months they absolutely love it and plan to buy another pair.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 575 days ago
They are down to their last two pairs of the Rincon 3 and worry about what comes next, implying they like it a lot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 576 days ago
Likes the Mach 6 as a daily trainer but finds it nothing special beyond that.
YouTube · jogoncrago · 579 days ago
Two pairs, 860 km and then 210 km, used almost entirely for long runs and easy runs over an hour. They love the secure, roomy upper (it fits about a half size long) and the bouncy forefoot with a structured, stable feel that keeps the legs fresh over 2.5 to 3 hours. It stays firm and a bit clunky for the first half hour or more, the outsole rubber pods wear so heavy heel strikers should be wary, and they call the price far too high. A dedicated long-run shoe more than a daily one.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 585 days ago
Retired their Velocity Nitro 3 at over 800 miles, double their usual 400; very durable.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 586 days ago
Loves the Velocity Nitro 3 so much they own four pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 586 days ago
Finds the Velocity Nitro 3 a pretty firm shoe, which they prefer to the overly soft Novablast 5.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 586 days ago
Uses the Rebel v4 but just doesn't get on with it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 609 days ago
Loves the Ride 18 but its sole wore out at about 197 miles, so they're going back to the 17.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 614 days ago
A runner loves the Rebel v4 for tempo and intervals as a sweet spot between soft and firm.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 616 days ago
A runner finds the Mach 6 needs quick cadence and isn't great for plodding, but likes its stability for indoor track runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 617 days ago
The SL2 is vastly different from the brick-like SL1, whose aggressive arch poked their flat feet: bouncier, not as firm, no aggressive arch, a little unstable at times. A great experience.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 621 days ago
A runner found the Mach 6 the least durable shoe they've owned, worn through to the forefoot foam by 300-350 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
The Supernova Prima feels more stable than the Rise, but they'd pick their Novablast 4 for its lighter weight and energy return.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
A runner used the Pegasus Plus as a lighter tempo shoe but didn't enjoy it and returned it after 30 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
A 68 kg runner's Rebel v4 died at 200 miles, with the soles dead and deformed.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
A runner was incredibly impressed by the Mach 6 as a tempo and daily shoe, though they needed a high-arch insole.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 622 days ago
At 200-250 km, a 185 lb runner loves the Rebel v4's bounce, upper and width, though cushioning fades after 12-13 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 623 days ago
A light 53 kg runner found the Rebel v4 felt flat and boring after less than 100 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 623 days ago
After 900 km in the Rebel v4, a runner prefers the Mach 6 and uses it for tempo and intervals.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 623 days ago
A runner's Rebel v4 felt flat after 150 miles and caused small pains, so they retired it at 265 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
A runner loves the Mach 6 as an everything shoe that still feels great at 600 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
At nearly 400 km, a runner's Mach 6 still feels great with minimal outsole wear.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
At about 350 miles a runner finds the Mach 6 superb and still solid, preferring it to the Rebel v4.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
Retiring the Rebel v4 at 915 km, a lightweight runner finds it more cushioned but less bouncy than v2/v3, flatter around 600 km and short in length.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
A 130 lb runner loved the Rebel v4 at first but it felt completely dead after about 250 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
A runner finds the Rebel v4 less responsive than expected and slightly short for its size.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 624 days ago
A 160 lb runner loves the Rebel v4 but the midsole fell off a cliff around 200 miles; they bought another pair anyway.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 626 days ago
Having loved the original, this runner found the Cloudmonster 2 squishier, less fun and quick to wear out.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 626 days ago
The Mach 6 is a smooth, rockered, light daily trainer; they like it, though less than the EVO SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 627 days ago
After a short first run, this runner who struggles with fit really likes the Cloudmonster Hyper's roomy upper.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 631 days ago
