HOKA Zinal 2 Reviews

Wise improvements over the debut model: even lighter and built for speed, a reputable option for shorter trail days on flat, fast surfaces, and it held up reasonably well after 50 miles. It's niche, not for muddy, snowy or technical terrain or distances over a half marathon, and the narrow forefoot won't suit everyone.

After 100+ miles it still has a place for a specific runner: light, fast and fun, and a cheaper unplated alternative to $250 racers. The glove-like fit suits long, standard-width feet with a narrow heel and may be too snug for wide feet. Not an ideal daily trainer; plated shoes do better at 50K+.

A traditional racing flat for the trails: fun, fast, nimble and aggressive, with good forefoot and midfoot lockdown, good traction and a grounded base. A very good option for sub-ultra trail racing. The heel isn't secure enough on sharp turns and switchbacks, and it struggles in mulchy or soft mud.

One tester enjoyed it as a rotation shoe for short, speedy trail runs, almost the anti-HOKA: light, interesting and fun on non-technical trails. But $160 is a bit much for such a specific shoe, and the foot shape may exclude many runners. He suggests the cheaper Altra Superior or Nike Terra Kiger.