Home/Reviews
Fresh experiences from real runners, collected from Reddit, YouTube and blogs and linked to their sources.
Blog · WeeViews – Hollie S · 2 days ago
Proof Salomon can make a legit road racer: responsive, bouncy foam, an efficient plate, a smooth ride, a light, breathable upper, and traction she'd trust in the wet. Minimal wear at 50 miles, and she expects ~200. One of her favourite carbon shoes this year. Not for short intervals.
Blog · Runpanel – Or Dalah · 2 days ago
A rare combination of softness, bounce and stability: soft landings, very high responsiveness, and heel and upper stabilisers that, unlike other soft shoes, didn't irritate his ankle tendons. No visible outsole wear after ~200 km, and Contagrip improves grip on asphalt. The extra ankle support takes getting used to.
Blog · RunMag – David · 2 days ago
9/10. A very pleasant fit that adapts even to wide feet, with slipper-like comfort and lightness. Soft Energy Foam+ and a carbon plate combine for dynamic, efficient fast running, and the grip bites on the forefoot. He wouldn't use it for easy endurance runs. Ideal for prepared racers, 5K to marathon.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
A winner: a true race-day fit and a bouncy-yet-stable Pebax midsole, though a touch firmer than rivals. Salomon has arrived on the marathon scene, with forefoot stability that keeps runners comfortable late on, but he wouldn't spend Alphafly money on a first-generation racer.
Blog · Running Lab – Julien Guyod · 2 days ago
A 2:38 marathoner calls it a formidable weapon from 5K to the marathon: excellent shock absorption at any distance, best when you accelerate, and a tough Atomknit upper. Less explosive for sharp track work. The foam shows visible wear fast and an Air unit burst on his v3, so save it for race day.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Nathan Brown · 2 days ago
His current racing shoe of choice from 5 miles to the marathon: bouncy, fun and versatile, with a secure, roomy-for-a-racer fit, and comparatively stable, so it works at 5:30/mile or 9+ min/mile. It's comparatively heavy (still light) and squeaky; 5K specialists have lighter, more aggressive options.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
It remains one of the best race-day shoes, especially for the marathon: a comfortable, accommodating upper, light, bouncy foam and Air pods that carry tired legs late on, now cheaper. Lighter, faster options exist, and it squeaked for the first 5–6 miles. Another tester: 'you can buy confidence.'
Blog · Run & Smile – Roman Brcar · 2 days ago
Not a do-it-all shoe. Bought with his own money, reviewed in agreement with NB. Over 120 km it felt light, snappy and propulsive; it kept him in control through a half marathon and showed no outsole wear. Comfortable with no blisters, sticky on wet roads and stable in corners. Best for 5K to half and workouts, not easy runs. Size up half.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 2 days ago
One tester (8.9/10): delightfully fast turnover, a plate at a sweet spot of stiffness, and a fine choice from 5K to half, though the heel design is problematic. An ideal racer up to the half and an all-round trainer, smooth even at 10:30/mile thanks to a snappy flex, and the outsole looks great after 50 miles.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 2 days ago
A firmer, lower-stack super shoe true to its 5K–10K purpose (one tester says up to a half), and good value at $200. But one tester found it a bit soft for fast efforts, with a short fit, heel rubbing and early outsole tearing. Another tester gave the fit an F: heel blisters and bleeding kept it out of her 7-mile race.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
One of her favourite updates, a more traditional race-day feel for distance runners, kept in her rotation through summer speed work. Probably the most fun shoe he's run in: not the softest, bounciest or most propulsive, but it blends all three into a fantastic racer across paces from tempo to top speed.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A decent racer, but he hoped to improve on the Elite 4 PB, which feels faster to him. It's too firm and lacks bounce, so he wouldn't race a marathon in it. Positives: a stiff, snappy plate, outstanding outsole durability, more stability than most racers. The heel counter is loose, and it's not worth $275.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
Brooks finally has a legit super racer: bouncy foam, a responsive heel and good durability after 30 hard miles, best for longer efforts. But heel slippage, excessive toe spring and poor midfoot stability limit him to moderate distances. It lacks speed versatility, the upper needs work, and it's not a $275 shoe.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 2 days ago
Graded D for value at $275. One tester found it efficient (splits faster than it felt) but too squishy, with a loose heel on corners. It rides like an old racing flat without super-shoe spark. A third tester was surprised: light, fast and durable with excellent grip; he'd use it up to a half, not a marathon.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The fastest, lightest, most exciting racer on the market: his heart rate ran lower at speed and he recovered faster between reps. But it's wobbly and soft, may lack support late in a marathon, and might only be at its best for about 100 miles. At $500 he says most people who'd have to buy it probably shouldn't.
Blog · The Running Channel – Aubrey (via Mark Dredge) · 2 days ago
One tester, a sub-4 marathoner who bought his own pair, ran a two-minute half PB in it: serious pop, best-in-class foam and surprising comfort. Downsides: £450/$500, built for one marathon plus some training, a barely-there upper that needs careful lacing, short laces, and a squishy ride for strong runners only.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
For some runners the super-soft, springy ride will be irresistible: very fun and undoubtedly quick, matched only by the even less stable Metaspeed Ray. For him it's a little too soft, and heavier than rivals: the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo and Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 are a couple of ounces lighter and remain his picks.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers & Matt Klein · 2 days ago
Incredibly soft and responsive, with a secure, comfortable upper, a great wide squared-off toe box, and more stability and speed versatility than v2. It's soft and unstable when slow, and one tester preferred it at 5K–10K pace. It's heavy for a modern super racer and unstable cornering at speed.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
A solid update with extra foam adding welcome stability. It's light, comfortable and bouncy, and one tester will keep it for workouts and long runs, but it's a bit too squishy and lacks the aggressive snap she wants on the start line. One of the comfiest racers, not the lightest or fastest.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 2 days ago
One tester may have found her new race-day shoe: the incredibly bouncy, fun ride of the EE2 in a much better-fitting upper with a slotted carbon plate and tweaked geometry. Testers flag that it's heavy for a top super shoe and priced at the top end, and another tester feels the added drive costs some of the bouncy fun.
Blog · Jolie Foulée – Nicolas Brun · 2 days ago
'A hell of a shoe': more comfortable and less narrow than an Adios Pro 4, with immediate dynamism that lowered his heart rate at a given pace, and the LightSpray upper hadn't moved an inch after 100+ km. At 158 g it's built for marathons and long races on the road. Like most super shoes, it dislikes turns.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini & Roberto · 2 days ago
Very light (158–168 g) and comfortable once on, built for steady marathon pacing, not explosive pushes, with less reactivity than the first Strike or Echo 3. After testing, the right shoe showed partial sole separation and a midsole cut. At €310 it's hard to justify over the laced version.