This bigger, older beginner put about 1,000 miles on two pairs of the original Cloudmonster and finds its compressing foam comfortable at slow paces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 631 days ago
This wide-midfoot runner says the Cloudmonster 2 is the only shoe that fits their whole foot without sizing up or buying a wide, though it's pricey and they want more pep.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 640 days ago
A Pegasus Plus owner likes its lightness and bounce for tempo work, but feels a lack of rigidity at paces faster than 4:00/km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 642 days ago
A runner happily heads out for another run in their beloved Pegasus 41.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 643 days ago
Has 210 miles on the Adizero SL2 and 160 on the EVO SL and would always pick the SL2 for an easy run, because the EVO SL makes it too easy to go fast.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 648 days ago
A runner loves the 880 v14's secure fit and extra arch support, a happy medium on cushioning that helped their pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 648 days ago
Three runs into the Torin 8 with no heel collar issues; the closest thing to their favourite Torin 4.5, with a toe box they can rely on.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 649 days ago
After 220 km including a marathon, a runner got a black toe and lost the nail despite sizing up a full size.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 649 days ago
After the Torin 7 didn't work out, finds the Torin 8 a much more refined shoe: more stable, slightly firmer and more rockered, no ankle rubbing, though the toe box is still low.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 652 days ago
A runner loves the Wave Rider 28, preferring it to the Wave Sky 8 after a 50 km break-in.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 652 days ago
A light 58 kg runner calls the 1080v13 an all-time favorite for easy runs, preferring its soft midsole to the Nimbus; they found the v14 firmer and disappointing.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 652 days ago
Near 600 km, a runner found the Mach 6 firm for the first 50 km, then absolutely great up to 500 km, holding up well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 658 days ago
At 600km their Noosa Tri 16's outsole is still in excellent shape but the midsole is dead; they felt faster than the Adios SL2.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 659 days ago
After 500 km of easy runs and track workouts, a forefoot-striking marathoner still calls the Pegasus Plus the best up-tempo trainer since the Speed 2, holding up nicely.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 659 days ago
A runner enjoys the Pegasus Plus and finds their Achilles always feels better after running in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 659 days ago
The Pegasus Plus gave this runner blisters on both feet, and they returned it after about 30 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 659 days ago
A Pegasus 41 owner says it fits perfectly with no issues after 400 miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 660 days ago
First 10 miles in the Ride 18: very comfortable, plush upper and secure fit with no heel slip for narrow feet, true to size.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 660 days ago
Thinks the Ride 18 is great, though it runs flat and plops down for a midfoot striker.
Reddit · r/trailrunning · 660 days ago
A wide-footed runner who sizes up is on their second pair of Mach 6 and finds it fun, fast and effortless.
YouTube · Joshua Hubbard · 663 days ago
Over 125 miles in them, with a longest run of 12 miles, and the midsole rated a standout: snappy, with good energy return, and versatile enough for easy runs, long runs, strides and tempo work. They found the upper durable and the shoe lightweight, and expect 300 to 400 miles from a pair. Downsides: the fit is snug and a bit narrow, so they suggest sizing up half a size, and they feel it is best up to about half-marathon distance.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 666 days ago
On their second pair after the first lost its softness at 400 km, a runner calls the Rebel v4 the best plateless shoe they've had.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 668 days ago
Does regular 90+ minute runs in the SL2 with no issues; it feels faster than the softer Novablast 5.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 669 days ago
Owns both the SL2 and Evo SL: the SL2 for easy runs, the Evo SL for tempo, race pace and long intervals.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 669 days ago
After about 120 km the SL2 never felt special to them, and they shelved it for the Novablast 4.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 670 days ago
400 km on the SL2: worth it at a good price, but the fit is weird and very narrow in the midfoot compared to the AP3, Boston and Evo SL.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 670 days ago
At 6'2" and 186 lb, the SL2 is comfortable from easy pace down to 5K pace.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 670 days ago
