Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!

Brooks Cascadia 19

Brooks Cascadia 19 Reviews

TrailRanked #3 in Trail shoes

Plush, grippy trail shoe liked by wide-footed and ultra runners; a few fans dislike the softer feel.

91Signal score
74% positive
35reviews
How the signal works
The signal score

A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.

So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.

Updated 13 Nov

Check price on Amazon Read 35 reviews

What people mention

Real runner experiences (35)

Add your review

Showing 6 reviews mentioning great for long runs Show all

Reddit · r/trailrunning · May 19, 2026 · summarized

Positive

Ran a 50-mile ultra in the Cascadia 19 and prefers its extra cushion to the older brick-like models.

Reddit · r/trailrunning · Mar 25, 2026 · summarized

Positive

Has run two 50-milers in the Cascadia 19 and is a fan.

Reddit · r/trailrunning · Dec 22, 2025 · summarized

Positive

Their favourite trail shoe for wide feet: completed a first 100k on technical terrain in the Cascadia 19, bombing descents in comfort with great foot protection.

YouTube · Conversational Pace · Sep 11, 2025 · summarized

Positive

Two testers with about 87 and 98 miles, covering long mountain runs in heavy rain and a 41-mile race section. They liked the soft, bouncy foam that felt lighter than its 11 oz, the secure lockdown despite the very padded tongue, the roomy forefoot and the flexible forefoot. The flaw is thin rock protection: the 87-mile tester punctured the exposed forefoot foam and felt rock hits, expects 300 to 400 miles of running, and prefers it for training over racing.

YouTube · The Shoe In With Cody · Jun 17, 2025 · summarized

Positive

About 31 miles of mixed road, gravel, mud and rocky trail with creek crossings, starting with a 12-plus mile first run. They found the foam soft and comfortable, the fit true to size with no blisters or heel slip, and the midfoot snug only until it broke in. Downsides are poor drainage after creek crossings, taking over a mile to feel dry, and a heavily padded tongue that holds water. They'd use it for daily and long runs, even a 50k, on rough terrain.

Blog · Runner’s World – Cat Bowen · summarized

Positive

'A boss of an ultra training shoe' for long, varied efforts where consistency matters, and surprisingly capable on scary technical pitches. Good for the bulk of high-mileage trail training.

Common questions about Brooks Cascadia 19

What do runners say about Brooks Cascadia 19?

Most runners love the Brooks Cascadia 19 as a comfortable, well-cushioned, grippy trail shoe, with many wide-footed runners and ultra runners happy in it. It is softer and plusher than earlier versions, which a few longtime fans dislike. A few mention slow drying, wet-rock grip or a tight fit.

Is Brooks Cascadia 19 worth it?

Of the 35 reviews with a clear verdict, 74% are positive, 9% mixed and 17% negative. The praise mentioned most is comfortable fit. The most common complaint is narrow fit.

What are the most common complaints about Brooks Cascadia 19?

The complaints reviewers mention most: narrow fit (2 reviews). For example: Has worn size 12 in many Cascadias, but the 19 feels tight.

Where do these Brooks Cascadia 19 reviews come from?

We collected and summarized 35 experiences shared on Reddit, blogs and YouTube, with links to the original sources. Reviews submitted here are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, submitted here or collected, is read as positive, mixed or negative.

More trail

Trail and off-road shoes, ranked by real runners.

View all trail

Discover more trail

See all trail