Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
Trail
Runners are mixed on it.
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
Showing 1 review mentioning fast Show all
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · summarized
PositiveA-: 'a huge fan'. A well-done heel bevel kickstarts the rocker almost seamlessly, and it feels good at easy and rhythmic paces with a reserve for going fast. He'd train in it and maybe race. The midfoot could be cleaner.
Runners are mixed on it. Many like the Agravic SL's bouncy, quick ride on less technical trails, but the most common complaint is instability, with ankles rolling for several runners. Fit is a second issue, with some finding the toe box narrow or the sizing off. It suits non-technical trails best.
Of the 20 reviews with a clear verdict, 60% are positive, 20% mixed and 20% negative. The praise mentioned most is responsive. The most common complaint is unstable.
The complaints reviewers mention most: unstable (4 reviews), narrow fit (2 reviews) and blisters (1 review). For example: As a mid/forefoot striker half a size down, they find the Agravic SL very unstable, less confident than the Agravic Speed Ultra.
We collected and summarized 20 experiences shared on Reddit, blogs and YouTube, with links to the original sources. Reviews submitted here are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, submitted here or collected, is read as positive, mixed or negative.
Trail and off-road shoes, ranked by real runners.