Loves the SL2 foam, but it was too narrow and a bit short; fine for a couple of runs, then shelved for fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 670 days ago
A 190 lb heel striker training for London ran 15 km on a treadmill in the SL2: runs small, a solid daily-trainer upper, and a dense but energetic midsole that's just right for daily miles.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 671 days ago
A New Balance runner finds the Propel v5 massively underrated and a fantastic daily shoe, replacing their Rebel v4s with it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 674 days ago
A new runner training for a half finds the Mach 6, bought a half size up, surprisingly comfy and protective for its weight.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 674 days ago
A runner loves their Mach 6 and Mach X 2 rotation; the Mach 6 runs a tad shorter than the Mach 5.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 676 days ago
A 220 lb runner with about 550 miles on the Triumph 20, still their go-to long-run shoe: soft but not marshmallowy. The Magnify Nitro 2's foam isn't as comfortable.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 676 days ago
Loved the Novablast 1 and 3, but running more than 10 miles in the Novablast 3 led to posterior tibial and flexor hallucis tendinopathy.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 678 days ago
Even half a size up, the SL2 causes inner ankle and calf pain, especially on slow recovery runs, though they like how it feels.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 680 days ago
A 200 lb runner who hated the 1080v13: a soft foam that didn't bounce back, unlike the Triumph 21.
YouTube · It's Matt B · 682 days ago
At least 20 miles, mostly easy runs, with a longest single run of about 10 miles that left their feet feeling fine. The foam runs a little firm at first and softens after about 20 miles, settling into a middle ground that never gets plush. The upper is light and breathable with a thickly padded, rigid heel and no lace bite or heel slip, but the fit runs narrow. Plenty of outsole rubber suggests it will last, and they see it suiting easy runs and strides.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 683 days ago
A 2:50 marathoner training for Boston has 41 miles (including a 12-miler first run) in the Supernova Prima: it disappears into the run and they own two pairs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 683 days ago
Bought the Supernova Prima for about $60 and was really impressed on a long run: smooth and solid, not too soft or firm, super comfortable upper, and no traction issues in rain.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 683 days ago
On a second pair of Rebel v4; a 10 km tempo had zero issues.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 685 days ago
Bought the Pegasus Plus on sale and still felt it wasn't worth it: a weird, baggy upper and a toned-down ZoomX foam. Says the EVO SL is everything the Pegasus Plus should have been.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 687 days ago
A bigger runner's first 2 miles in the Rebel v4 felt springy and natural at uptempo pace, with a breathable upper and a little heel slip.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 688 days ago
A Pegasus Plus owner liked their old Streakfly more and notes the ZoomX is very loud on landing.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 691 days ago
About 50 km, mostly on road, at a range of paces. The fit is true to size, a little narrow but roomy enough in the toe box, with good midfoot lockdown and no heel slip. The ride is firm and snappy rather than soft and bouncy, with more ground feel than big-stack trainers, and it works best landing midfoot with quick feet. A competent daily trainer that suits cruising pace, though some will find it too traditional and tame.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 703 days ago
Finds the 1080 v13 very soft and has had no trouble running 10K pace in it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 704 days ago
A runner shelved the 1080 v13 because its ride felt mushy with no energy return and their feet got very sweaty on a 10-miler.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 705 days ago
A runner got tibia pain after each run in the 1080 v13 and is thinking of going back to their old shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 706 days ago
At 500 km, a 210 lb runner finds the 1080 v13 great for comfortable slow miles, with minimal wear: built to last.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 706 days ago
With 350 and 150 miles on two pairs, a runner finds the 1080 v13 has held up great as their go-to recovery shoe.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 706 days ago
A runner finds the 1080 v13 a little tight on the toes in their normal size.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 706 days ago
A runner who just started in the 1080 v13 loves it as the softest shoe they've run in and recommends sizing up.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 706 days ago
A runner likes the 1080 v13 and prefers it to the Nimbus 25 for being a bit more responsive.