Blog · Akirun – Akira · 2 days ago
Pace decides it: at 4:30/km it shone, stable and rolling over 35 km, ideal for sub-3.5 to sub-4. Jogging at 6:00/km it feels board-like and slaps, and at 4:00/km and interval pace it gives clearly less help than a Metaspeed, so it's not a sub-3 racer. The outsole tread is still good at 300 km.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Sam Winebaum · 2 days ago
Delivers exactly what S4 stands for: speed, stability, safety and sub-4. Stability is the highlight, almost to a fault: you won't wobble, sit back on your heels or struggle to transition whatever your race pace, at a reasonable 8.1 oz and $200. The dense lower Flytefoam gives a dull, firm heel with little bounce.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
If you've run in a Metaspeed or any super shoe, you won't be happy: it's firmer and less engaging. ASICS made it too firm for stability and kept old Flytefoam underneath. It's slightly lighter than the S4 with excellent traction, but it doesn't feel like a super shoe, and the US price is ~$50 above Japan's.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great racing and fast-training option for Altra loyalists, light at 223 g and grippy even on wet roads. But the EVA foam showed considerable wear after just 55 km. Given the high price, durability concerns and a midsole that's less fast and propulsive than the best, non-devotees will find better carbon shoes.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Renee Krusemark, Jeff Beck & Cheng Chen · 2 days ago
A smooth, healthy ride that's stable across a very wide pace range, similar at 9:00 and 6:00 pace, unlike the Endorphin Pro or Vaporfly. It balances comfort and response.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
He likes it: a lively ride, cushioning that can chew up miles, and a plate noticeable enough to help click off miles. Once on, it's the best-fitting Altra he's tested, though classic fans may miss toe room. The thick, waxy laces are hard to adjust, an odd choice on a $240 shoe, and the tongue makes it fiddly to put on.
Blog · Pace Buddies – Joost Dekker · 2 days ago
His ideal bridge to minimalist running after injury: a very wide toe box, a light 224 g weight, a hugging heel and a responsive near-ground feel. After 600 km the heel is worn and it needs replacing, but the knit held up. It's brilliant in heat but cold below 5°C, and no shoe for heel strikers.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
Altra's lowest-stack shoe, best at moderate-to-uptempo paces and fartleks, and its stiff platform may help those with hallux limitus. For one tester the stiff platform felt like fighting the shoe at faster paces, and the big weight gain over v1 held it back. Durability is typical, and it isn't for technical terrain.
Blog · Runner's World – Amanda Furrer · 2 days ago
Light and speedy, with supportive firm-but-soft-feeling cushioning and a Speedroll rocker that encourages smooth turnover, she explains, rather than sponges or pillows. Her one con: rubbing irritation at the back of the heel.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Stacey Gross · 2 days ago
Still the everyday runner's carbon-plated shoe: super durable on the road, the treadmill and even crushed gravel. It loses points for the new sock-like upper, which isn't very flexible. The heel collar can irritate with low socks, and it runs a little narrow with no wide option yet.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A completely different shoe: a faster distance super racer that's still durable enough for lots of workouts and races, with a stable rear/midfoot, a smooth rockered forefoot, a wider fit and great traction. The forefoot is less stable medially, and the harsh upper with a thin tongue caused lace bite early on.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great racing shoe that stands up well against the best on the market and is Brooks' best racer yet. He wouldn't rush to buy it, though, given the quality of rivals and the imminent successor.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Brooks finally joins the PEBA party with a competitive marathon racer: more energy return, responsiveness that made speeding up effortless, and an incredibly breathable knit upper. Its firm-ish ride resembles the Metaspeed Sky Paris. There's no aggressive forefoot rocker, and the design looks dated.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger & Meaghan Murray · 2 days ago
Not one tester's first pick. Brooks finally has a competitive marathon racer that stacks up against the Vaporfly, Metaspeed and Adios Pro 4. One tester, burned by v2 (22 miles to bloody heels), wouldn't make it her #1 start-line pick but thinks it will be for many. Another tester is wary of how Brooks has rolled out its racers.
Blog · Runhike – Tofu · 2 days ago
Specialised for lightness, middling in performance. With no plate to the toe the final push-off is weak, and stride extension takes effort. It lacks the rocker-roll of the Edge Tokyo too. Only an advantage in races where every gram matters, and he can't find a use for it next to the Sky and Edge.
Blog · Kyo mo Hashirimasuta+ · 2 days ago
A strong buy: marshmallow-soft and astonishingly light, and he ran his 3 km ekiden leg 47 s faster than the previous year, a PB at 53. The outsole wore as if he'd run a full marathon after only 3 km, and the instability gave him sore abs for three days. Keep it for very special races.
Blog · Kami no BU Nisshi – Kami · 2 days ago
Under 120 g and feels like nothing, with soft foam and surprisingly durable thin rubber after a full marathon. But it was wobbly even at 3:35/km, and he cramped after 20 km at Kobe. As he faded, the softness turned into bouncing up rather than forward, so for him it's a half-marathon-and-under shoe.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
Ridiculously good at race pace, sinking into soft foam that gives the energy straight back. A weapon on the right feet, but not for most people: recovery jogs felt wobbly, one tester wouldn't recommend it to mid-pack marathoners, and another tester's pair looked heavily worn at 52 mi.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas · 2 days ago
Incredibly light and bouncy, with plenty of cushioning for long-distance racing and an A- for performance. The FF Leap foam is inherently unstable and the narrow midfoot doesn't help, so it can wobble through the midfoot and on sharp turns.
Blog · FueledByLOLZ – Hollie Sick · 2 days ago
She likes the ride for shorter efforts. She likes it, but it's too firm for her beyond 15 miles. After 50 miles the outsole showed significant wear, so she doubts it will last 100. At $289 it's no better than other carbon racers: you pay for the name.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Disappointing and not in his top two tiers of marathon racers. The ride is too firm, the propulsion modest and the rocker not prominent. Traction, the upper and lockdown are great, but durability is the biggest weakness, with heavy lateral wear, and at $290 it's not worth it.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Ryan, Derek, Joost & Sam · 2 days ago
Smooth and efficient at 10K-to-marathon race pace and nimble like a racing flat. It helps hold turnover and is a huge step up from Echo 1. It needs roughly 8:10/mile or faster, the plate feels rigid near the heel, the price is top level, and one tester saw significant outsole wear by 45 mi.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Robbe Reddinger & Ryan Haines · 2 days ago
Light years ahead of the hard-plated Echo 1 and 2: in mile repeats the shoe seemed to disappear, and it runs faster than its fairly heavy weight. One tester wouldn't pick it for a marathon, since the firm HF foam would thrash his legs, but it's great for 10K and under, maybe a half.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
A premium upper on a firmer super-shoe base that finally fixes the Echo's gaps. One of the best-fitting super shoes she has tested, highly responsive and most comfortable at 5K to threshold pace. Neither liked it as much at marathon pace, and the price stays high.
