Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Mar 9, 2026 · summarized
PositiveOver 400 km, this 3:23 marathoner with wide feet and bunions found the original Cloudmonster Hyper true to size and excellent for long runs with marathon-pace segments.
Quick note: Some links are affiliate links. We earn a tiny commission if you buy (at no cost to you). Keeps the lights on!

Daily trainerRanked #5 in Daily trainers
Roomy upper and springy ride that shines at speed; a few got blisters or heel pain.
A score out of 100 for how well reviewed a product is next to others of its kind. It rises with positive reviews and with how many there are; negative and mixed reviews take points off. The best in each category scores in the 90s.
So a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product lots of people like. No sponsored placements.
Showing 10 reviews mentioning comfortable fit Show all
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Mar 9, 2026 · summarized
PositiveOver 400 km, this 3:23 marathoner with wide feet and bunions found the original Cloudmonster Hyper true to size and excellent for long runs with marathon-pace segments.
YouTube · jogoncrago · Apr 14, 2025 · summarized
PositiveTwo pairs, 860 km and then 210 km, used almost entirely for long runs and easy runs over an hour. They love the secure, roomy upper (it fits about a half size long) and the bouncy forefoot with a structured, stable feel that keeps the legs fresh over 2.5 to 3 hours. It stays firm and a bit clunky for the first half hour or more, the outsole rubber pods wear so heavy heel strikers should be wary, and they call the price far too high. A dedicated long-run shoe more than a daily one.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Feb 25, 2025 · summarized
PositiveAfter a short first run, this runner who struggles with fit really likes the Cloudmonster Hyper's roomy upper.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray · summarized
Negative'Accidentally ordered decaf' (performance C). The upper and fit are near the top of the category, but one tester can't get past the boxy feel, and you can get the same ride or better elsewhere. The rigid, blocky midsole doesn't feel 'super'. Fine if you love On and have the budget.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Ali Ball · summarized
NegativeComfortable, forgiving and stable for easy and longer miles, but not speedy, and v2 does the same for £40 less. She'd pick the Hoka Skyward X any day. It needs a stiffer forefoot and a peppier ride.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · summarized
Negative'Not worth the hype': it's easy to find shoes that offer more for less, like the Superblast. The Endorphin Speed 4, Hoka Mach 6 and Rebel v4 are more enjoyable and much cheaper.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jessica Downey · summarized
PositiveShe genuinely enjoyed it for slow, steady miles and loves the look. But it doesn't feel dramatically different from other big-cushion trainers and doesn't live up to the 'Hyper' name for speed or lightness. Better value exists if price matters.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · Jun 21, 2024 · summarized
MixedRotating it with the Vomero 17, this runner loves the Cloudmonster Hyper's wide toe box, but it gives them a blister below the ball of the foot.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · May 2, 2024 · summarized
PositiveThis runner with wide, high-arched feet finds the Cloudmonster Hyper's upper more comfortable than any shoe they've tried in a long time, though it's expensive.
YouTube · The Run Testers · Apr 12, 2024 · summarized
MixedThree testers each logged roughly 50 to 60 km, mostly easy runs, with an interval session and runs up to about 20 km or 90 minutes. They found it comfortable and protective, with a roomy, secure fit and a ride that softens later in a run. They also found it firm and stiff early on, a dull, bottom-heavy ride that is not versatile, and grip that felt slippery on wet roads. Overall they would not recommend it at its price, seeing it as a cushioned shoe for easy miles.
Most runners find the On Cloudmonster Hyper very comfortable, with a roomy upper and a springy ride that shines at faster paces and works as a daily trainer. A few got blisters or heel pain, and a couple found it heavy or clunky. Several say it is best bought on sale.
Of the 27 reviews with a clear verdict, 67% are positive, 15% mixed and 19% negative. The praise mentioned most is comfortable fit. The most common complaint is heavy.
The complaints reviewers mention most: heavy (1 review). For example: 'Accidentally ordered decaf' (performance C). The upper and fit are near the top of the category, but one tester can't get past the boxy feel, and you can get the same ride or better elsewhere. The rigid, blocky midsole doesn't feel 'super'. Fine if you love On and have the budget.
We collected and summarized 27 experiences shared on Reddit, blogs and YouTube, with links to the original sources. Reviews submitted here are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, submitted here or collected, is read as positive, mixed or negative.
Everyday shoes for easy and steady miles, ranked by real runners.