Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
Compared from 287 real runner reviews
adidas Adizero Boston 12 vs adidas Adizero Boston 13 vs Nike Zoom Fly 6
Side by side from 287 real reviews. Every count is the same as on each shoe’s page.
How the signal works
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
93 signal
172 reviews82 signal
59 reviews84 signal
56 reviewsIn short
Firm, very durable and grippy for tempo days; the main complaint is heel slip and poor lockdown.
Stable, firm tempo shoe with secure lockdown; some find it stiff, and the toe box is tapered.
Responsive tempo shoe with a no-fuss upper that many run for hundreds of kilometres; firm for some.
Liked mostreviews mentioning it
Watch forreviews mentioning it
Specs
- Weight
- 260 g (9.2 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 37 mm heel / 30.5 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6.5 mm
- Weight
- 255 g (9 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 36 mm heel / 30 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 6 mm
- Weight
- 244 g (8.6 oz), men's
- Stack height
- 40 mm heel / 32 mm forefoot
- Drop
- 8 mm
More comparisons
- adidas Adizero Boston 12 vs Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
- adidas Adizero Boston 12 vs adidas Adizero Boston 13
- adidas Adizero Boston 13 vs New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Trainer v3
- adidas Adizero Boston 13 vs Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
- Nike Zoom Fly 6 vs Saucony Sinister
- Nike Zoom Fly 6 vs Saucony Endorphin Speed 3
Shares count reviews with a clear verdict from the recent window, like each shoe’s page. Tags are counted over the same reviews. All shoes