Blog · taka-run – taka · 2 days ago
A sharply focused shoe for intermediate and advanced forefoot runners: overwhelmingly light with spike-like ground feel and superb forefoot rebound. He planned to use it for regular speed work too, so he wished it were more durable. The thin upper looks fragile, and it's expensive and demanding of fitness.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
Rated A: it feels more like a spike (a Dragonfly) than a shoe, and he could hold 1500 m race pace on the road, so he could replace spikes for some sessions. Very light, great on the track and for hard sessions. It runs slightly small and narrow, it's not for heel strikers, and the price rose about ¥6,000.
Blog · Runner's World UK – Rick Pearson · 2 days ago
Refreshing in a marathon-focused market: bold updates make it a true PB-breaker for 10K and under. Propulsive, true to size and comfortable out of the box. Its limited application makes it an extra super shoe rather than your only one.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Bryan & Ryan · 2 days ago
Five smiles from one tester: bespoke and epic at track-rep paces, where ZoomX and the plate give a smooth toe-off. It's more forgiving than spikes, with a phenomenally grippy outsole. Very specific and unversatile, harsher than most road shoes, for forefoot strikers only, and durability is likely limited.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger & Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
It finally separates this shoe from the do-it-all Vaporfly, and one tester thinks it now stands apart from every other 5K racer. A cutthroat, short-distance specialist rather than a versatile shoe.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
Performance graded A+: the best shoe she has tested for road mile races. Super light and highly responsive, with ground feel that lets you load the forefoot. Best for mile to 5K, or 10K with strong feet. Heel strikers may feel a negative drop, the upper is narrow and snug, and she sized up half a size.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
A near-elite model he rates A+: speed close to the SC Elite v6 with equal rebound, strong propulsion and plenty of cushioning without hard foam. Good for long runs, threshold work, intervals and marathons from sub-3 to sub-4. The one downside is that it feels unstable for jogging.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Peter, Maya, Sam, Sally, Stephen & Adam · 2 days ago
More nimble, faster and more fun than the SC Trainer it replaces: it feels terrific at any pace and hums at marathon pace, and one tester questions his race-shoe choice. Grip was fine on slippery stone, but it's tippy on loose gravel. Testers agree the upper won't suit broad or high-volume feet.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein & team · 2 days ago
A light, responsive Infinion trainer with real pace versatility: a bouncy heel and early forefoot transition that feel solid on long runs, easy days, tempos and intervals. The tapered toe box, narrow fit and inconsistent sizing across testers need fixing. The forefoot is firmer.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
He felt huge propulsion and a fast rebound: a tough 6 x 2 km session went almost perfectly and faster than planned. The downside was heavy calf fatigue, as if the quick return didn't sync with his stride. At ¥35,000 he thinks cheaper alternatives exist.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Peter & Renee · 2 days ago
A great-looking, fun race shoe that pushes you forward and shines in fast tempo work and races. It is stable for a 40 mm racer. Not as pleasant at slower paces, it needs a strong forefoot toe-off, and it could be lighter and more versatile.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Deep, fun cushioning that he looked forward to running in, but it's heavier, softer and slower to transition than v1. The squishy heel and lack of a forefoot rocker make workouts feel inefficient. At $260 he can't recommend it over cheaper, faster racers.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger & Meaghan Murray · 2 days ago
One of the best non-PEBA racers he has tried, with real bounce and pop and a forefoot that makes interval paces feel sustainable. Another tester loved the soft step-in feel. The weight makes one tester hesitant to race a marathon in it.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein · 2 days ago
A bouncy, maximal-stack racer whose long forefoot plate rewards runners with the calf strength to pivot off it. The extra ounce leaves it in an awkward spot between short workouts and the marathon, and the Achilles tab chafed. He wouldn't buy it at the price.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
About 20 g lighter, handles all speed work, simple to use, and about ¥6,000 cheaper. The cushioning is slightly reduced.
Blog · Hokkaido Deli-Cam Run · 2 days ago
Shockingly light (153 g at 25.5 cm) with a better fit and smooth leg turnover: a real weapon for the back half of a marathon. If you want the VF3's explosive pop, you may find it slightly lacking.
Blog · Tomo-Ran – Ranmaru · 2 days ago
Ultra light, with direct ground feel and strong midfoot rebound that is hard to stop once rolling. A record weapon up to the half. For him the full marathon was very taxing, it is narrow for wide feet, and it is overkill and pricey for jogging.
Blog · Masa's Running Diary · 2 days ago
A sub-3.5 runner who ignored the 'half only' warnings: at 30 km he felt surprisingly fresh. He faded only on small climbs after 35 km, it was his easiest marathon finish yet, and his hip held up. 3:12 on a course that doesn't suit him.
Blog · iRun – Ben Kaplan · 2 days ago
A race-and-shoe story: landing on the balls of his feet, he felt the propulsion 'like pulling a Ferrari onto the Autobahn'. He finally found a runner's high at the Ottawa Marathon, and runners at the finish asked about his shoes.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate, Thomas Hengge · 2 days ago
A snappy, versatile road racer: exceptionally fast for intervals and marathon-pace runs. The extra arch room helps high arches. On 15–16-mile workouts it firmed up and one tester wished for the Alphafly. Heel slip is listed as a con.
Blog · Sub3 – Patrick Hayes · 2 days ago
After PB-ing from 5K to half in it, he raced Seville in it: five reasons to consider it for a marathon despite the usual caution. It works best for engaged forefoot or light midfoot strikers. Grip isn't as confidence-inspiring as the VF3, so a wet race would give him pause.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Cortney Berling · 2 days ago
Rated 88%. A significant update: the weight drop keeps it a fast shoe for shorter distances, best at half marathon and below, though you could get away with a marathon. It may feel more unstable and still lacks durability.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Scores 7.6: a compact, almost minimalist racer despite the 40 mm stack, and a super shoe for everyone (midsole 8). The weight saving compromises stability for runners who aren't perfectly neutral or who overpronate even slightly. Solidly built: wear suggests 350+ km of racing. €280 is steep (value 6).
Blog · K's Running Life · 2 days ago
A citizen runner who chose it as his race shoe for the season. In his marathon he felt strong propulsion, running about 20 s/km faster than his usual feel. It is light at 207 g (27 cm) versus 243 g for v4.
Blog · Soushoku Junrei · 2 days ago
In his comparison for sub-3.5 to sub-3.15 runners, the Elite v4/v5 led to real race results (3:16 in v5). The Endorphin Elite 2 caused sesamoid pain and a fade. He values staying pain-free to the late stages over spec sheets.
