Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Sep 16, 2026 · summarized
NegativeGave up after 100 miles: liked the foam but the geometry felt cumbersome and slappy.
Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!
ASICS Superblast 2 Reviews
Max cushionRanked #1 in Max cushion
Firm, stable and very durable, though some never warm to the stiff, heavy feel at slow paces.
How the signal works
The signal score
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
What people mention
Common concerns
Real runner experiences (188)
Add your reviewShowing 7 reviews mentioning heavy Show all
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Aug 31, 2026 · summarized
NegativeFelt like a brick to them, unlike smoother-rolling shoes.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Aug 24, 2025 · summarized
NegativeLoved the first Superblast but does not like the Superblast 2 at all, finding it clunky, uncomfortable and a giant shoe. Says the original was just as big but rode smoothly, which is why they tried the Megablast instead.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Jun 6, 2025 · summarized
NegativeAfter about 50 km they found the Superblast 2 clunky and too firm and didn't enjoy it, preferring the Supernova Prima for long runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Feb 19, 2025 · summarized
NegativeA 57-year-old new marathoner who runs about 6 min/km bought the Superblast 2 to replace worn Triumph 21s and is returning it. Finds it loud, clunky, slappy and big; it felt better at 5 min/km but not at their usual jog, even after 30 km.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Oct 6, 2024 · summarized
NegativeA 125-135 lb forefoot striker found the Superblast 2's forefoot fine but the heel overbuilt, chunky and brick-firm. After a 24 km long run their leg felt worked; they call it awkward and clunky, better for marathon-pace efforts than easy runs.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Oct 4, 2024 · summarized
MixedThe Superblast 2 felt lifeless and bulky at first, but nearly 200 km in it improved from about 100 km and became more flexible. Now likes it as a nice shoe, though nothing special, and too big underfoot to want to run fast.
Common questions about ASICS Superblast 2
What do runners say about ASICS Superblast 2?
Runners mostly describe the Superblast 2 as a firm, stable and very durable trainer for long runs and daily miles, with many reporting very long wear. A break-in of many miles is common, and some never warm to the stiff, heavy feel at slow paces.
Is ASICS Superblast 2 worth it?
Of the 188 reviews with a clear verdict, 57% are positive, 18% mixed and 26% negative. The praise mentioned most is durable. The most common complaint is heavy.
What are the most common complaints about ASICS Superblast 2?
The complaints reviewers mention most: heavy (5 reviews), narrow fit (4 reviews) and heel slip (1 review). For example: After about 50 km they found the Superblast 2 clunky and too firm and didn't enjoy it, preferring the Supernova Prima for long runs.
Where do these ASICS Superblast 2 reviews come from?
We collected and summarized 187 experiences shared on Reddit, YouTube and blogs, with links to the original sources. One review was submitted directly to RunningRecs. Reviews submitted here are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, submitted here or collected, is read as positive, mixed or negative.
More max cushion
The softest, highest-stack shoes for long and recovery runs, ranked by real runners.