Blog · T&Y's Papa · 2 days ago
Bought 10 days before Beppu-Oita. It held sub-3:15 pace to 35 km despite cramps and he set a PB with a minimal fade. The sole bounces moderately and the plate gives back what you put in: no standout trait, which is its strength. Lace tension made a big difference.
Blog · Run Hike – Toufu · 2 days ago
'An ally of the citizen runner': it handles any foot strike and a wide range of race paces, it is easy to use even at sub-3, and the grip doesn't slip. It is cheap on sale. It went from a rolling to a push-off shoe, it is very narrow, and he felt no Energy Arc benefit.
Blog · T3 – Matt Kollat · 2 days ago
Proves NB can make a true super shoe: fast, bouncy and surprisingly stable, with a wide toe box that finally fits wide feet. The outsole grip is improved and it is built to last (v4's outsole peeled after three runs). It is steep in price, the laces are long and ground feel is limited.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Scores 7.3. It balances cushioning and reactivity, so it doesn't tire you out while returning energy with every step (energy return 8). The plate gives a decisive forward push. Estimated life is 350–400 km, and FF Leap seems to wear faster than FF Turbo.
Blog · Run Hike – Toufu · 2 days ago
A shoe that cuts time, for runners who lengthen their stride. The new midsole makes it usable by more runners, and once up to speed it pulls you forward. It demands leg strength to keep compressing the foam over 42 km, and the arch is pinched hard.
Blog · ichiuma · 2 days ago
FF LEAP makes it lighter (~160 g at 27.0 cm) with more rebound and cushioning. After running both, he prefers it for its rebound and propulsion. Sizing at foot length +1.0 cm worked.
Blog · Sub-3 Runner's Wardrobe · 2 days ago
A cadence runner (191 spm) amazed by how much the cushioning and rebound have evolved: at 4:05–4:15/km the shoe widens your stride for you. When he faded to 5:00/km late on, it suddenly felt like a hard board. Not a magic shoe for everyone, but he will race Kobe in it.
Blog · Hokkaido Deli-Cam Run · 2 days ago
Light and propulsive, with rebound that leaves your legs fresh late in the race. The fit and breathability are excellent. It is slightly unstable on corners and rough roads, and durability is low: the toe and heel were gouged by ~150 km. He recommends saving it for goal races.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
One tester preferred the Edge in earlier generations but now prefers the Sky. The tongue is a thin flap that folds over easily, and choosing between Sky and Edge remains confusing.
Blog · Fordy Runs · 2 days ago
Outstanding, possibly PB-worthy, for stride-style mid/forefoot strikers who want something fast and fun. The rearfoot is still too soft and unstable for heel strikers or heavy pronators over longer distances. Best for 5K to half marathon.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 2 days ago
Very fast: the aggressive geometry and explosive foam keep your legs rolling deep into hard efforts. The fit is the real problem. It is snug and runs a little short, with rigid, rough upper materials that can rub. They suggest trying a half size up.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
Surprisingly light at 204 g (26.5 cm) and the cheapest thick-soled racer at ¥23,000. He says the instability is actually a plus. The fit is only okay, with some heel slip unless tightly laced.
Blog · tomo.run · 2 days ago
Bought out of curiosity with low expectations, and pleasantly surprised: the rebound is excellent. He'll use it for 5–10 km races, but finds the cushioning a bit short for a half or full marathon.
Blog · Unattached Runner – Seiya Ishikawa · 2 days ago
A unique ride with high cushioning at a low price for a top model. It is still unstable (better than v1), and the rebound is only moderate.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
The most radical racing shoe he has tested. Run with purpose and the Smooth Speed Assist rocker pushes you onto the midfoot. Grip is reliable even in the wet. Recommended, but not particularly stable.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT), Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
Rated B+/A-. A centred, forward-geared ride that feels slightly more stable than v1, though it isn't a stability shoe. It fits short, and there was some heel slippage.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Amanda Brooks, tester Lindsey · 2 days ago
A lightweight, firmer speed shoe with a roomy toe box and a well-balanced padded tongue. It is likely not for runs over 9–10 miles if you're used to a lot of cushion.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 2 days ago
Rated B+/A-. An excellent lightweight performance trainer for warm-ups through fast paces, with good traction and a natural, ground-feel ride. One tester rates the fit A+. Another tester found the upper snug and low-volume, and it holds water in heat and humidity.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Kaleb Kabakjian · 2 days ago
Hype justified: a lightweight daily trainer that also works as a fast-day or short race-day shoe. It is more versatile than the Hyperion Max 2, which has only one speed.
Blog · YukiYamada – Yuki Yamada · 2 days ago
Explosive but rough-edged: very propulsive at ~4:00/km, though wobbly at slower paces. It is heavier than expected and the heel is sharp.
Blog · Hiroichi blog · 2 days ago
A 50s runner: light and rolling, with little leg fatigue in training. In the hilly, windy marathon it was great to halfway. After 30 km the soft midsole lost stability and power, and he faded badly at 38 km. He felt some heel slip. He advises doing long runs in it before racing.
Blog · Tom's Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
It can feel amazing at speed but is demanding and unstable. He wouldn't recommend it to most runners over more forgiving super shoes.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
He didn't enjoy it. It felt unstable, and the sharp heel tab was hard on his Achilles. The grip is good, but he recommends other racers first.
Blog · Journal du Trail – Vincent Gaudin · 2 days ago
4.5/5. Nothing to be ashamed of against the competition: a race shoe as effective as any, and more stable than many. Strengths: weight, dynamism and comfort. Price is a bit high.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger and team · 2 days ago
A real contender: the team was surprised to agree that it was their current top race-day pick among shoes readily available (the original Alphafly is still their favorite). Underfoot feel and energy return put it at the top.
Blog · Coach – Nick Harris-Fry · 2 days ago
A great carbon shoe and the best racer Hoka has made. Any concerns are minor, but minor differences separate the top carbon shoes, so he'd reach for a few bouncier rivals (e.g. the Alphafly) first on race day.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Now worthy of its name: much faster, softer and more speed-assisting than v1, and Hoka finally has a proper super shoe. He would race a full marathon in it. Relatively stable and fairly durable. The forked plate gives less propulsion, and it's heavier and far pricier than v1.
Blog · RunningGearLab – Justin Evenden · 2 days ago
Fast and enjoyable race shoe. True to size, with a fitted toe box and a secure, race-focused midfoot. The heel collar was his main problem: it rubbed near his Achilles and became painful on the first long, fast workout. Do a short test run before a long one.
Blog · Hokkaido Delicam Run · 2 days ago
Ran 1:31:26 against a 1:35 goal: the soft cushion didn't fatigue his legs, and he picked up pace in the last 5 km. Good grip on damp, rainy roads, and the outsole was almost undamaged afterward. A great first carbon racer that rivals the Vaporfly and Adios Pro. Expensive at ¥35,200.
Blog · One Day's Light – Kattsun · 2 days ago
Felt good at Kanazawa: plush cushion and a rebound that lengthened his stride, like the original Vaporfly. He'll race Kobe in it. Some instability on sharp turns and U-turns, and it slipped on wet early-race roads, so beware wet white lines and manholes.
Blog · The Running Club – Andrea Soffientini · 2 days ago
Score 7.4. Like its predecessor, a convincing super shoe with solid performance at all distances. Mainly for light, neutral runners who can hold at least sub-3-hour marathon pace.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
B+. A super distance racer for 10K to marathon with an incredibly bouncy, fast-rolling, highly rockered ride and a secure fit. The narrow heel/midfoot base and soft dual PEBA make it wobbly, so it's best for runners with stable ankles. Tapered toe box.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
A sneaky favorite fast-day shoe for one tester's long Boston workouts. This time the tweaks paid off: a legitimate race-day weapon that no longer lives in the Rocket X's shadow.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Fun, with an extreme forefoot rocker, but not the update he hoped for. Softer, faster and more aggressive, yet still too heavy for racing, so the speed assistance is cancelled out. Not comfortable for long runs due to the foam and plate setup: not enough bounce and harsh transitions. Good traction.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Chad Zimmermann · 2 days ago
More enjoyable overall than its predecessor. One tester loved the look and the far more accommodating toebox and fit: v2 crammed his toes. The upper is comfortable, and the Continental Lighttraxion outsole and energy-rod/plate setup suit long workouts.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 2 days ago
B+. An awesome long-run super trainer with a wider, comfortable fit and bouncy heel, and it gave decent guidance on long runs. Lace bite, a rough inner upper (socks required, ideally thick), and a less stable midfoot than v2, whose lateral bias tires you late.
Blog · Marathon Handbook – Alex Cyr · 2 days ago
Definitely not a world-beating super shoe, and not an easy-run shoe. The rocker propels you but forces you onto your toes, and it fits small (his toes were wrecked after a workout; size up). Too much shoe for him to race in, but a solid, aggressive workout tool.
Blog · RunToTheFinish – Jeff Ruane · 2 days ago
Comes alive when you pick up the pace: the rocker propels you forward and toe-offs feel effortless. The jacquard mesh dried within minutes after a snow-melt splash. The narrower heel and midfoot cost some of v1's stability, so it's not for wide feet, heavier runners or those with stability needs.
Blog · Runner's World – Jeff Dengate · 2 days ago
Faster, lighter and more propulsive than v1, with an exceptionally thin, breathable upper. A big rockered racer for workouts and marathons. Some testers found the soft foam too much late in long efforts.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas (DPT) · 2 days ago
A-/A overall, with an A personal grade: one of his favorite racing shoes so far this year, and one he hinted he might be writing about again later in the year.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 2 days ago
9.5/10, ASICS' best road racer yet and his go-to race-day shoe: featherweight, highly breathable, with grippy ASICSGRIP. The synthetic-suede tongue is uncomfortable and doesn't relieve lace pressure, and he feels it's less suited to forefoot strikers.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
A brilliant update and now a top-tier racer he'd use for a marathon. Softer and more energetic, with a wider midfoot and a better upper. Far more stable than the Fast-R 3, Adios Pro 4 and Sky Tokyo. The ungusseted tongue folds, the price jumped, and it's still narrow for flat arches.
Blog · RuncerLAB – AZ · 2 days ago
Trampoline-like rebound and propulsion beyond the Adios Pro 4, and LT pace feels easier. Ideal for a half or 10K. For the full marathon he picks the Pro 4, as the rebound may tire sub-3 hopefuls after 30 km. Breathable mesh gets cold in winter.
Blog · Mahiro Running Blog · 2 days ago
Rebound and propulsion still as expected at 480 km. Durability, which he hadn't expected, was a pleasant surprise. His stride reached 1.23 m at the Hokkaido Marathon (target 1.16). Some upper and midsole peeling. Still his main race shoe for Tokyo 2027.
Blog · The Running Club – Paolo Corsini · 2 days ago
Score 7.45. A true super racer and the missing piece in On's range. The thick insole/midsole gives high forefoot protection without losing reactivity. It suits a push-off, forefoot style and needs good running mechanics. The thin outsole rubber will likely wear first.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Nathan Chiang, Andrea Myers · 2 days ago
A-/B+/A-. On's bounciest super shoe. One tester nearly made it his racer of the year except for the heel. Another tester loved it for a 10K but not longer. A third tester gave it an A for the bouncy, propulsive ride she'd missed since the Alphafly 1.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 2 days ago
Much better than the Echo 3: deeper cushion, more energy return and a fun, engaging ride. It suits forefoot strikers; for him, a heel striker, it lacked a forefoot rocker and wasn't efficient enough for a marathon. Runs half a size big, poor wet grip, overpriced at $280.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger · 2 days ago
On's best race shoe yet: light (<8 oz), with Helion HF cushion right under the forefoot and grippy rubber. Sizing ran long by up to a full size, and the stiff heel collar dug into one tester's Achilles, leaving it unrunnable two days later. Wear crew socks. A Vaporfly 3 costs $100 less.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas Neuberger, Meaghan Murray · 3 days ago
A solid race-day shoe for anyone chasing a marathon goal, not just elites, favoring heel strikers. Grips well and looks solid at 40 mi. One tester prefers the Cielo X1 2.0 but would race it without hesitation, and plans to at the JFK 50.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, Andrea Myers (DPTs) · 3 days ago
One tester (A-) has made it his go-to for fast and fast-long efforts, though durability is already in question at 30 mi. Another tester (C-) got posterior tibialis and ankle pain from the medial stability features and won't run in it again.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
'A disappointing update' that he won't use for an important race. It's mellower, softer and plusher than the X 2, more stable and friendly, but better suited to slower runners. He'd take the X 2.
Blog · T3 – Matt Kollat · 3 days ago
'Almost unmissable' for long-distance runners who like to push limits. The new tongue reduces chafing and the extra foam helps you go further. Not race-legal, so hard to recommend to everyone. Long-term durability is untested.
Blog · Running.Reviews – Dan Steptoe-Thompson · 3 days ago
Exceptional cushioning and stability for long runs and marathon-pace efforts, with an effective rocker, and durable so far. Its increased weight is a drawback, and wet grip was worse than expected.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+/A- from both. A fast racer, but one tester prefers the Edge Paris for his mechanics, and another tester says he has to overstride a bit to make it work, though it's nice at controlled efforts. Fit depends heavily on stride type.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
Where a super-shoe search should start and likely end: fast, comfortable and versatile, with a smooth, natural rocker. Traction is weak on wet corners and loose surfaces, there was unusual outsole wear by the toe at ~50 mi, and it isn't very stable.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Maxime Gourmelen, Andy Wright · 3 days ago
'Love at first run': paces come easy and legs take less pounding. One tester has made it his go-to workout shoe for months, praising the light, bouncy ride, comfortable upper and effortless toe-off. Not as aggressive as some rivals. Only cosmetic scuffing at 160 km.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
He rates it the best racing shoe from any brand: incredibly light, efficient and propulsive at every distance from 400 m reps to the marathon. As a heel striker he wore the exposed rear foam after 100 miles, with no effect on the ride.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Ryan Eiler · 3 days ago
9.1/10: improved comfort, a friendlier mesh, snappy turnover and more approachable than v10, with an outsole among the best. Deductions for reduced responsiveness and stability at hard efforts, and a slower transition than its predecessors.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
A- overall: a bouncy, softer, snappy racer for intervals, tempos and mile-to-10K (up to half for faster runners). Fantastic outsole durability, and an amazing $180 price that rivals shoes costing $80 more. The first in the line to impress him in a while. Slight heel slippage.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
An excellent racer he'll recommend regularly, and great value, especially in the UK. Its natural, stable feel will suit many runners better than wilder super shoes, especially late in a marathon.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Ali Ball, Rachel Boswell · 3 days ago
Light and faster than ever, a brilliant choice for extremely fast, lightweight racing. One tester finds it aggressive, needing a lot of power from the front, and will save it for speed sessions and shorter races. Another tester compares it favourably to the Fast-R 3.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 3 days ago
A- overall. One tester: a fast ride from uptempo to 5K pace that he plans to race in. Another tester: great fit, and good value for a super shoe at $250. But the forefoot doesn't suit her midfoot strike, and the narrow rear platform may trouble some. Best for rearfoot strikers.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
One tester's favorite version 'and it's not even close', finally able to go head-to-head with other brands' racers. Another: the best in the line ever and Puma's best race shoe to date. Lighter, wider and softer.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger, Caryn Just · 3 days ago
Lighter and bouncier than v3, great at any pace, and in one tester's top three for race day. The best New Balance marathon racer ever, with a broad, accommodating base and an adaptable upper, though it could lose a couple of ounces.
Blog · The Running Channel – Mark Dredge, Sarah, Meg · 3 days ago
Reliable and comfortable over 22-26 miles, with an extra push forward, and two testers ran marathon PBs in it. Not for runners who want to feel really fast on race day. Try the width and size first.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Michael Sawh · 3 days ago
It served him well on the streets of London: a durable carbon marathon shoe that isn't just for elites, and one he'd recommend. Cheaper rivals offer similar versatility.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Karl Fernandez, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
A great marathon pick with a more natural, freeform feel, and its lighter weight beats the Pro 4 on the road. One tester has full confidence in it. Runners who want an aggressive, on-your-toes plated feel may be slightly disappointed.
Blog · Men’s Health – Brett Williams · 3 days ago
Light and fast, with the new Energyrim carbon element and a great look. Durability concerns are 'not as dire as you heard, but still exist', and the heel pads can cause blisters. Pricey at $275 and best saved for PR attempts.
Blog · Fordy Runs · 3 days ago
'Very good, not great': the ride is excellent, confident, stable and made for the marathon. But chunks were missing from the outsole after 50 miles, which he calls unacceptable. The lockdown is annoying and the upper average, so at this price it feels compromised.
Blog · T3 – Kieran Alger · 3 days ago
A really good, consistent performer with smooth, efficient energy return that still protects when you're struggling, which he leaned on when his race went wrong. Not the punchiest carbon shoe (the Metaspeed Edge and Fast-R3 have more bite), but more accommodating for a wider range of runners.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
B+/A- and A-: an extremely durable, well-priced carbon workout trainer for uptempo work and long runs that saves your race shoes. One tester is disappointed by the weight gain and says it's too stiff for easy runs and not stable enough for long efforts. Another tester wants smoother easy-pace transitions.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Thomas Neuberger, Ryan Haines · 3 days ago
The best version yet, edging from a tempo shoe toward a super trainer. A great budget racer or versatile tempo shoe and a first step into carbon plates. One tester disliked the upper. Less versatile than the Superblast.
Blog · T3 – Matt Kollat · 3 days ago
A tremendously fun, propulsive racer with excellent ground feel, standout cornering and more stability than high-stack marathon shoes. The only grief is the tight upper; wide-footed runners should think twice. Not a do-it-all shoe.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
A specialist tool for efficient runners: high ground feel and a faster, more aggressive ride than v8, with stiffer rods and a more durable outsole. Too firm and harsh beyond ~15 km, and he thinks racers in it are at a disadvantage against super shoes. He keeps it for workouts and hill sprints.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Ben Hobson · 3 days ago
A modernised short-distance racer that does the job very well, with the snap that high-stack shoes lack and a nostalgic, pre-super-shoe feel. Expensive at £170, but worth it for runners focused on running short and fast.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
Rated 7/10: fast and lighter than v2, but too unstable for most runners over a marathon, a groove formed in the outsole by 86 km, and it's $40 dearer. At $300 it's 'not a top-tier marathon racer'. Most 3-hour-plus runners will prefer the Deviate Elite 3.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
Grades A to A+: a forefoot runner's dream racer with a comfortable upper. Forefoot outsole wear already shows at 30 miles.
Blog · WearTesters – Drew Whitcomb · 3 days ago
His new favourite marathon racer: he hardly thought about his feet during his PR, and it turned over quickly when he pushed late. Top tier, though not for everyone.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
A wild design with an incredible ride that stands out in the super-shoe market, and he can't wait to race in it again. Forefoot rubber shows wear after 50 miles, and Puma rates its life at only 200 miles.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
An excellent racer comparable to the best and cheaper than most, with few faults. Still not his first pick: the Metaspeed Sky Paris and Alphafly 3 feel bouncier, and it lacks a very springy feel.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Jeremy Marie, Derek Li · 3 days ago
An excellent cushion-to-weight ratio, a huge weight drop vs v2, springy foam for many paces, a natural ride, and best-in-class grip and durability at a lower price. One tester prefers it to the Adios Pro 3. Another tester notes slight heel instability.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Matt Klein (DPT) · 3 days ago
Overall B+/A-: the snappiest Elite yet. One rear PUMAGRIP outsole piece ripped off within 10 miles of running.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Robbe Reddinger, Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
A bouncy, propulsive aliphatic-TPU midsole with more foam, a more responsive ride and a comfier upper, all lighter. 'Puma hit the brief.'
Blog · T3 – Matt Kollat · 3 days ago
A superb racer that can also train: full of energy in a light package, from parkruns to marathons. Not as versatile as do-it-all trainers.
Blog · Running Shoes Guru – Brandon Law · 3 days ago
'A good racer, but it isn't amazing.' The switch from PEBA to TPU makes it less bouncy and lively than top racers, and the rocker could be more aggressive. Cushioning holds up over long distances, so many will like it for marathons.
Blog · Runner’s World UK – Rachel Boswell · 3 days ago
Double thumbs up: lab data showed she runs marathons slightly more economically in it than in her previous racer. Durable, high energy return, nimble and snappy.
Blog · Road Trail Run – Nils Scharff · 3 days ago
A classic low-cushion racing flat with super-shoe tech, 'close to perfection' for tempo and intervals: an outrageously comfortable upper, an energetic flexible midsole and strong grip. Versatility is limited by the minimal design, and he now needs a half size up.
Blog · Meta Endurance – Alex Filitti · 3 days ago
'Adidas really nailed this update': a sensational upper, an explosive Lightstrike Pro midsole, and zero slippage on wet surfaces. Softer and less stable than v8, which he doesn't mind for short reps. He'd pay the €140 himself.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 3 days ago
A really nice update with an improved upper and midsole that brings back the propulsive feel. One tester compares it to the NB SC Elite v4, one of her favourite racers.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
Fit is truer to size than earlier versions. It excels over longer efforts. One tester finds it very firm: great for 5K/10K, but she wouldn't run a marathon in it because it lacks compliance. Little wear at 30 miles.
Blog · OutdoorGearLab – Nathaniel Bailey · 3 days ago
A stable, controllable first super shoe with great traction, propulsive but understated. It falls short of rivals on outright bounce and versatility. A stiff overlay caused a pinky-toe blister on the first 10-miler.
Blog · Six Minute Mile – Brian Metzler · 3 days ago
His planned marathon race shoe: smooth, semi-soft and bouncy, and great for 10K-to-marathon pace for mid-range (3:15) marathoners. About half an ounce heavier than v3, with a numb, disconnected ground feel. Probably not ideal for sub-3 runners.
Blog · Doctors of Running – David Salas, Matt Klein (DPTs) · 3 days ago
Instability for one tester. Bouncier and more compliant foam with strong performance grades. One tester found it not stable enough for runs past 12 miles, and the stiff toe guard and low toe box rubbed another tester's toes early on.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Possibly the most exciting midsole ever: very soft, quick rebound and fun at any pace. However, the narrow, stiff forefoot upper irritated one tester's metatarsals and another tester's bunion, it runs short in the toe, and another tester's soles hurt after 16 miles.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Meaghan Murray, Thomas Neuberger · 3 days ago
The new IncrediRUN foam is a unique sensation: soft and squishy yet fast. They think it will appeal to everyone from sub-3 marathoners to slower racers.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Kieran Alger · 3 days ago
A fast, fun, propulsive PR-chaser that really delivers when you run with purpose and good form. He'd race a marathon or half in it. He noticed some suction feel at max effort.
Blog · Believe in the Run · 3 days ago
'The Return of the King.' Comfortable, light, fast and bouncy, everything a race-day shoe should be. One tester puts it as 'this shoe and the rest'. Another also likes rivals but rates it uniquely. The previous version had twisted one tester's knee; this one fixes the platform.
Blog · Road Trail Run · 3 days ago
Testers praise the 24g weight drop, terrific upper, smoothest transition yet in the line and strong energy return. Cons: the Zoom Air pods feel mechanical, it may not suit those wanting an aggressive racer, and the laces do all the lockdown. One tester got arch rubbing at ~16 miles.
Blog · Doctors of Running – Andrea Myers, David Salas (DPTs) · 3 days ago
One tester: his favourite in the line and the shoe he grabs to run fastest, though the midfoot ZoomX slides. Another: best at 5K-half pace and sluggish at marathon pace. The short, low toe box bruised her big toenails, and the foam wears early.
Blog · The Running Channel – Mark Dredge / TRC team · 3 days ago
Fast and propulsive. The team pair began losing responsiveness at ~200 miles but is still usable for training. Jogging in it feels ineffective, it's unstable at slow paces, and it needs strong feet and lower legs.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nike's best racer yet: lighter and more aggressive than the AF2, comfortable for marathons, and it helps you hold pace when tired. No undue wear after 80 miles. Very expensive.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Jane McGuire · 3 days ago
Jane McGuire found it fast and trampoline-like, with no rubbing over 26.2 miles and more stability than the Alphafly. It is not the most durable, and feet go numb on cold starts.
Blog · Believe in the Run – Thomas, Meaghan · 3 days ago
Still the top marathon shoe for one tester, with a more breathable, roomier upper. Both slam the gaping heel collar: you have to cinch the laces until it cuts off circulation.
Blog · Powered by Windows · 3 days ago
The runner says it felt amazing when his form matched the plate and best around 200 km. Rebound faded by 500–600 km, and the outer outsole wore early until he adjusted his gait.
Blog · Marathon Handbook – Amanda Martin · 3 days ago
Amanda Martin found it smooth, fast and explosive, and rated it above the Endorphin Pro. The lacing is awkward, the heel feels as if it may slip, and the upper is cold in winter. She estimates 200–250 miles of race life.
Blog · Runner’s World – Jeff Dengate · 3 days ago
Jeff Dengate found it as lively as before and more stable through sharp turns. It is quieter than the VF2 and responded when he surged after 20 miles, though the Flyknit upper does not stretch and the top of his foot was hurting late in the marathon.
Blog · Doctors of Running · 3 days ago
The best-fitting version yet, with excellent wet grip and a responsive ride. The heel and midfoot platform is very narrow and unstable, which made one tester hesitate for longer races. Exposed foam wears quickly.
Blog · Tom’s Guide – Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it light and fast enough for anything from 5K to the marathon. Durability is the main downside, with substantial outsole wear by 100 miles.
Blog · GQ – Tanner Bowden · 3 days ago
Tanner Bowden found it remarkably supportive and stable for a super shoe, cornering better than the Next% 2 and making fast running feel easier. It is not for everyday runs, and lacing takes fine-tuning.
Blog · Find My Footwear – Kieran Alger · 3 days ago
Kieran Alger found it softer, more forgiving and more stable than earlier Vaporflys, which helps late in marathons, though it lost some of the direct raciness he loved and he would still race in a VF2. The upper is loose and lets water in, and the cutouts catch stones.
Blog · Men’s Health — Brett Williams · 3 days ago
Brett Williams found it flat on a slow 10-miler, but on race day it delivered smooth turnover and helped him negative-split the last miles of his strongest marathon. He had no blisters or hotspots over 26.2 miles and found it stable through water stations and corners; it works best around 8:00 per mile or faster.
Blog · Road Trail Run — Michael Ellenberger, Ryan Eiler, Sam Winebaum · 3 days ago
A softer, bouncier, more controllable ride with an excellent, more comfortable upper. Called a top-5 racer despite heel blisters; one tester felt it lost some stability and snappy turnover; another felt the soft heel slowed the transition. Scores 9.4-9.6.
Blog · Gearist — Brandon Wood · 3 days ago
Brandon Wood found it poppy, fun and fast—“made me want to go”—while returning from a car crash. It took about 10 miles to break in, and the rods felt stable rather than intrusive. Grip was great on dry pavement but poor in snow; lacing and heel fit are tricky, and the mesh is scratchy.
Blog · Coach — Nick Harris-Fry · 3 days ago
Nick Harris-Fry found it stiff and unnatural at pace on the first run, but it improved after breaking in. A 15-miler felt smooth and bouncy with no forefoot pain. It is more stable and comfortable than the Pro 2 and a top marathon option, though less speedy for short races and pricier.
Blog · The Running Club — Paolo Corsini · 3 days ago
Paolo Corsini says it remains very fast and responsive after 400+ km. The rods and Lightstrike Pro continued to support him beyond km 30–35 of a marathon, with less fatigue than in the Vaporfly Next% 2. The basic laces and unpadded tongue are fiddly, and the heel-strike rubber wore through.
Blog · Supwell — Meredith Johnston · 3 days ago
Meredith Johnston calls it her favorite shoe right now: fun and light, versatile for long, easy, tempo and doubles. The foam felt softer with daily use but firmed again after resting, and grip was good in rain. The upper is the weak point, with lace bite and a stiff toe piece that improved after break-in.
Blog · Gritty Runners — Paulo Quindere Saraiva · 3 days ago
Paulo Quindere Saraiva says it feels almost unchanged after 400 miles, following a roughly 40-mile break-in: cushioning, energy return and stability held up, with minimal outsole wear and good wet-deck grip. The less-plush upper and slightly shallow toe box are the weak points; it suits easy, long and tempo runs more than true recovery runs.
Blog · Road Trail Run — Stephen Mirarchi · 3 days ago
Stephen Mirarchi reports that at 250 miles the upper is unfazed, the outsole looks better than some racers at 50 miles, and the foam retains its rebound, though it is slightly less bouncy than during the first 150 miles. It is too much shoe for hard uptempo work but great for long runs and downhills; the low toe box caused mild big-toe pressure.
RunningRecs · Gary · 6 days ago
My wife made fun of me when she saw these, especially the weird split in the middle. But honestly they're really fun to run in. They feel a bit awkward and stiff when I'm just walking around, but once I start running they feel completely different, almost like they're pushing me forward. Grip is surprisingly good too, even on wet pavement. Only annoying thing is the tongue, it's really thin and keeps folding when I put them on.
RunningRecs · Kenji · 10 days ago
About 250 km in it, two half marathons plus my track sessions. Lightest shoe I've owned and the bounce at 10k pace is something else. Ran 1:21 for a half, almost two minutes off my PR. At easy pace it feels clumsy so I don't warm up in it. Calves were wrecked for two days after each race. Midfoot is snug and the thin tongue folds over if you're not careful lacing up. The outsole has small dents from gravel but nothing is wearing through yet.
RunningRecs · Fiona R. · 10 days ago
Bought these for a spring half and used them for tempo runs and track sessions before that. Somewhere around 180 km on them now. The foam is properly bouncy, at 4:10/km pace they feel fun and quick and I ran a PB in them. Outsole grip on wet roads has been fine and it's barely worn. But they're heavy for a racer, you notice it next to other carbon shoes. The upper is tight, I went half a size up and they're still snug across the top of my foot. The heel tab rubbed my Achilles until I wore higher socks. And the extended plate at the toe keeps you pushing off the front of the foot, so by the end of a 25 km marathon pace run my calves were done. For a marathon I'd pick something else.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 12 days ago
Product tested the v6 and calls it a great shoe, but finds it less stable, narrower and less comfy underfoot than the v5.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 12 days ago
Prefers the v5 for its more stable, wider platform over the v6 and has bought several pairs of it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 12 days ago
Ran in the SC Rebel for the first time and felt it delivered about 90 percent of the SC Elite v6 performance with a slightly more stable platform, calling it definitely fast.
YouTube · The Run Testers · 12 days ago
Close to 100 km, including two marathons (one raced in Berlin) plus faster training runs. They found a soft, poppy but controlled ride that stayed protective and efficient late in both marathons, a snug true-to-size fit, and good grip and breathability in wet and warmer weather. The heel collar has little padding and caused early blistering and cutting on the first marathon until plasters and thicker socks fixed it, the toe box is narrow, and midsole wear is a known worry, though their pair stayed intact. Suits a wide range of runners more than all-out speed chasers.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
They own the Pro 4 and find it best suited to midfoot and forefoot strikers, since the choppy heel geometry feels less smooth at slower paces.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
They describe the SC Rebel as softer in the heel but firmer with less forefoot foam and a narrower fit, and as a shoe that wants to be run a certain way.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
They own the SC Rebel and like it, but feel the forefoot is a bit thin and want more protection.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
Has run in both the v5 and v6 and finds the v6 slightly less stable with a narrower heel platform, though it adds energy return and drops weight.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
Says they really liked the v5 for long runs and bought a pair of the v6 on the strength of that.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
Absolutely loves their v5 and is considering a second pair as insurance in case the v6 turns out worse.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
Has used the v5 for a while and would recommend it.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 18 days ago
Owns the SC Elite v4 and loves it, which is why they are buying the v6 as well.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 23 days ago
A 57-year-old ran a 3:19 Chicago Marathon in the Endorphin Elite 2, beating their BQ by 11 minutes; some outer knee pain after mile 21 they put down to its instability, plus toenail trauma from swollen feet. Bought another pair for the next marathon.
YouTube · on Ben Parkes - Road Running Reviews · 24 days ago
Has 1,200 km on a first pair and 600 km on a second. As a heavier runner they find the shoes last and last, so the high price is fair per kilometre.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 24 days ago
True to size, the Endorphin Elite 2 rubbed their little toe badly; half a size up still rubbed, and a full size up was the perfect fit.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 25 days ago
A fun shoe with no upper issues, later replaced by a cheaper plateless trainer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Ran two 2-mile races in the Endorphin Pro 4 and it made them feel fast, but a 7-mile interval session in it made their knees hurt.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
The Endorphin Pro 4 has worked really well for them over 5k and 10k, but they aren't sure they can tolerate it for longer.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Bought used and re-soled, they find its Lightstrike foam good for hundreds of miles and improving with use.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Loves it so much they're wary of the update.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 26 days ago
Gives them toe blisters and sizing up isn't an option.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Supremely comfortable, softer and bouncier than the Azura, never any foot ache.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
Their race shoe; it changed their mind about soft shoes without injury worries.
Reddit · r/RunningShoeGeeks · 27 days ago
70 km in with Shoe Goo added and holding up well.
